lol Hired.
Sure I can, you act as if being a woman is shameful and only a women would ever go against you because emotions and not because your nonsense is just so stinky.
That didn't look like teasing...you legit got mad. Wanna know how i know? The angry words came out: Bud, Pal,Coward 😛
And I did explain whats so bullshitty about your persona- you try to make anyone else who has not given you what you feel is an adequate enough response explain themselves when it was infact adequate enough. You claim they're evasive when hey...you are too.
When cornered you try to distract by pitting people against each other- you've done it enough and when confronted by a puppet you automatically assume its a woman BECAUSE NO WAY WOULD THAT EVER BE A DUDE IT HAS TO BE A WOMAN BECAUSE MAN OH MAN THEY SURE ARE BEING BITCHY. C'mon dude.
Edvard stated: source post
Crow didn't answer because she didn't feel like it~ Not evasion, but disinterest or lazyness... which made her type a small novel instead.
You mean the small novel you dismiss from it not being the answer you wanted, but instead a discussion on your motives?
Anal Rage stated: source post
only a women would ever go against you
What the fuck? Is this for real XD A lot more men go against me than women.
That didn't look like teasing...you legit got mad. Wanna know how i know? The angry words came out: Bud, Pal,Coward 😛
It was provocative. I do that a lot.
And I did explain whats so bullshitty about your persona- you try to make anyone else who has not given you what you feel is an adequate enough response explain themselves when it was infact adequate enough. You claim they're evasive when hey...you are too.
Go reread the definition of bullshit. That's not bullshit. I am evasive when it comes to personal info here, not when it comes to arguing my opinions.
Also, you mentioned the puppet calling me out on my bullshit. I asked you to clarify, because I only recall some insults from that puppet, without any proof.
When cornered you try to distract by pitting people against each other- you've done it enough and when confronted by a puppet you automatically assume its a woman BECAUSE NO WAY WOULD THAT EVER BE A DUDE IT HAS TO BE A WOMAN BECAUSE MAN OH MAN THEY SURE ARE BEING BITCHY. C'mon dude.
That's how you saw it. I had other reasons based on past interaction with a female here in pm. I also think I was wrong, and the puppet wasn't her after all.
Crow requested my motives and I shared them in one paragraph.
" So the goal of the game was not to have me refuse to justify my opinion, but was in fact to make me talk a lot? "
The goal was to bring you to the point of a silly cop-out from doing the impossible: providing good arguments for your opinion. Getting you to type was the fun.
And I did explain whats so bullshitty about your persona- you try to make anyone else who has not given you what you feel is an adequate enough response explain themselves when it was infact adequate enough. You claim they're evasive when hey...you are too.
Go reread the definition of bullshit. That's not bullshit.
Semantics, again? Jesus christ, learn a new trick.
Edvard stated: source post
TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post
Just to be clear, the logic here is that because there's something I don't care to discuss with you, I must have no reasons for thinking it?
With me, Berk, Criket, Asta.
Yes. Evidence says so.
Not really sure if Berk and Asta count...
The only one who ought to count is Cricket, and that could be resolved in a PM, having you not be any the wiser on it and still complaining about not having your questions answered.