Oh, sure. So I'm automatically part of some consumerist culture, a slave to media and propaganda? You think I sit around the telly all day eating pizza and fries? Think I'm years in debt from living beyond my means, paying down a car and college and a house? Think I don't know who really runs this country? Think again.
It would be like me saying you're a sheep to China's communist propaganda. How'd you even access this site from behind the firewall? Ignorance, you closed-minded fool.
Sounds reasonable regarding the Bermuda triangle. I'd like to see the publication that detected this antimatter signature. PhDs are research degrees -- you don't get them by taking courses. And I have mine already, so no need to 'massacre my fellow students,' whatever that's supposed to mean.
I'm not even going to touch on the quantum teleportation. You're surely just going to link to a news story in which China achieves teleportation.
But yes, I still think you're stupid.
by The PsychologistLol ambiguity? Maybe you have not found your intellectual match here but ambiguity does not mean making no sense then feeling so confident about it that you think you are right.
by MrOmegaPhiLol ambiguity? Maybe you have not found your intellectual match here but ambiguity does not mean making no sense then feeling so confident about it that you think you are right.
Oh I get it now... my confidence is akin to a giant penis dangling in front of your homophobic face.
It's true: people are terrified by intelligent people, but no one here appears to be afraid of you. This is largely because you're, well, not intelligent. You are therefore not a threat to anyone's pre-existing self concept. Even if by chance you do link us to a scientific source which supports one of the many. many points you continuously try to make here, it'll just prove you to be a frenetic internet jockey.
Sounds reasonable regarding the Bermuda triangle. I'd like to see the publication that detected this antimatter signature
Why it was a PHD in a lab coat with grant from the government to do research.
You are an aspie. Let that sink in.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/GLAST/news/fermi-thunderstorms.html
@helena - you're an institutionalized public sector service welfare case. Which means you are okay with me, just stop repeating everything the aspie says before I decide you are retarded as well.
Hey, you're getting better at this! That was a nice, reputable source you provided right there. By the way, I wasn't being sarcastic when I said that sounded like a reasonable explanation...I was just curious where you'd heard it as I'd never read about it before.
Not an aspie, sorry. Try harder.
Yeah, it's obvious... swiss are using laser tech to try and condense water droplets in the air.
Meanwhile the Chinese are seeding the clouds with silver and dry ice, both which increase electrical conductivity.
They also claim they can delay rain. So obviously they are doing something more significant than lasers.
Noctilucent clouds form 100 KM up in the atmosphere and they are seen in close proximity to the Aurora borealis. That's not alot of info and basically going off what's the wiki. Sure... it's according to many a "global warming" catastrophe.
The auroa produce enough electricity to form a chemical bonds between hydrogen and oxygen, most probably. I am sure somewhere in the world someone has mixed these two gases and introduced some energy. I don't need that proof to know however... there are no other options left, it is a matter of common sense and a process of elimination and some belief in significantly more wild theories about the formation of the Earth and it's evolution.
Just look up into the sky... that's significant enough...
Oh look, speak of the devil, someone has...
Everything just falls into place after a while...
If you want the theory that turns the whole world upside down on it's head, I can provide another revelation, but unfortunately I cannot as it seems you are incapable of anything that requires thought, and must rely on what you read in pop science mags.
That is your religion, and your choice.
Very interesting. I am not abject to what you say when you present it in an intelligible manner. I've no doubt that the auroras contain enough free energy to form water. And yes, people all over the world mix the two gases and introduce energy - that is often an introductory chemistry laboratory, or even a classroom demonstration.
In 1889 there was a massive solar storm called the Carrington Event - good thing to read about, if you're interested - and the auroras were so intense on earth that people in the Bahamas were waking up at 2 am, thinking it was dawn. Telegraph operators were being shocked before they figured out that if they disconnected from their power supplies, they could send messages through the charged atmosphere itself. So, I'm sure that at least some of these storms also produce antimatter as highly energetic particles collide with the atmosphere. These are all very active areas of research with many questions yet to be answered.
I am certainly capable of thought, and spend the vast majority of each day doing just that. All of the achievements you've mentioned are based off of research, which requires creativity, ideas, observations, experiments, a lot of traveling down the wrong path before you figure out the right one. Criticism of your ideas is a part of progress. You might find that, with some training, your creative ideas could be turned into actual theories with actual evidence. But you've got to be able to back them up and know when they contradict with experiment and observation. Right now most (though not all) of what I see you doing is as follows:
(1) Assert untested idea
(2) Be met with criticism on said idea
(3) Assert idea more loudly
(4) Be met with evidence against idea
(5) Resort to character attacks with vague assertions that you alone know the truth, but can't be bothered to back it up because no one would understand you.
Also, I don't read popular science mags. They're overly simplistic and often inaccurate.
I did. And those ten commandments were actually five observations of your MO in responding to posts.
I forgot the sixth: Make accusations that other's haven't read your posts. (Usually your last resort).
By the way, here's what you were talking about before:
www.osa-opn.org/home/articles/volume_21/issue_7/features/laser-based_weather_control/#.U27uzJwo4gU
Ultrafast lasers and their AMO (atomic, molecular, optical) applications are my area of specialty.
If you're planning to respond, actually highlighting some cool, unique phenomena as you did a few posts ago would be a good way to go. Peace out girl scout.