Inq helped me add DNSSEC to the site yesterday
I haven't seen him around for a while. Anyway, you laid out the conditions and we more or less accept them as long as we use this site. I would do the same. Nevertheless, I do see Edvard's point.
Are others free to do anything, as long as it is not illegal and not related to the Primal-Sturm case?
Inq helped me add DNSSEC to the site yesterday
I haven't seen him around for a while. Anyway, you laid out the conditions and we more or less accept them as long as we use this site. I would do the same. Nevertheless, I do see Edvard's point.
Are others free to do anything, as long as it is not illegal and not related to the Primal-Sturm case?
Yes
Inq helped me add DNSSEC to the site yesterday
I haven't seen him around for a while. Anyway, you laid out the conditions and we more or less accept them as long as we use this site. I would do the same. Nevertheless, I do see Edvard's point.
Are others free to do anything, as long as it is not illegal and not related to the Primal-Sturm case?
Yes
Bullshit. I think it is very safe to assume that ANYONE who poses a "threat", real or imaginary (as I suspect it is this case), to your friend will get the same treatment as Primal.
Inq helped me add DNSSEC to the site yesterday
I haven't seen him around for a while. Anyway, you laid out the conditions and we more or less accept them as long as we use this site. I would do the same. Nevertheless, I do see Edvard's point.
Are others free to do anything, as long as it is not illegal and not related to the Primal-Sturm case?
Yes
Bullshit. I think it is very safe to assume that ANYONE who poses a "threat", real or imaginary (as I suspect it is this case), to your friend will get the same treatment as Primal.
No
Inq helped me add DNSSEC to the site yesterday
I haven't seen him around for a while. Anyway, you laid out the conditions and we more or less accept them as long as we use this site. I would do the same. Nevertheless, I do see Edvard's point.
Are others free to do anything, as long as it is not illegal and not related to the Primal-Sturm case?
Yes
Bullshit. I think it is very safe to assume that ANYONE who poses a "threat", real or imaginary (as I suspect it is this case), to your friend will get the same treatment as Primal.
No
I know you very well, since Chet had you pussywhipped. You are an idiot and a tool, and you give no crap about SC values.
Inq helped me add DNSSEC to the site yesterday
I haven't seen him around for a while. Anyway, you laid out the conditions and we more or less accept them as long as we use this site. I would do the same. Nevertheless, I do see Edvard's point.
Are others free to do anything, as long as it is not illegal and not related to the Primal-Sturm case?
Yes
Bullshit. I think it is very safe to assume that ANYONE who poses a "threat", real or imaginary (as I suspect it is this case), to your friend will get the same treatment as Primal.
No
I know you very well, since Chet had you pussywhipped. You are an idiot and a tool, and you give no crap about SC values.
I am not the one being used by a crazy schizophrenic. You are an idiot and a tool and you dont give a crap about any values, but your own, you will set aside SC values, promises, friendships, anything, just to get your way. You are everything you hate.
I am not the one being used by a crazy schizophrenic. You are an idiot and a tool and you dont give a crap about any values, but your own, you will set aside SC values, promises, friendships, anything, just to get your way. You are everything you hate.
Unlike you, I am my own master. Now be a good boy and back off, I am sure you've earned your biscuit from Sturm for today XD
Good said:I am not the one being used by a crazy schizophrenic. You are an idiot and a tool and you dont give a crap about any values, but your own, you will set aside SC values, promises, friendships, anything, just to get your way. You are everything you hate.
Unlike you, I am my own master. Now be a good boy and back off, I am sure you've earned your biscuit from Sturm for today XD
So you agree that you only care for your own values. Acceptance is the first step to a better tomorrow.
Is Primal feeding you biscuits?
1) You're literally screaming to have a bark-raving mad, mentally sick person on this forum despite that it feeds her delusions and makes her even more insane. You admitted yourself that she is fucking bonkers but you don't care. And, the only reason I can come up with is that it's because she wings for you when needed.
This by itself is not a reason to keep her away. There's a lot of "sick" people here that we don't just allow, but embrace having around.
2) This nutfuck's ban was the sole condition TFI had before he agreed to salvage SC for us. You try to equate this sole ban of one person, who tried to fuck with someone legally, with luna's random bans of anyone who challenged or disagreed with her too much (which you were careful not to do even when she was wrong).
It is hypocritical of Ed, but maybe him no longer resembling Luna's Bootlicker is a part of his fresh start.
3) TFI let everyone know this was his condition before he agreed to do the work (and pay the $) to relaunch the forum. If this bothers you as much as you say, then you should find someone to build a new forum and...offer to pay for it? Stop trying to make TFI change his stance (cos he won't) and propose a new solution and see if people care enough.
Yeah I remember when people were saying this a month or two ago...
