whenever i hear someone use the phrase "taste in music", i automatically assume that they have some sort of bias towards a certain type of terrible music and thinks everything else is terrible garbage.
when all music is, objectively speaking, terrible garbage. yes, even beethoven.
my assumptions are correct approximately 100% of the time
by Turncoat
by cute kittenwhenever i hear someone use the phrase "taste in music", i automatically assume that they have some sort of bias towards a certain type of terrible music and thinks everything else is terrible garbage.
when all music is, objectively speaking, terrible garbage. yes, even beethoven.
my assumptions are correct approximately 100% of the time
Wouldn't all music being garbage define "garbage" as the relative average, making none of them garbage when compared to one another?
objectively speaking, music is subjective.
no, that's not right. musical taste is subjective.
music is just music; whether it's all good or all garbage or some good or some garbage is all a matter of opinion.
anyway yeah in regards to your reply here
i'm not sure why you're trying to parse the logical implications of my obvious joke post, but the answer to your question is yes.
funny how ultra-hipster logic doesn't make any sense when examined under a critical lens, no?
by cute kittenwhenever i hear someone use the phrase "taste in music", i automatically assume that they have some sort of bias towards a certain type of terrible music and thinks everything else is terrible garbage.
when all music is, objectively speaking, terrible garbage. yes, even beethoven.
my assumptions are correct approximately 100% of the time
Wouldn't all music being garbage define "garbage" as the relative average, making none of them garbage when compared to one another?
