yes.
The word itself is a loose definition, but within BDSM it's defined strongly enough. It's when bits branch from that definition that new terms come to be.
As for "the dream for many"... only if they like a challenge. Some buckle when confronted or challenged, and that's no fun at all for me. Being the "slave" brand of submissive I say ought to be earned, not assumed from the start.
Is it really domination if both desire the same outcome?
The outcome being you recreating your sexual experiences in childhood. I would say it was your odd uncle that came out as the dominant one. Dominatrix or slave it doesn't matter. The lot of you can't experience fucking without recreating the scenario of uncle fiddles tormenting you in the closet while your family plays cards.
well, yes, depending on the scenario, no? if one wants to dominate the other and the other wants to be dominated then they both desire the same outcome and it is still domination, no?
i don't get what you're asking...
or are you bringing up the thing about if it's expected of you to be a sub but you're manipulating the dom, who's really the dom? is that what you're asking?
how is the bdsm branch define it? :)
A group of sexually repressed retards who replace their sexual urges with sexual abuse. A culture who celebrates being conditioned to be weirdos that wear ridiculous costumes, act dramatic, and think they are unique and unbridled when clearly the opposite is the truth.
or: uncle fiddles army
Is that what happen to you poor thing?
Sounds good to me. Maybe if I tell you I sucked my uncles cock while riding my mum's dildo I can relate to you better. Then I can replace the 'socio' in your life and you can fill these pages with your indecision/attention seeking behaviour and our backstory as the lead in. What do you think?