Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
4 posts
0 votes

Twitter bans Danielle Stella for treason tweet


Posts: 894

“If it is proven @IlhanMN passed sensitive info to Iran, she should be tried for #treason and hanged,"

twitter bans for opinions and restating the penalty for being found guilty of treason.

hahahahaaa

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ilhan-omar-challenger-suspended-from-twitter-after-tweeting-omar-could-be-hanged-for-treason

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/ilhan-omar-s-opponent-banned-twitter-after-suggesting-congresswoman-should-n1093626

 

 

Posts: 33586
0 votes RE: Twitter bans Danielle S...

Popularized social media is owned by The Left nowadays, and anything trying to be a Right wing version of them just reads like an imitation. 

Now that websites can be sued as if they were companies (if not suing their host provider for the little people) it seems to be going more steadily towards the direction of Cable Censorship, except over arguably more complicated subjects. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 894
0 votes RE: Twitter bans Danielle S...

Popularized social media is owned by The Left nowadays, and anything trying to be a Right wing version of them just reads like an imitation. 

Now that websites can be sued as if they were companies (if not suing their host provider for the little people) it seems to be going more steadily towards the direction of Cable Censorship, except over arguably more complicated subjects. 

right, these private companies like twitter/facebook w/e can ban people just because they have different opinions silencing free speech.

when private companies start moving into the realm of public communications forums, giving equal opportinity free speech seems like a right not a privilege.

 

Posts: 33586
0 votes RE: Twitter bans Danielle S...
Billy said: 

Popularized social media is owned by The Left nowadays, and anything trying to be a Right wing version of them just reads like an imitation. 

Now that websites can be sued as if they were companies (if not suing their host provider for the little people) it seems to be going more steadily towards the direction of Cable Censorship, except over arguably more complicated subjects. 

right, these private companies like twitter/facebook w/e can ban people just because they have different opinions silencing free speech.

Kinda

They need to be able to flag it under some sort of criteria first to justify it towards their audience. 

when private companies start moving into the realm of public communications forums, giving equal opportinity free speech seems like a right not a privilege.

This is why we need to fight when companies try to turn the internet into a cable package. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
4 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.