Turncoat stated: source post
Such evasive ad hominem attacks.
Turncoat stated: source post
He has invalidation arguments against males too, but they tend to be more about their specifics. He needs to invalidate them as a person once he gets weary of the actual argument, which explains why when he'd argue with Spatial that it'd become so personal on both sides instead of about the original topic itself from them both being prone to this in their own ways.
He has a myriad of excuses for my behavior towards him so that he can resume his mental status quo, and they always come out after he's either become winded or has no actual response left. It's basically an admission that he's given up on that area when that's where he goes, and from it he likely aims to change the discussion to one that'd be easier for him. I could for instance respond to his "pussy whipped" accusation defensively, bringing up topics where I've gone against him without Crow being the focus, bringing up how it tends to be the focus because of how often he targets her from thinking that she's "easy", but then it'd become about that instead for his own convenience.
Turncoat stated: source post
She is about relevance, Berk is about being a joke.
Turncoat stated: source post
Edvard stated: source post
You calling people here jokes and irrelevant shows unprecedented arrogance, Turn. Hence my pussy remark.
...but it's Berk, if Asta's genuine then she clearly has no idea what's going on, and you're not above this sort of invalidation yourself. At least mine's based on a past history that's formed outside of these arguments with a more-than searchable post history to show why I think these things, yours is instead solely from the fact that I'm arguing against you.
And just like that, you've found a tangent of convenience. If you're going to try this hard to change the argument so that you have a leg to stand on, I'm going to step back from it since you at that point must be arguing for the sake of it solely. It's pointless to continue when you do that.
Edit: Wait... How is arrogance a sign of being whipped by pussy?
Turncoat stated: source post
Your changing of arguments in the name of your own convenience I'm not going to entertain right now.
Turncoat stated: source post
WW3 stated: source post
...but it's Berk
and?
We've discussed my views of you to death. Search it up if you've forgotten.
false in bold
non bold = not backed with any evidence or reasoning
Turncoat stated: source post
Edvard stated: source post
You've also evaded the whole voice request thing when I asked you for it and passed it on to Turncoat.
Evasion, or disinterest? She didn't write one up for anyone, and nothing says that she'd have to ​other than your constant insistence to the contrary.
Maybe if you don't want to be considered evasive, show it instead of just saying it's not so.
See the above^
As for Alena, she just jumps in the opposite camp from me with every little chance she gets. Pay more attention to her and see the pattern. It had nothing to do with you, but everything to do with her.~
I've watched her for a while, and she's taken sides with people she's in another topic opposed. However, naturally, there are those who can't be sided with from looking too ridiculous to take up the arguments of, and for those people she's never bothered to. I'd personally say that's pretty normal. She also has chosen to not argue at all in many topics where you're making yourself out to be... this, so it's clearly not "every little chance she gets". I wouldn't even say it's that often, simply often enough to be noticed.
Edvard stated: source post
And that's just from the top of my head, and MY questions.
FFS, why are you entitled to answers?
Her dumb point was: if Crow has to answer a question, then everyone should answer the same q for themselves. I agree with this, if they get asked the question. But no one asked about any of the other's choices of words/top3, because it makes sense to ask only if you are confused about something.
That entitlement of yours...
Edvard stated: source post
^ This doesn't answer anything except: Is Crow an obnoxious stuck-up? You didn't answer Berk, then I asked you. Then Astamiss. Then Cricket herself. Your last posts are just empty words and excuses for getting out of uncomfortable situations.
I'd say this looks more like you're trying to create uncomfortable situations when things don't go your way.
Congratulations, so far you've managed to answer: 0 times.
/entitlement
