That is all.
Such a nice argument in favor of The Law of Correspondence in the sense of the idea that reality as we perceive it is simply a mirror of what is going on inside of us.
By that principle, if you want people to seem less retarded, you must first yourself be less retarded.
a) Not publishing a paper, just regurgitating data about something that's questionably related for the sake of a joke. It's about as close to plagiarism as embedding a youtube video and making a joke after the fact.
b) It's referred to as a "law". I'm not the type of person to invent terms with a word like that, so of course I didn't make it up.
Plagiarism is trying to pass an idea off as my own. I never said that "The law of Correspondence" was something of my own invention. It's referential with light elements of parody, learn the difference.
http://www.iempowerself.com/75_law_of_correspondence.html
Plagiarism...
by TurncoatSuch a nice argument in favor of The Law of Correspondence in the sense of the idea that reality as we perceive it is simply a mirror of what is going on inside of us.
By that principle, if you want people to seem less retarded, you must first yourself be less retarded.