Sociopath Community

Your opinion is a bit short-sighted, don't you think? It doesn't matter if all Arab Muslims are evil. You get rid of them all, problem solved. Same thing with ants, or fleas. You kill them all and there is no more problem. I don't understand your problem with this way of thinking. In the end, might is right. The mightiest will survive, so what's the problem with ending the threat now or should we have more casualties on our side? If there is a threat, it must be eliminated, plain and simple. If that means genocide, then genocide it is.

Yes, they are extremists, but if we don't eliminate the threat completely then they will rear their ugly heads again at some point. Why not just eliminate the threat completely and not have to worry about it again, in the future. It's not racial, it's just common sense, as far as I can tell.

by Bobby Elvis

Are you of the mind that we are disordered, or that we are the next step in the evolutionary chain? Personally, I am blinded by what we could accomplish if TPTB weren't so concerned with civilian casualties and the 'little guy'. Granted that the people in power may be closer to us than the average joe, but they are still accountable to lobbyists, voters, etc. Their livelihood depends on pleasing the masses. But what if we had people in power who had no fear of doing what is necessary, imagine what we could get done.

For example; if there were a button that you could push that would blast every arab, muslim man, woman and child on the face of the earth into dust, would you do it to eliminate the threat? Without regard to the possibility that some of those people weren't terrorists and might not present a threat?

 I would assume when you were referring to fear. You were referring to having no fear of killing millions of people and, no fear of the consequences. If that is the case. Then I would have to say no. Who is to say the Muslims are not just for having done what they believe in there heart to be right.

Every culture and religon have there extremists. Those of us who promote hatred. Will succumb to hatred.

Have you seen what they line up to worship?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Stone

The Black Stone (Arabic: الحجر الأسود‎ al-Ḥajar al-Aswad) is the eastern cornerstone of the Kaaba, the ancient stone building toward which Muslims pray, in the center of the Grand Mosque in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. It is revered by Muslims as an Islamic relic which, according to Muslim tradition, dates back to the time of Adam and Eve.[1]

They will eliminate themselves as soon as they evolve over the next few decades.

No. So, you are advocating genocide and a White race?  Insecure, and simplistic minded.  Have a bit of Us vs. Them?

That is the biggest line of bullshit I have ever heard. I look like I could be one of them. My family looks like they could be one of them. A lot of people could be one of them. There is nothing wrong with Muslims or Arabs. 

There are extremists. They are named that because they are extreme.

I remember once that Hilary Clinton called the Mexican Drug War a Narco Insurgency.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/sep/09/hillary-clinton-mexican-drug-war-insurgency

Hillary Clinton has sparked anger in Mexico by comparing its drug-related violence to an insurgency and hinting that US troops may need to intervene.

The US secretary of state said Mexico's level of car bombings, kidnappings and mayhem resembled Colombia a generation ago. She floated the prospect of US military advisers being sent to Mexico and central America.

She was later seen retracting her comment, no doubt due to pressure from everyone else, as yeah, Mexico is or was, or will be a huge Narco Insurgency. I don't see her as being particularly filled with fear. I mean she strikes me as a fearless type who will/would do whatever it takes.

Are people in power sociopaths?

Well they are certainly above the law in some regards in terms to what other people are subject to, so they escape the definitions that might be handed down to others.

Will they do whatever it takes, probably. War is an economic machine, and appeasing religious bloodlust must be an art to some degree. Sometimes I wonder if there are things to be discovered based on the way people use language and slang.

Where the police roam the streets and get involved with the community, it is historically called "The Beat".

When people in modern times collect their armies and arrange for planned and ethical war it is called "staging".

I wouldn't blast them away, but if I had to, I might try collecting all of the radicals in the country I control and imprisoning them, and risking public backlash and human right activists. Perhaps I might deport them. Most certainly I would place embargos on all products from the foreign nation and cease exports to.

However, I think for me to ever absolutely need to do that is if Allah rose from hell and possessed every single one of his devotees turning them into brain eating zombies.

Why dont we just kill all humans, there will be no more problems.

by Bobby Elvis

Are you of the mind that we are disordered, or that we are the next step in the evolutionary chain? Personally, I am blinded by what we could accomplish if TPTB weren't so concerned with civilian casualties and the 'little guy'. Granted that the people in power may be closer to us than the average joe, but they are still accountable to lobbyists, voters, etc. Their livelihood depends on pleasing the masses. But what if we had people in power who had no fear of doing what is necessary, imagine what we could get done.

For example; if there were a button that you could push that would blast every arab, muslim man, woman and child on the face of the earth into dust, would you do it to eliminate the threat? Without regard to the possibility that some of those people weren't terrorists and might not present a threat?

by Bobby Elvis

Your opinion is a bit short-sighted, don't you think? It doesn't matter if all Arab Muslims are evil. You get rid of them all, problem solved. Same thing with ants, or fleas. You kill them all and there is no more problem. I don't understand your problem with this way of thinking. In the end, might is right. The mightiest will survive, so what's the problem with ending the threat now or should we have more casualties on our side? If there is a threat, it must be eliminated, plain and simple. If that means genocide, then genocide it is.

Yes, they are extremists, but if we don't eliminate the threat completely then they will rear their ugly heads again at some point. Why not just eliminate the threat completely and not have to worry about it again, in the future. It's not racial, it's just common sense, as far as I can tell.

by Bobby Elvis

I'm sure it is partially fear, no one wants their head cut off with with a knife. Regardless of the motivation, why is it wrong to eliminate a threat that wants you dead? I repeat, it is NOT racism, it is simply a way to deal with a threat. If we had dealt with the threat in North Korea, during the conflict in the 50's, we wouldn't have to put up with their bullshit now. We wouldn't have the threat of thermonuclear war with them, they would be staunch allies. Would I have advocated genocide on the North Koreans? Probably not, but they aren't the threat to the world that Arab Muslims are. Am I prejudice against Arab Muslims? After what I've seen of what they are capable of, then yes, I am. They are a threat and should be eliminated.

 Threat, threat, threat... You sound like one of those brainwashed Americans taught to think that war is safety, who pisses on himself every time an arab passes by. It's fear that makes you think an overreaction like genocide would be a good solution. It's because you're afraid of the "threat". Psychopaths aren't the anxious, fearful kind of fellows, are they?

Also, it's more likely that a car will kill you than a terrorist. Logically that's a bigger threat to you. What, forbid cars now? Arabs aren't even the most important global threat at the moment. Look in other parts of Asia.

I'm sure it is partially fear, no one wants their head cut off with with a knife. Regardless of the motivation, why is it wrong to eliminate a threat that wants you dead? I repeat, it is NOT racism, it is simply a way to deal with a threat. If we had dealt with the threat in North Korea, during the conflict in the 50's, we wouldn't have to put up with their bullshit now. We wouldn't have the threat of thermonuclear war with them, they would be staunch allies. Would I have advocated genocide on the North Koreans? Probably not, but they aren't the threat to the world that Arab Muslims are. Am I prejudice against Arab Muslims? After what I've seen of what they are capable of, then yes, I am. They are a threat and should be eliminated.

North Korea, is probably South Korea, China, and Japans problem seeing as they such long history with each other.

Creating a nuclear weapon requires uranium, and that's not such a big deal if someone wants to sell it to them. I do have to wonder what it takes for someone to sell them an intercontinental ballistic missile silo system.

Same goes for the Arabs in many instances.

How or why would North Korea launch an attack against the USA?

Arabs, different story. Anyone who gives them the capacity to build nuclear weapons is surely going to be held responsible if a bomber ever made it's way into the USA with one on a plane, in a suitcase.

I wish I knew more about military culture, and why governments continue to push large amounts of resources, and raise people with the culture of war, however, I don't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription

Interesting map. I do wonder why the Ukraine abolished conscription in 2013.

Red is areas with conscription.

Blue is no enforced conscription.

Here is a descent map of Uranium mines. I have no idea if it is complete, but it seems it all comes from Canada.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining

 I don't know alot about Uranium, but the geology of that area in Canada to my understanding is an huge ancient impact crater.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carswell_crater

Carswell is an impact crater within the Athabasca Basin of the Canadian Shield in northern Saskatchewan, Canada.[1] It is 39 kilometres (24 mi) in diameter and the age is estimated to be 115 ± 10 million years (Lower Cretaceous). The crater is exposed at the surface.

The Cluff Lake uranium mine produced over 62 million pounds of yellowcake during its 22-year operating life.[2]

 

 

Oh shit, that's a dead??? mine in Saskatchewan, the map showing the world production of Uranium shows all the current uranium coming out of Canada in Ontario, Sudbury.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudbury_Basin

The Sudbury Basin, also known as Sudbury Structure or the Sudbury Nickel Irruptive, is a major geologic structure in Ontario, Canada. It is the second-largest known impact crater or astrobleme on Earth, as well as one of the oldest.[1]