Edvard stated: source post
Fuck, talk about pitting someone against another...
Fuuuuuuuuck. You are so blatant.
Well I just want to make sure you know that I do know what the inquiry is about.
"Why did crow say cricket was untrustworthy?". I can dissect this if that helps.
So crow said cricket was untrustworthy. It is a negative comment that did not come with an explanation. It does not show me the experiences crow has gone through to come to the conclusion. I wondered about the process that went through her mind when she came to the conclusion.
It does not even make sense to assume that I do not understand. I asked and even had assumptions for possible answers. I would not be able to make assumptions of possibilities without understanding the main point. It would make sense if you are not referring to the simple inquiry in of itself. It means you might be referring to something different.
Turncoat stated: source post
TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post
Edvard stated: source post
Fuck, talk about pitting someone against another...
Fuuuuuuuuck. You are so blatant.
He did try to make nice pretty damn hard once he saw Cricket agreeing with us...
Interesting.
I'm just here for the food, guise
TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post
Edvard stated: source post
Fuck, talk about pitting someone against another...
Fuuuuuuuuck. You are so blatant.
He did try to make nice pretty damn hard once he saw Cricket agreeing with us...
Interesting. Could this be another example of Female Handling 101?