ROFL at this entire thread. hahahahaha!
Wow guys, this topic. That puppet's got to be laughing his ass off.
Ugh, quote limits. I'll handle the users in this topic one at a time:
Missbehaved stated: source post
At least she's not being a coward. I think that's a good quality to be true to oneself in the mist. I know she is not afraid to have her words associated on her plated reputation.
Courage.
So... basically the tried and true Ed attack by proxy? Instead of saying "You're a coward who fights behind a puppet", you're instead saying that Sugar is not so that you can appear to not be on the offensive through wielding implications for others to latch onto. For all you know, this could be Sugar attacking herself for more publicity, as anyone who has been watching this brand of drama has seen that WW3's attempt to attack her just grants her more allies and perceived strength and relevance.
If anyone really wanted to take Sugar down, the campaign would need to be handled in a way that makes her appear boring.
Missbehaved stated: source post
I think sugar should stay. I know she speaks her mind so you never gotta wonder what she means. I can appreciate traits in people.
I feel like that's all you can do...
Can you appreciate the bad traits too?
Missbehaved stated: source post
I don't need to put people down or insult them to feel good.
Why are you even here?
It'd be fun to see you attempt to insult someone.
Missbehaved stated: source post
The flaws you depict on me are just false tho. I'm pretty much a tease in real. I feel it's an unfair label because it's not like I tell anyone they have a chance. I never gave out to anyone.
Isn't being a tease... you telling everyone that they have a chance for the sake of the attention it brings without delivering a payoff?
Isn't that kind of like lying to people through false advertising?
Missbehaved stated: source post
Actually insulting people hurts me. I feel bad when I insult people.
An easy way to get over that is practice.
Missbehaved stated: source post
I just imagine them there in there rooms all sad and then I'm like "Awhh <\3 I can't do it."
What if they like it, are practically asking for it, deserve it, or need it to grow?
Missbehaved stated: source post
I actually think you're being unfair to sugar because she admitted she never wanted to rid of Jim. I defended Jim but I was never aggressive towards sugar. I just said he does not merit a ban.
Why do you feel the need to involve yourself at all?
Missbehaved stated: source post
The thing is I never get this invested for just myself in the aim of fire.
It does create a sort of magnetism to have others fire for you however. It's both noncommittal and lazy, as the ones fighting beside you (if not for you) are the ones who end up drawing more flak despite your instigation.
I defend myself when it is necessary as I am defending another person. I like to defend others. I came I n when Jim was in the aim. I came in when sugar was in the aim. I reinforced mee on his points when he was in the aim. Try insulting me without insulting anyone else and watch me not give a fuck.
So... you just defend whoever is being targeted?
Interesting.
Missbehaved stated: source post
No I know sugar wants tc's attention now.
Does she..?
I thought she meant that she wanted Jim banned at first. She admitted she used an example for a point.
...people need to grow a sense of humor ffs.
I just cleared the air Jim does not merit a bad. I see you show up saying she merits a ban. I know she does not merit a ban. It's obvious you did not understand she did not mean it.
How is this any different from the "Who likes [username] here" thread mimicry gag?
Diesel Potato stated: source post
Diesel Potato stated: source post
From the virgin who shamelessly throws herself at anything with a dick. I have a question for you... How long did it take Tryptamine to get sick of you? Even after you sent him all that money... You couldnt even buy the love of a junkie. How does it feel to be that pathetic?
Missbehaved stated: source post
Lol you haven't seen me in real the way I have rejecred so many men. You know my username not my story bastard.
I have no further comments.
Is it really a point of pride to reject "so many men"? That's... kind of sad in it's own way.
Missbehaved stated: source post
I must defend myself if I'm gonna defend others. It's obvious you can't defend someone if you can't defend oneself. Come at me alone. Do not attack anyone else. I want to see you do that. Forgive everyone else and take out your anger on me.
You defend others so that you don't have to fight alone. If you end up targeted after the fact, you then have those whose side you ran to running to yours. You don't know how to fight someone alone, and you never will if you keep piggybacking off of other people's strength.
It's actually the other way around: It's those that can't defend themselves that can't defend someone else. You make it obvious how ineffective you'd be at it, which makes you fairly easy to dismiss. If you want your words to have some bite, they need teeth, not dentures.
Missbehaved stated: source post
Well if someone who can't defends themselves defends you then obviously they aren't a good defense. I dare you to come at me alone.
Is... this saying you aren't a good defense?
You ought to come at someone alone sometime.
Missbehaved stated: source post
I don't storm out.... I'm on vacation.
That's an interesting defense.
I'm in and out. So please come at me.
You don't really want that as a self admitted tease and rejecter of men.
Damien stated: source post
Her cuntiness already has it's own thread and it's really not an argument for a ban.
It has several, but what surfaced in this one is fascinating. On one hand, it's interesting who will run to Sugar's defense when she doesn't need it, on the other there's how people responded to it being turned in their direction from a complete unknown, and on the third mutant hand it's amazing how much of a lack of sight and a sense of humor was shown here.
So serious guys, jeez.
Damien stated: source post
This is a preposterous statement, hinting to an unreasonably high perception of the impact your words have upon your fellow SC members and your inability to understand that there are other things to do aside of commenting in threads, which caused the delay, likely hints to your tendency of not doing much throughout the day.
You don't really strike me as a busy person personally. I see you online during all sorts of hours... sleeplessly if you aren't on a system of naps.
Your defense going in a more general "your fellow SC members" direction has a weird way of making it seem like your post is really about yourself. As this topic goes on it further showcases how much you actually care.
Damien stated: source post
Assuming that one needs to be emotionally effected in a negative way to make a reply is also very naive of you. Would you feel insecure knowing that your attempts at making others unhappy are futile?
The replies in this topic don't exactly look positive...
How do you know if that was even the goal? The OP doesn't even look that angry, it more so went in this direction as people began acting on it like it was serious. It's also hardly futile when people are responding defensively like this.
Damien stated: source post
I was merely sharing my observations, though the seeking flaws of others to deflect from your own statement might be the reason behind your current behavior.
We all know what Ad Hominem is at this point, there's no need to explain it.
I sleep well when I get to it, nothing was 'imagined' so far.
How often is "when I get to it"?
If you don't like the way people see you, might as well change your approach.
Do you like the way people see you, as your approach looks largely unchanged.
Damien stated: source post
Missing some less relevant replies does not make me illiterate. Calling me retarded is incorrect and uncalled for.
Wow...
Damien stated: source post
I did nothing to make you this butthurt. If my presence troubles you so much, git.
How pompous. The puppet is attacking, not recoiling. You seem more troubled by comparison honestly, as the puppet just looks like a series of gnashing teeth in a blender with some past relevance to trigger people.
Seriously, this is like Jim triggering Alter level shenanigans.
Damien stated: source post
I wasn't defending anyone telling how some accusation is not sufficient for a ban. You seem too involved in the matter.
So knowing some SC history makes a person "too involved in the matter"? Has no one noticed how quickly the Potato dropped the ban platform in favor of mocking those participating within this topic? "The matter" is a red herring, a referential joke, while those responding shine a spotlight on themselves.
Damien stated: source post
You really want to be impactful so much? Try harder, I'll tell you if you ever succeed.
You won't tell that intentionally, only through your actions and insistence of the contrary.
Diesel Potato stated: source post
Alright... let me try a little harder for you... Does it bother you that you go around showing off your pencil dick and hitting on the dumbest girls on the forum and still the closest thing youve gotten to success is when Angee used you to piss off another guy? I bet that attention felt really good.
Damien stated: source post
Incorrect yes or no question is not a good question at all. Try another one.
So what is your closest success?
Damien stated: source post
Getting bored of it.
Classic avoidance claim.
Damien stated: source post
After she became too annoying, interfering with the public chats, to put an end to it...
Try some other approach. No luck thus far.
I dunno, this topic is pretty golden in it's own right.
Okay there's almost nothing to reply to between Sugar and the puppet as she's just laughing at the free attention and he's just rawly attacking. It's easier to question people's weird defenses.
Why do people defend Sugar anyway? Does she seem like she needs it? If she wasn't so indifferent towards said supporters I'd almost say that they made her defense weaker by merely standing next to her.
Sugar stated: source post
the most antagonistic i've seen her be is when she ripped raven apart in Dear WFE in response to goading.
Where'd this happen?
lol wth is this thread?
You're all retarded.
Yeah Sugar is a cunt and she's not even a good troll.
But if being a cunt and a lame troll were to become a reason to ban people, SC would not exist.
In other words, if Sugar gets banned, then everybody who's ever been a cunty lameass troll would also have to get banned.
Fair's fair.
Turncoat would have to ban himself too.
X'DD
So potato face... bad argument.
Make a thread about smthg else for a change, silly.
Edit: Reading back over this thread, my suspicions that you're not a WW3 puppet are growing.
Ima step away from this one, this time.
I've seen this weird hairsplitting ritual you old nabble regulars do enough times, now.
I still think it's strange, but if my suspicions about the puppet's identity are correct, it's none of my business this time.
Enjoy your... whatever this is...
shrugs, waves and walks off
"doing it from your main account is better imo, despite the fact that they have more history and your own vulnerabilities are known and can be thrown back at you."
Hm... depends on whose puppet. I can think of one female member for whom that is absolutely not true. I caught her on a sock once, 3 or 4 months ago and told her exactly what her tell is, hoping she won't do it again. I like her and I'd like to see more of her. She gets attacked, tho. If she prefers a sock I can talk to a puppet as easily as I can talk to somebody on their main.
If I like a person, I like them. If I really don't like the person, their annoying quirks will eventually show through their puppet personas as well.
Haha, yeah, I guess if it's TK, a puppet would be better. Doubt the Potato person is a huge target here though, they seem articulate at least.
Probably the best thing with using a puppet to attack is seeding paranoia, imo. The target (and others) might get paranoid and suspect people who didn't have anything to do with it, causing more conflicts and looking silly. I know what this did to me with the TLW episode XD