Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 10218
HAPPY BIRTHDAY

To clarify, this is about the Cricket accusation, not about the conversation you'd prefer right now about reiterating how I feel in particular about specific people here (things I've openly expressed in older topics as to why, something you only see as shitty from it attacking your supposed supporters), and I already stated that the only one who really has reason to want to know is Cricket. You don't really give a crap beyond wanting to make Crow "squirm" as you claim to see this as, showing the Cricket thing to be another tangent of convenience, but we might as well finish those off before we start new ones. 

Posts: 10218
HAPPY BIRTHDAY

WW3 stated: source post

...but it's Berk

and?               

 We've discussed my views of you to death. Search it up if you've forgotten. 

Posts: 3645
HAPPY BIRTHDAY

^

What Berk said.

If you're going to bitch and whine about him Turncoat, then trash Cadaver as well when he does the exact same things.

And Cadaver does do the exact same things Berk does.

Fuck, I think Cad's one of the people Berk is mimicking when he tries to be an annoying douche. lol

Posts: 1581
HAPPY BIRTHDAY

you've made zero point with your baseless claims.

Posts: 1581
HAPPY BIRTHDAY

you've made zero point with your baseless claims.

Posts: 10218
HAPPY BIRTHDAY

Cadaver and I have butted heads in the past.

Wait, the exact same? Go on, this should be interesting. 

Posts: 1566
HAPPY BIRTHDAY

Cadaver stated: source post

"you need this victory"

another classic - lovin it

Ed keeps placing himself in a canyon waiting for ambush. Its only inevitable. 

Turncoat stated: source post

 

Edvard stated: source post

I am also by far the least secretive here.

Wait what?  

 

LOL 

Edvard stated: source post

"Asta and WW3 don't count" was your own argument, not mine. It was a shitty one.

Point me to more then 5 posts where WW3 is talking about someone and is not talking bullshit(aka not just being negative, but just random shit that he took out of his ass) againts a person. And i think you will have trouble with even 5 xD 

Xena stated: source post

^

What Berk said.

If you're going to bitch and whine about him Turncoat, then trash Cadaver as well when he does the exact same things.

And Cadaver does do the exact same things Berk does.

Fuck, I think Cad's one of the people Berk is mimicking when he tries to be an annoying douche. lol

Cadaver doesn't usually post personal attacks when he is shit posting. He is actually funny too.
Your ability to recognize puppets is equal to the ability of a fish to breathe air.

---

Posts: 557
HAPPY BIRTHDAY

Edvard stated: source post

I edited the secretive part, it was a ESL mistake.

"she clearly has no idea what's going on "

Holy shit, you are even more patronizing now. Are you calling Astamiss too dumb to understand a simple q, why did Crow list Cricket as the most untrustworthy?

Whipped by pussy is the only explanation I can come up with regarding your change of attitude and argumentation in this context.

Turncoat stated: source post

 

Edvard stated: source post

You calling people here jokes and irrelevant shows unprecedented arrogance, Turn. Hence my pussy remark.

...but it's Berk, if Asta's genuine then she clearly has no idea what's going on, and you're not above this sort of invalidation yourself. At least mine's based on a past history that's formed outside of these arguments with a more-than searchable post history to show why I think these things, yours is instead solely from the fact that I'm arguing against you.
 

I do understand the inquiry at hand. I even asked it earlier on because I was curious. It seems rather demeaning. I mean unless...

1. You are referring to some background knowledge I have not been around long enough to know. It might be a past event.

2. You almost have the urge to explain to me the reasoning and you are resisting. I have made a lot of assumptions so it shows I do not know much about crow or cricket at this point in time. In this case it could mean you see that I do not know cricket or crow well enough to understand.

You might be thinking

"She does not understand it has nothing to do with her though I see she had some doubts."

"She does not understand crow or cricket in a way she could make proper assumptions."

3. You are referring to the fact I do not understand the reasoning crow holds. In this case it would apply to most members so I assume this is not the case.

 

 

 

Posts: 1121
HAPPY BIRTHDAY

Edvard stated: source post

I edited the secretive part, it was a ESL mistake.

"she clearly has no idea what's going on "

Holy shit, you are even more patronizing now. Are you calling Astamiss too dumb to understand a simple q

Holy fuck.  You are so blatant.

Posts: 1121
HAPPY BIRTHDAY

Cricket stated: source post

Guise... All this arguing and I don't even have any issues with Crow. C'mon it was one comment in one thread. If Crow and I had actual problems with each other, we are completely capable of discussing it on our own.

I kinda thought that this would just blow over. It really should have by now...

Eds frustrated love for me will never blow over. : P

This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.