Sociopath Community

proof? or has jim successfully trolled you? :P

something i told ana in PM, and only ana. jim somehow knows about it. you have already admitted you and your brother can access and view our PMs, so why not jim who you are allowing to supposedly fix the code here? and explain how he would have known about a private conversation between us? i highly doubt ana went running her mouth off about it to jim..it's obvious at this point

Luna Prey: i could if i wanted but the truth is im too lazy to go digging into the database to learn petty stuff about people who cant get me ahead in my career :P

riiiiight.

Luna Prey: you guys are such IT ignorant losers you think a database doesnt have data in it

even better

okay, so you have no proof, just heard from someone else. you think jim has access to our database? he never has, and never will,... I won't waste any more of my time dispelling this rumor since sugar is just being an ugly troll as usual

angee says she will create a thread which will discuss making the PM system just like the public chat system -- Meaning if someone PM's you, and you are not online to see it, then you will not see the PM when you log on. PM's will only show for that moment, and then they are gone forever. 

This will stop the data-basing of chat conversations, and any rumor that I care about what you losers say, or that other's have access to your private conversations.

if you guys support this change, i would not mind implementing it. it completely agrees with my ideals for user privacy.

I vote against.

I sometimes miss PMs. I'd like to see them

luna, someone you have put into a position of trust here (jim) is either genuinely viewing my PMs or is trying to make me think he has..either way the buck stops with you and your 'team'.

also, the least you could do is assure us you would never breach our privacy by reading our PMs out of respect, rather than cos you think we are lame or whatever..

but like, if i really wanted to talk to you, i would pm you when i knew you were online and talking in chat.  i wouldnt let you miss it, neither would anyone else. not trying to change your mind, just letting you know that people will keep trying and not mind.

jim is not in a position of trust. do you have proof for that either or do you just believe everything jim says? 

jim once, for a version of SC we no loner use, got to access our code on GITHUB with the intent of working on it. he was unable to understand the code, and we revoked his privileges to see it. not once during any of that time did he have access to the server or database itself. just some files on git hub that he was unable to comprehend.

you are dull to believe something so obvious sugar, dont waste my time with your ignorant whining

that's the only logical explanation as to how he knew about what we spoke about. and luna if you wanna get personal i can break you again. you let me know what you want, k?