Sociopath Community

Edvard stated: source post

 

TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post

That has everything to do with me and nothing to do with anyone else. 

Fixed it for you :D 

 

TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post

A) My motivations are suspect (an idea that Ed has been pushing for quite some time)

or (could also be "and")

B) I am evasive (another idea Ed has been pushing)

You've already evaded the question before, when it was on topic. Why?

You've also evaded the whole voice request thing when I asked you for it and passed it on to Turncoat.

Maybe if you don't want to be considered evasive, show it instead of just saying it's not so.

I didn't answer two questions ever.  Oh the horror. : P

As for Alena, she just jumps in the opposite camp from me with every little chance she gets. Pay more attention to her and see the pattern. It had nothing to do with you, but everything to do with her.~

 Are you actually capable of arguing against someones points, instead of trying to undermine their credibility on a personal level?

Edvard stated: source post

 

TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post

I didn't answer two questions ever.  Oh the horror. : P

 

Edvard stated: source post

You've already evaded the question before, when it was on topic. Why?

Three.

I answered that one earlier in this topic.

Edvard stated: source post

"Many mentally ill people neither want nor need to be cured."

What kind of mental illnesses do you have in mind?

Four.

And that's just from the top of my head, and MY questions.

hahahahahahaha  Now you're being ridiculous even for you.  Are you really going to count every instance of when anything with a question mark at the end went unaddressed, in any and all context?  Somehow I think if you counted that for anyone else, especially yourself, you'd get a lot higher than three. : P

You are being downright autistic.

 

 Are you actually capable of arguing against someones points, instead of trying to undermine their credibility on a personal level?

I did argue against Alena's points, in this thread.

Her dumb point was: if Crow has to answer a question, then everyone should answer the same q for themselves. I agree with this, if they get asked the question. But no one asked about any of the other's choices of words/top3, because it makes sense to ask only if you are confused about something.

I think there were more undertones (and overtones) than you're giving credit.

TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post

I didn't answer two questions ever.  Oh the horror. : P

Edvard stated: source post

You've already evaded the question before, when it was on topic. Why?

Three.

Edvard stated: source post

"Many mentally ill people neither want nor need to be cured."

What kind of mental illnesses do you have in mind?

Four.

And that's just from the top of my head, and MY questions.

 Are you actually capable of arguing against someones points, instead of trying to undermine their credibility on a personal level?

I did argue against Alena's points, in this thread.

Her dumb point was: if Crow has to answer a question, then everyone should answer the same q for themselves. I agree with this, if they get asked the question. But no one asked about any of the other's choices of words/top3, because it makes sense to ask only if you are confused about something.

TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post

I answered that one earlier in this topic.

Quote?

hahahahahahaha  Now you're being ridiculous even for you.  Are you really going to count every instance of when anything with a question mark at the end went unaddressed, in any and all context?  Somehow I think if you counted that for anyone else, especially yourself, you'd get a lot higher than three. : P

You are being downright autistic.

The forth question was from a debate we had from which you chickened out after it started going south for you: Serious discussion: is it ethical to cure autism?

"Downright autistic", "ridiculous even for me"...  Are you actually capable of arguing against my points without trying to undermine my credibility on a personal level?~

anastacia stated: source post

How do you not want to blow your brains out with this? Why am I so annoyed? What is life? I know you have the answers. 

lol

Cricket stated: source post

Edvard stated: source post

 

TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post

I answered that one earlier in this topic.

Quote?

I told you that I didn't care to discuss it with Berk and that if someone I did care to discuss it with asked, I'd have more to say.  To which you replied along the lines of "Fair enough".

If you still can't remember I'll go find it for you, but I'd rather not.  Quote digging is tedious without the old search function.

hahahahahahaha  Now you're being ridiculous even for you.  Are you really going to count every instance of when anything with a question mark at the end went unaddressed, in any and all context?  Somehow I think if you counted that for anyone else, especially yourself, you'd get a lot higher than three. : P

You are being downright autistic.

The forth question was from a debate we had from which you chickened out after it started going south for you: Serious discussion: is it ethical to cure autism?

I know what it's from, I recall the thread.  You're absolutely right.  I expressed an opinion.  You wanted to discuss it further.  And I ignored you.  I'm sorry for the hurt it's caused you.

Let me make a formal apology.  To anyone who wished to converse with me, discuss, argue, banter, chit chat, or what-have-you: If I didn't notice, forgot, had better things to do, or simply didn't give a fuck, I am truly sorry.  I can never fully express my regret at these transgressions.  It's just a shame that of all the thousands upon thousands of unanswered questions and unfinished discussions that have been had on this forum, Ed is the first with the courage to call it out for the personal failing that it is.  If only we could all be more like Ed.  Bravely and patiently answering every question ever asked of him.  A hero of his time.  A lion among sheep chickens.  Carry on soldier.  Carry on.

"Downright autistic", "ridiculous even for me"...  Are you actually capable of arguing against my points without trying to undermine my credibility on a personal level?~

 I multitask.

TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post

Oh dear, Berk asked a question and I didn't answer it.  God forbid. XD

^ This doesn't answer anything except: Is Crow an obnoxious stuck-up? You didn't answer Berk, then I asked you. Then Astamiss. Then Cricket herself. Your last posts are just empty words and excuses for getting out of uncomfortable situations.

Congratulations, so far you've managed to answer: 0 times.

Certainly invalidates my point about evasiveness and your difficulty of delivering straight answers. You always answer questions with 2 exceptions ("I didn't answer two questions ever. Oh the horror. : P "), just not when other people ask them XD God fucking forbid you stay on point, be open and carry on a normal conversation, you have to do all these verbose acrobatics believing you can fool your audience.

Edvard stated: source post

 

TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post

Oh dear, Berk asked a question and I didn't answer it.  God forbid. XD

^ This doesn't answer anything except: Is Crow an obnoxious stuck-up?

Try quoting the whole post, not just the first sentence. : P

You didn't answer Berk, then I asked you. Then Astamiss. Then Cricket herself. Your last posts are just empty words and excuses for getting out of uncomfortable situations.

Congratulations, so far you've managed to answer: 0 times.

Certainly invalidates my point about evasiveness and your difficulty of delivering straight answers. You always answer questions with 2 exceptions ("I didn't answer two questions ever. Oh the horror. : P "), just not when other people ask them XD God fucking forbid you stay on point, be open and carry on a normal conversation, you have to do all these verbose acrobatics believing you can fool your audience.

What am I trying to fool people into believing?  That I did in fact answer the three questions I did not?  Your personal bias gets ever more blatant.  Why is this even a discussion?  Because the world simply must know that I ignored three questions?  Honestly Ed, what is the matter with you?  What are you doing?

Edvard stated: source post

As for Alena, she just jumps in the opposite camp from me with every little chance she gets. Pay more attention to her and see the pattern. It had nothing to do with you, but everything to do with her.~

What.

How did it have everything to do with me? And in this thread YOU started it.

I just saw you doing what you always do- tryin to pit two fine fine laydees against each other. I figured everyone else saw it too.

Yesterday I wasnt even on you and I explained that you. I made an observation; You and palmer were arguing and then you said "sorry i didnt call you" trying to invalidate everything they were saying (valid points btw) by implying that they were:

A.) Female

And

B.)having an emotional outburst because you didnt call them.

It wasnt so much of an "attack" on you. I'm not trying to always have a go at you. It was merely an observation of how that particular interaction looked to me. It was  As if someone couldnt possibly call you out on your BS unless you've wronged them somehow~.  You were spouting that they didnt have balls, only ovaries because it was an account  you were unfamiliar with. As if only females go on puppets to "attack" you. So two things with that- you think only females are bitchy and unable to face you on their mains(also backstabby?) and you think none of the males here have the balls to go against you.

Maybe I'm wrong, I hope you can clear that up for me.