3
posts
Interesting how it's all about bragging about how they uncovered and restored the manuscript, but still don't actually reveal the author's way of thinking (which they mention in various and mysterious ways throughout the documentary, barely implying it is the method of exhaustion).
The title should have stated instead:
How Archimede's Palimpsest was uncovered.
I suggest reading "The Archimedes Codex: Revealing the Secrets of the World's Greatest Palimpsest" by Reviel Netz and William Noel instead.
3
posts