by Emily NghiemSorry i misunderstood. I still respect your realism. Yes we will always have "workers in training" like we will always have toddlers in preschool and teenagers in high school. That doesnt mean to abuse the dependent lower classes of social development. Look at our school system and academic tiers in class levels. Surely we can use the campus model to organize communities in campuses to provide and protect student interests and rights while they work their way thru school to become independent workers owners mgrs and leaders. Pace Universal already build schools to counteract poverty and trafficking. If one woman from India can do that, what can two or three women like me or Luna do by working in teams.
Revolutionary maybe, but not impossible. Its already being done and just needs to be replicated to reach more ppl. www.earnedamnesty.org
Thanks for the reminder of the thinking we are up against that doesnt see the change coming which is already taking root in modelprograms waiting to be replicated along the border and worldwide. Even one of the Tibetan monks was working with Chinese govt to set up more schools, and schools are getting built in other poor areas of Southeast Asia and Africa despite battles and plagues that obstruct these efforts. So everyone knows that education is the key to managing the worlds populations.
This is a quote from Emily in another thread. In it she discusses the idea of creating schools to offset poverty. I think this is a great solution to a big problem, so I'd like to treat to give this idea it's own thread, and discuss it in greater detail.
Emily, I can understand how educating a population can create opportunity, but in places like Africa where resources are scarce, will education ever be enough? I don't think it's a realistic solution when we consider poverty stricken locations that are a result of a lack of abundance, or an oppressive government.
Any thoughts on this?
Luna