1. The few times I really wanted to leave the planet, I found other ways to protest.
one time I ran an ad declaring a hunger strike against my family to force steps toward resolution of past garbage that wasn't getting fixed by refusing to talk.
I threatened to post a website with demands to prevent a hunger strike if the political BS in my community/district didn't stop, regarding ongoing abuse of funding to destroy a national historic site that should have been preserved instead.
My friends protested so badly to that idea, we put it on hold, and I am still looking for other ways to resolve this huge FU mess where I come out alive and healthy.
but the idea of faking a hunger strike as some reality/art protest, selling advance tickets online to my funeral to raise funds for historic preservation, still sounds tempting to me, while my friends worry I might actually try pulling a crazy stunt.
2. as for fantasies of killing other ppl?
the closest I've come to this is imagining as a joke what would happen if I tried to take up serial killing just to see how long it would take to figure out I was doing it. And if anyone would believe it or not, and how they would explain it.
Almost like a joke on people that Emily could be the serial killer you least expected just to freak people out. yes honestly I have thought of that before.
Because I am so big on not doing anything against consent, no bullying no forcing ppl to change their minds or thinking or how they are, right or wrong, but believe everything should be decided by agreement by free choice and free information.
I even believe in people's rights to believe in killing themselves or other people provided that all the people are freely consenting to this, and aren't limited by things that could change, such as healing their pain or cancer that makes them want to die. If you limit or block the choices, that's not what I call free choice.
if all the other factors are resolved and they still want to die or be killed, then if people agree to be killed, why not. I think most of the desire is a rebellion against not having control; so if you give people free choice that would remove most of the unnatural desire in most cases. I think it's a problem when it's against free will or fully informed choice, or people illicitly cover it up or other motives etc. If it is freely their belief, I have no problem including that choice, as long as people are completely open to prevent any possible risk of abusing that freedom. For the death penalty to be carried out by the state, I believe this should require consensus and complete check on the entire process to prevent abuses. by the time we manage such a freely informed consensus, there wouldn't be any killing.