Irrelevant who started it.
You spin it out of the context which is that you attack her, even if its return fire, then she said she will attack back.
And somehow thats bad. While you make it look like she just said that completely unprovoked, out of the blue.
Not to mention "They're the ones who attacked first", they attacked you with words on a screen xD , so you gona maim them xD. Totally reasonable.
I don't mind meeting anyone here, thought i can't say i remember everyone here, so i where we would meet would depend on individual case study. But unlike you i don't have any intention to maim anyone for any reason, unless they try something first, in which case, just like in sugar's response in its original context, it is reasonable to fight back.
If i attack thought, i (probably) do not need to attack again after and do not expect any kind of a fair fight whatsoever. I am not in it for the fight as many of the 'righteous' and self proclaimed 'moral' people are.