"it shows in your refusal and use the reply option."
...wut?
I suppose I should be more specific when you're around Turncoat, cause you've always lacked the vision to see what someone actually means in terms of what they say.
What I'm saying is how he always replies generally instead of directly replying to a post he's actually responding to. Nothing wrong with that, but as an observation, it does say things about him, and in this case it exposes some degree of pride.
It just seems like it's not something that'd really show anything about him, it seems like such a minor thing to focus on.
I'd sooner figure laziness, apathy, or an aversion against changing older patterns as opposed to pride. Sure other things suggest pride, but what link he clicks to reply to people? It's a bit of an assumptive reach.
"cause you've always lacked the vision to see what someone actually means in terms of what they say."
Cute, your choice of language suggests you believe yourself to somehow possess more understanding than others here.
by TurncoatIt just seems like it's not something that'd really show anything about him, it seems like such a minor thing to focus on.
Regardless of how one measures it, every detail says something about us.
I'd sooner figure laziness, apathy, or an aversion against changing older patterns as opposed to pride. Sure other things suggest pride, but what link he clicks to reply to people? It's a bit of an assumptive reach.
You're talking as if this is all I used to make him out. While I was addressing him, I never felt the need to lay all my cards on the table to appease your inquisitive outlook on interactions that happen before you. Turncoat, I assure you this guy is very prideful, I'm sure even he knows that. Only thing is, he'd never fess us to his own misconducts or faulty attitude.
"cause you've always lacked the vision to see what someone actually means in terms of what they say."
Cute, your choice of language suggests you believe yourself to somehow possess more understanding than others here.
Yes. Just as you have greater understanding than you did 10 years ago, so you will again in another 10 years boy. Believe it.
"Regardless of how one measures it, every detail says something about us."
That's true, but I think you might be jumping the gun on using it as anything conclusive.
"You're talking as if this is all I used to make him out."
Not entirely, it just seemed like a weak argument. Why include it at all?
"While I was addressing him, I never felt the need to lay all my cards on the table to appease your inquisitive outlook on interactions that happen before you. Turncoat,"
You could at least play "cards" that make your arguments look half-believable.
I also doubt you're really gathering much data on this Mr. O character, no, this is likely another bluff like your Edvard chat bit that you never delivered. All you have are bluffs that only a few people at best might take seriously.
"I assure you this guy is very prideful, I'm sure even he knows that."
That isn't the point, even my post didn't deny that factor. The point is that your means of proving it are lackluster, reaches.
"Only thing is, he'd never fess us to his own misconducts or faulty attitude."
How... familiar~?
"Yes. Just as you have greater understanding than you did 10 years ago, so you will again in another 10 years boy."
Age does not denote wisdom, it simply denotes a higher likelihood of wisdom when compared to your own past self.
To drudge up an old name, whoameye is a good self-demonstrating example.
"Believe it."
Quoting Naruto? How strange.
by Turncoat"Regardless of how one measures it, every detail says something about us."
That's true, but I think you might be jumping the gun on using it as anything conclusive.
Obviously.
"You're talking as if this is all I used to make him out."
Not entirely, it just seemed like a weak argument. Why include it at all?
Yes entirely, cause to you it seems so. And you continue to go on about it. To me it isn't even a big deal, probably cause what I said wasn't for you.
"While I was addressing him, I never felt the need to lay all my cards on the table to appease your inquisitive outlook on interactions that happen before you. Turncoat,"
You could at least play "cards" that make your arguments look half-believable.
I'm not worried about convincing anyone of the obvious. Especially for those who point fingers and provide no input on their own arguments.
I also doubt you're really gathering much data on this Mr. O character, no, this is likely another bluff like your Edvard chat bit that you never delivered. All you have are bluffs that only a few people at best might take seriously.
When asked if I would ever post it, I replied, and I quote.... "Well I did have it for awhile now and I never made it a priority to do
it. I'd rather Ed just own up to it and not even that is important."
On that very page, regardless of your own belief, did you not preach a resolve without the need of public display though ? Now you change your mind. That Turncoat is very disingenuous behavior on your behalf.
Don't blame me for choosing, and between Ed and myself, we know the kind of things he does on here regardless of denial or what others think. I do have some degree of respect for Ed believe it of not. If I had his identity, I wouldn't out him. After all, how can I expect to value myself if I do things I look down on.
"I assure you this guy is very prideful, I'm sure even he knows that."
That isn't the point, even my post didn't deny that factor. The point is that your means of proving it are lackluster, reaches.
I was talking directly to Mr. OmegaPhi. There is no need for me to prove anything, though I do think my claim is proof enough. And let's not forget, it's in your character to intervene and ask many questions while the rest of us just carry on with what we're talking about, and why ? Cause things don't make sense in your clouded world, while the rest get it. Had you known better, we wouldn't have these moments of you trying to figure this out.
And remember, you are already proven to be, disingenuous by flop flopping your own suggestions.
"Only thing is, he'd never fess us to his own misconducts or faulty attitude."
How... familiar~?
Is that even worth carrying on with since there are no examples ? Sarcasm in this case is petty. You ought to know you can't get anywhere with that alone.
"Yes. Just as you have greater understanding than you did 10 years ago, so you will again in another 10 years boy."
Age does not denote wisdom, it simply denotes a higher likelihood of wisdom when compared to your own past self.
To drudge up an old name, whoameye is a good self-demonstrating example.
You'll have to excuse me, I don't really pay any mind to that member. Are you sure this member fails at obtaining any wisdom over time, or are you insulting this person ?
If you have a life, and experience various kinds of encounters and dramas, you will be wiser in 10 years guaranteed. Of course we can be wiser even tomorrow. Time moves forward, and wisdom comes over time. No and's if's or but's.
"Believe it."
Quoting Naruto? How strange.
Ironically I take your word about this being Naruto's motto. But damn, it's just a cliche phrase I found to be useful at the time. You lose points yet again.
And then he said, every step appears to be
The unavoidable consequence of the preceding one
And in the end there beckons more and more clearly
Total annihilation
This is the ending of the beginning
This is the beginning of the end
And when the water falls again
All is dead and nobody lives