Sociopath Community

Eh ? You went ahead and knowingly got yourself suspended ?

I never said Michael did anything against the spirit of this place, however he did modify whatshisname into pedo.

And it's that whiny game Ed. From the time you suspect foul play you start losing composure and freak out, just like your own example of knowingly getting yourself timed out.

Being an admin wouldn't excite me, nor was I enthusiastic about it, what makes you think I was jumping with joy over that ? It's a chore. You on the other hand were balling when Luna mentioned me being an admin.

See that ? It's you for sure.

"There's no rule but one to follow, and it isn't that. You're actually being governed by Ed, as you're mindful of his sensitive nagging over what you mustn't do."

You seem rather obsessed with Ed. Many of your posts either mention him or are directed at him.

The rules as Luna decided them state that if private information is posted, said person it pertains to has the right to have it removed. Pink adamantly denied that the information posted was her own, and so in accord with the rules, it was left up. What's the issue?

just realized, the thing i thought wasn't like you and was perhaps crow's influence was the posting of the PM, not the other stuff. lol.

Reading through the posts:

"Oh, that's a good point."

Another person says something with the other perspective.

"Know what?  I think he's right, now."

Next sentence with different position.

"Hmm, yeah I can see that."

So really, it's become a cartoonish "eeny meeny miney mo" or "tic tac toe" where what turn you are on, either evens or odds, makes the difference.  And that's all.

she later admitted it was hers and it still stayed up (it was purported to be her so not the same as me randomly saying 'its mine TC take it down'. her family was also called (lol) which i didn't think was necessary and reeked of personal bias. i don't have any issue with what he did. fucking hell guyz

read where i said (ok the rules). next time you imagine i've missed a detail, check that you haven't missed me finding that detail ;-)

I couldn't trust her on that while I could trust the person who I called.

She shortly after resumed saying it wasn't hers, that she was lying about that for someone else's sake, so hey, I went with the answer that remained consistent.

Looking over the entirety of what happened instead of just the fake begging yields more.

"Eh ? You went ahead and knowingly got yourself suspended?"
He's not alone in that, multiple people went that route. It's an approach that allows example to guide others' behaviors like a martyr faced with lesser risks. In some cases that makes more sense than sitting back or, even worse, going along with or even agreeing with it simply because of that person having power.

In his case it's a matter of outspoken integrity, even if it sometimes happens a little too quickly.

"You on the other hand were balling when Luna mentioned me being an admin."
He doesn't share your views on how you'd be running the place.

"See that ? It's you for sure."
Blaming him solely is missing a few other potential dimensions at play here. It's not like that conclusion came to him out of nowhere. Tryp sees it too, in a sense:

Tryptamine
"You seem rather obsessed with Ed. Many of your posts either mention him or are directed at him."

There's also the Spatial/Edvard fanfic phase that happened as well as a slew of older comments related to your "relationship" of sorts. His response isn't really one that comes from nowhere, it comes from a lengthy history of interaction. He's against moderation and he's not a fan of you, so imagine how someone'd feel if their fairly obsessive and arguably narcissistic antagonist managed to fill those shoes.

Hey, I'm glad to do it!  It warms my heart to help out.  I know how important this is to everyone's life.  This is no time for frivolity.