Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 10218
Eddie Says

Edvard stated: source post

So you think I overlooked it on purpose? That's silly, as that'd beg to have it come back to bite me later. 

Believe it or not Ed, despite your views of me being "like the god of this place", I am capable of overlooking things. I'm not omnipotent. 
 

You fucked up with Primal and TPG, now this...

Wait what? 

You thought I had changed my mind about TPG and used that to build your "Ed has unstable standards" case.

It made sense within it's own presented context, but then you came back with superior evidence later. There's bound to be cases where I'm wrong as I am not infallible, but the only ones you can prove tend to be small hiccups instead of bigger things that you then use to be like:
"If he's wrong about something I said, then he must be wrong about everything he's said about me! Ha HA! I knew I was right! I am awesome and everyone knows it! Everything is right with the world once more!". 

As much as it's fun to mess with you, I do have standards, and unlike yours, as many have bothered to say with examples in the past, they aren't unstable. 
 

Give up man. It's looking petty by now.

Weren't you the one that brought this supposed feud back after returning from your much needed break from the place? 

How would you know why I had that break or how much I needed it? I came back and saw a chainpost of more creepy quotings of me and yappings at me.

I didn't say why beyond saying you needing a break. Having almost the entire website mocking you has to be tiring at some point right? Your tone changes when the place gets to you, exhausts you. 

I didn't know you'd be this sensitive to it after some R&R. You usually come back stronger once you've been chased out briefly. 
 

So you think you start all your fights here, purposely at that? 

I'd say about 95% of them yes. I am the first to provoke. I do it when I don't like something or someone. You and Crow were an exception, I admit it. You attacked me first (Although Crow would keep bitching about how I did attack you first by siding against you with Luna yadda yadda and your tears were too much for her to bear).

Keeping this one. 
 

Also, yeah I dislike DNJack. TPG and others too. It's not a grudge, he didn't do anything bad to me. With Tony it is not a grudge, he didn't do anything bad to me. You need to learn the meaning of the word grudge. Would you say you have a grudge against Xena? How is your shit different?

You think how I am with Xena is the same as how you are with DNJack and TPG? Wow... do I even need to answer this one?

We have different ways of expressing ourselves but yeah it's the same thing. One can be repelled by someone's personality without any provocation. Do you think Sugar has a grudge against Xena? Also, you've even put more energy into Xena than I have into TPG.

I wouldn't compare how you're being with TPG and DNJack to Sugar with Xena or TK. 

Much in common with Sugar, there's key figures that we enjoy watching squirm. It doesn't take a genius to see that ours is indulgent and yours is... something else. 
 

I know if I​ were to say that to you, it'd be to trigger sexist insecurities in a referential form.

So are you saying you'd only say that to get a reaction from me, without really believing it? Are you saying you'd....troll me? Did you just suggest Neurosis might have...trolled me?

No, I said that if I were to say it, it'd be to trigger sexist insecurities in a referential form. It'd have to be there in the first place for it to be worth targeting. Why would I use something that's true about you that won't get a response? 
 

You one paragraph before: " It's like when you were convinced that people who agree with me in regards to you just "must be trolling". "

You dismiss it because "they must be trolling", as opposed to seeing that it's coming from something. 

Tell me then, is it mere trolling for trolling's sake, or is it trolling with something behind it? If it's just for trolling's sake, why is the severity as high as it is, merely because you're an easy target? If it's trolling with something behind it, what do you figure that something is, all of your past fights making people "butthurt" enough to form an anti-ed clique? 

I'm personally more on board with a third answer: "He's had it coming to him." When multiple people all behave at someone in the same way, there's usually something about that someone that's causing it as opposed to something about everyone else who plays into it. 
 

Hoisted by your own petard.

Oh my, looks like your superior logic's got me this time~
 

Turncoat stated: source post

Edvard stated: source post

You don't see me trying to fix your own damaged brain and mess of a life despite both of mine being in a much better state.

/watches him do the above

You're right with this one. I'm done with it. I only continued because you seemed to be receptive to it and willing to have a discussion about it, while I made it clear to you very early that I didn't agree with the premises for your "help", which I didn't/don't really perceive as help at all. Had you displayed the reaction and dismissal I had displayed, I would have stopped. Also, you won't be hearing me forcing upon you the so called "advice and helping attempts" neurotically months from now because "it's fun to get under your skin".

Jeez, you take this shit so personally.

Learn to take a joke when it's a joke. I know you're still learning how snark and sarcasm work, so your sense of irony is lacking beyond displays of the obvious, but holy shit man lighten up. There's a whole world of subtext that you're missing out on by focusing purely on this self-directed narrative of yours. How seriously you take things is what makes you so easy to laugh about. 

Posts: 5426
Eddie Says

Yeah, after you used him in relation to me it was pretty much sealed :D

Tbh I am surprised there are so many fucking gifs of him. Just about any reaction I am after, there's a fucking Dean gif with it describing it accurately haha

Posts: 1564
Eddie Says

Interesting....it's all in the subtext and the mists of time and missing context....;)

Posts: 5426
Eddie Says

Turncoat stated: source post

"If he's wrong about something I said, then he must be wrong about everything he's said about me! Ha HA! I knew I was right! I am awesome and everyone knows it! Everything is right with the world once more!". 

What you need to get from this is that you are prone to seeing my reactions as "confirmation" that you were right in your arguments, and you go and display them under my nose like a cat bringing in some dead critter to prove itself.

I can only prove you wrong when I am lucky to get obvious mistakes Turncoat. After I kept calling for "concrete examples" you are eager to point them out, and you keep missing. That you are proven wrong about some things you believe "prove your points" then it makes it very likely you misinterpret my intentions and are wrong about others...which I can't disprove so easily. Your interpretation that I wanted to cast the spotlight on Tony to shift attacks away from me, for example, was completely false.

 

As much as it's fun to mess with you, I do have standards, and unlike yours, as many have bothered to say with examples in the past, they aren't unstable. 

 

I didn't say why beyond saying you needing a break. Having almost the entire website mocking you has to be tiring at some point right? Your tone changes when the place gets to you, exhausts you. 


I didn't know you'd be this sensitive to it after some R&R. You usually come back stronger once you've been chased out briefly.

I assumed you meant you had chased me out, and you just confirmed it. When I left the whole thing was already over. No one chased me out dumbass.

 

Much in common with Sugar, there's key figures that we enjoy watching squirm. It doesn't take a genius to see that ours is indulgent and yours is... something else. 

Ridiculous. Tony is way more bothered by my attitude towards him than Xena is squirming because of you people.

 

No, I said that if I were to say it, it'd be to trigger sexist insecurities in a referential form. It'd have to be there in the first place for it to be worth targeting. Why would I use something that's true about you that won't get a response? 

You pretty much admitted your goes at me are reduced to trolling at this point Turncoat. Save it.

 

Tell me then, is it mere trolling for trolling's sake, or is it trolling with something behind it? If it's just for trolling's sake, why is the severity as high as it is, merely because you're an easy target? If it's trolling with something behind it, what do you figure that something is, all of your past fights making people "butthurt" enough to form an anti-ed clique? 

Yes, my past clashes with most of you people motivated you to have a say. Now you are pretty much the only one still going on with me, as you can see.  

Posts: 5426
Eddie Says

If more people tell him that, maybe he'll see something really is there ~

Posts: 200
Eddie Says

No matter the occasion or argument, there is always a supernatural gif for it.

I approve.

Posts: 5426
Eddie Says

I worry I'll be tempted to start watching the series haha

Posts: 1564
Eddie Says

Edvard stated: source post

If more people tell him that, maybe he'll see something really is there ~

Mmhmm.....but the denial runs strong in that one...

Posts: 200
Eddie Says

Its an okay show, it has eleven seasons and the humor is decent enough. Give ep1 to ep5 a try and see if you like it 

 

Posts: 10218
Eddie Says

Edvard stated: source post

Your interpretation that I wanted to cast the spotlight on Tony to shift attacks away from me, for example, was completely false.

Was it? 

Concrete evidence plz. 
 

As much as it's fun to mess with you, I do have standards, and unlike yours, as many have bothered to say with examples in the past, they aren't unstable. 

Nice work, you caught one of them. I hoped that the winky face would help, and look, it did! 
 

I didn't say why beyond saying you needing a break. Having almost the entire website mocking you has to be tiring at some point right? Your tone changes when the place gets to you, exhausts you. 


I didn't know you'd be this sensitive to it after some R&R. You usually come back stronger once you've been chased out briefly.

I assumed you meant you had chased me out, and you just confirmed it. When I left the whole thing was already over. No one chased me out dumbass.

I never said it was just me. If it was just me it'd be easier to ignore, but instead you're finding it hard to get away from. 

This is of course assuming you're not calling me a crazy Ring Leader again. 
 

Much in common with Sugar, there's key figures that we enjoy watching squirm. It doesn't take a genius to see that ours is indulgent and yours is... something else. 

Ridiculous. Tony is way more bothered by my attitude towards him than Xena is squirming because of you people.

Is he now? Concrete evidence, or I'll be forced to assume you're the one losing. I see you talk about wanting to punch his lights out much more often than I see him express things of that nature.

At most these days he seems a bit bitter whenever Alia pops into his mind, and not even as often as it used to be. He's growing as a person while you're largely where you once were, albeit a little more meme-worthy and meme-understanding. 
 

No, I said that if I were to say it, it'd be to trigger sexist insecurities in a referential form. It'd have to be there in the first place for it to be worth targeting. Why would I use something that's true about you that won't get a response? 

You pretty much admitted your goes at me are reduced to trolling at this point Turncoat. Save it.

I already admitted to that ages ago when I said that I was tired of trying to help you, but behind said trolling there are still nuggets of truth. 

The jokes had to come from somewhere. I'm not creative enough to just make this shit up. 
 

Tell me then, is it mere trolling for trolling's sake, or is it trolling with something behind it? If it's just for trolling's sake, why is the severity as high as it is, merely because you're an easy target? If it's trolling with something behind it, what do you figure that something is, all of your past fights making people "butthurt" enough to form an anti-ed clique? 

Yes, my past clashes with most of you people motivated you to have a say. Now you are pretty much the only one still going on with me, as you can see.  

Oooh, this is one of the largest keepers yet. 

If you only knew~

This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.