Mmm~ â¤
For now, you're right. I ought to give others some time to respond instead of over-saturating it with my own posts.
Um... the alignment topic was another example of you and Crow repeating the same stupidly incorrect statement over and over and over again.
That does get annoying, you know. Like if some blind kid who you know for a fact can't see your hair were to follow you around telling you your hair is purple.
Over and over and over again.
For anybody reading this debate for the first time: I believed my alignment to be chaotic neutral, not chaotic evil, and I stated my reasons. Crow and TC insisted that I believed otherwise, for w/e reason.
I actually did the test and scored true neutral.
Not sure what the whole stupid thing accomplished, except a waste of my afternoon proving those 2 wrong.
*Note: I've formally studied enough social sci and humanities to know my own mind. I don't need some silly online RPG test to determine my ethical bent.
Turncoat stated: source post
Xena stated: source post
Well yeah. I remind you bc you people don't seem to realize how little you actually matter in my life.
What does that have to do with anything? Are you sure that's not more for you than us?
It more often than not looks like an excuse.
Srsly? You wrote:
"You're the only one not seeing it's my guess, with only a few others potentially being there as well from reduced attendance.
There's others in this as well, but either they mostly reserve it for chat (so you may have missed some) or you've forgotten about them."
As if you're pulling rank or implying that you're some mondo kewell cogniscenti for having some in joke that I'm unaware of.
I'm not seeing bc idgaf about your little clique. Idk their catch phrases and Idk what they find amusing.
Because I don't care.
Your arguments are getting weaker, Turn.
Try harder. :D
Really? I see an unusual number of threads about me this week, Sys.
Didn't you say in chat last night that I reminded you of some kid you went to school with who got picked on all the time and thought he was popular?
So which is it? Are you telling me I'm popular, then?
:*
Alright fine, one more and then a break. Can't resist.
Xena stated: source post
As if you're pulling rank or implying that you're some mondo kewell cogniscenti for having some in joke that I'm unaware of.
I have no idea what a "mondo kewell cogniscenti" is, but I am aware that you seem to be one of the few to not get what's going on here. It's not pulling rank or an inside joke of our own doing, it's you missing the point on your own. Instead of looking around, you assume you already know, and from that close out other possibilities. It's been your pattern since before these events, but it doesn't showcase itself quite as hard as when you're arguing.
The alignment topic's a fairly good example, even down to the "Wooster Conspiracy" and other reaches. If there's multiple people with similar views on their own, you go towards conspiracy theories and herd mentality notions instead of addressing what's really going on.
I'm not seeing bc idgaf about your little clique. Idk their catch phrases and Idk what they find amusing.
Turncoat stated: source post
Tryptamine3 stated: source post
Xena, are you trying to make me antagonistic toward you? That's what it seems like.
She'd likely write you off as being a part of the "TC clique" if you became antagonistic towards her, so I doubt it.
Seriously, like I'd have a clique.
Because I don't care.
Seems more and more believable every time you say it.
This is a common ego-defense mantra, a way of attempting to separate your feelings from what's going on to keep yourself intact. It typically aims to either disconnect from the source or numb feelings entirely. It's usually a go-to for teenagers, but not everyone drops it as they grow up. A hint that it's that tends to be seen through how often it's used.
"You have nothing beyond users noticing the same things about you to suggest there is a collaborative effort going on. You should step back and ask why exactly each individual thinks the way they do about you."
Nope. They're misquoting, embellishing and blatantly fabricating stuff.
Then I correct them.
Then they go "haha. delusion."
And it's a very small group of people making this stuff up.
Everybody else is either confused, or they don't care.
There were two, one of which you made yourself (unless you count "This is where Judas is going").
"Really? I see an unusual number of threads about me this week, Sys."
The threads themselves are based off of your actions and wouldn't be there if you weren't behaving in such a fashion, you've been more active with your antics than usual.
"Didn't you say in chat last night that I reminded you of some kid you went to school with who got picked on all the time and thought he was popular?"
You remind me of the individuals I'd see that couldn't handle criticism, so like a narc developing a inflated ego as a coping mechanism, your defense is not only to assume you aren't wrong but that there's a fucking group dedicated to shaming you.
You have nothing beyond users noticing the same things about you to suggest there is a collaborative effort going on. You should step back and ask why exactly each individual thinks the way they do about you.
"So which is it? Are you telling me I'm popular, then?"
You are quality entertainment