Edvard stated: source post
This might help you.
some shitty leaves, probably shit site.
"Search google for "DBT"" -> Dialectical Behavior Therapy -> what the fuck is this shit -> "s a cognitive behavioral treatment that was originally developed to treat chronically suicidal individuals diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and it is now recognized as the gold standard psychological treatment for this population."
Ah, so this is what you applied to Sinister.
-
Gather around children, gather and witness.
Witness the cluelessness. Witness and learn. One day you will have a choice. You can choose to be like the subject at hand, or you can better your live and grow. Think outside yourself, think outside the box that you are in. Did you know that sea turtles cannot outgrow the pool in which they live in, but will grow more forever if there is space?
Seriously though, what are you, 15?
So children, what would you make of this question?
Lets make it a bullet list!
• Implies superiority via maturity
• Implies that the subject is more mature then the wise one.
• Implies that the definition of his maturity is a good thing
So children, lets discuss each point.
• This gives the impression of a narcissistic and condescending(as its often with narcissistic themed responses) based on an arbitrary and in general irrelevant attribute. It means the subject is very likely to dismiss people of younger age in a discussion where such dismissal would make no sense.
• Normally this could be true. But the subject has a recorded history in the data files. If we do a data mining technique, we can mine the data we need and see that the subject has proven, beyond the shadow of a doubt, of being one of the least mature people in the general area which he presents himself to the wise one.
• This could be true. But most often the perception people have of maturity is flawed and makes them caged and restricted. Closes their minds and makes them bigoted. Basically, fucking stupid. And if we look at the history of the subject at hand, we can determine that the most likely possibility is that he is unaware of what maturity really is. Therefor stupid.
Now children, what do you think the subject wanted to tell us?
Well, its possible this was a conclusion of his ramble below, which the wise one has not read yet. But its also possible its an attack on the wise one's character, either conscious or subconscious attack. He could be doing this as a troll, or maybe he is hating on the wise one. Which would be very well precised by the wise one. However history of the subject has show that this is most likely not the case. As the wise one always says, always follow the empirical data in the data bank, when the logical one is empty. As this is a purely empirical statement on the side of the subject.
But children, what has the subject actually achieved?
He lowered the possibility of the ramble below to be coherent by a margin, due his previous history and the possibilities examined above.
In addition, it just proves to the wise one even further that the subject is not too intelligent. But this is a common thing around these parts and this is what the wise one expected.
Your post seems to me as if coming from someone who feels caged and frustrated, and indulges in selfinduced emotional highs like drugs. Someone with little reasons or opportunities to feel intense and varied emotions around real life people and events, so he creates an inner world and loses himself in experiencing it. Pretty much like kids, living powerful emotions in made-up worlds, pretending to be Lord Sidious or smth. Maybe this joy of "hate" that you feel is thrilling for being very different from the lack of stimulation and numbness real life gives you,
Now the first thing the wise one makes note of here, is the ending. It ends with a comma. This makes the wise one disturbed and less inclined to be nice. A well structured sentence should remain such and a comma destroys this structure and this is quite unfortunate as it makes the world a worse and less structured place.
The next thing to make point of is that the subject has missed the point, as it is to be expected by a casual. Perhaps the subject wants a real response, the wise one hopes he is disappointed by the events unfolding.
What the subject has said here requires the wise one to repeat what the wise one has already said. And this does make the wise one frustrated. Which is not good for the subject at hand. Fortunately the wise one deems this response clever and funny, so he doesn't feel need the insult the subject. The wise one is tempted to repeat himself for the subject, but he knows from the subjects history that this is a pointless effort.
The wise one wants to teach the children an important lesson:
The subject used very special words in a special order that gives them a special meaning: "post seems to me". As you can see, not everything that seems like something to you is necessarily true and you, my children, should always consider yourself to be wrong before making a statement, unless you do not mind coming out as a fool, or if the statement is not so important and you have a margin of error. Unlike the subject here, who contradicts the statements he said directly with those that the wise one has said earlier in the "hate" lesson.
Not sure how to express what I mean but I sense in you what I often sense in people longing for destruction, apocalypse, anarchy scenarios. I think many people today are fed up with normal routine they don't want, dare or are able to change on their own. There's this general hum of massive energy bottled up in society. If implosions happen, a lot of people will miss the peace they lost.
And here we can see that even the subject doesn't know what he means. This is something the wise one almost never experiences. For he is wise.
Next we can observe how the subject has yet again proven that he has not grasp of first "hate" lesson the wise one has offered to the public. What the subject continues to express is just a failure to communicate after a failure to communicate. The inability to acknowledge the original "hate" lesson shows more signs of bigotry towards the subject, as he ignores the lesson in the back of his mind and replaces the information with what he thinks, even if it contradicts the lesson directly. This, children, is impressive. And requires more observation and study.
At the end of the subject's ramble, perhaps he is trying to not come off too harsh, but the wise one wages this possibility as probably wrong, but still undecided. The subject tries to move his own condescending tone in another area, to maybe make the reply less concentrated on it? The wise one will observe and continue to add to the data bank until a conclusion with a good amount of probability chances is made. If any of you children has insight on this, please share it with the wise one. The wise one knows he is only almost all knowing.
---
The wise one wants to make sure that all subject that wish to contact the wise one here know that they will be treated as they deserve. So fear not! Unless you should. In that case, learn from the lessons of the wise one. Maybe you will reach enlightenment. Probably not.
The wise one wants to make a point of his own awesomeness, by noting that he made each comment after reading each quoted part above, before reading the rest. And all of the wise ones predictions came true as he read the rest. This is how the wise one foresees the future.
Now some of you children might think the wise one is mocking the subject. You children get a grade of A+.
At this point, grade A students, you should make the subject angry, or otherwise upset, or any other passionate emotion, or even not so passionate. This brings out more of his substance and you can observe and study it better. A good strategy is to make note of what the subject was most passionately talking about and post something to either validate him or to invalidate him, both work, for me: i choose depending on how i feel like.
