Sociopath Community

Everyone generally agrees with my assessment of everyone else but themselves.

butteredToas said:

Why would you guess for yourself?

So that they can't know what I'm thinking.

Buttered Toast said:

Trump's tweets/X posts have been all about "Comrade" Harris and about the border.  It is interesting how she laughed when he called her and her parents Marxists.  What do we think about that?

About her and her parents being Marxist or her laughing? The laughing was a heavily rehearsed response on her part.

I would've liked to see the debate without this mic muting thing, but in that case Kamala would've totally wrecked trump. It was smart of the Trump campaign to go with the Biden debate rules. Allowing Kamala the kawaii lawyer to prosecute Trump would've been a total smackdown, probably worse than that Axios interview. Trump has no inkling of how logical discourse works. He's in his element when he gets to ramble and speed past any questions over the credibility of his exaggeratex claims. When someone questions him, his showmanship, which is charismatic in speeches, then looks like he's a dumbass trying to explain to the American people how immigrants come from cultures where eating pets is the norm.

I certainly think Kamala is good at prosecuting, but I'd still say it's less clear how good she is at answering questions. She's very good at avoiding questions, because as a lawyer it's best to stfu if you don't know what you're talking about.

I can't wait to see how the campaigning changes, along with the slogans and issues they present.  Stewart was right: going back to the default of "avoiding the question" is kind of funny, but familiar.

Hmh

Buttered Toast said: 

Trump's tweets/X posts have been all about "Comrade" Harris and about the border.  It is interesting how she laughed when he called her and her parents Marxists.  What do we think about that?

 

I can't wait to see how the campaigning changes, along with the slogans and issues they present.  Stewart was right: going back to the default of "avoiding the question" is kind of funny, but familiar.

It’s true that her parents were Marxist.

But that in itself is a useless attack, because her positions aren't very Marxist aside from free healthcare for illegals. And like I said before, the debate format doesn’t offer room for extrapolation, so she must just laugh.

I don’t think the campaigns will be changing very much at all. Democrats are going to push abortion, and that Trump is an unhinged maniac. Republicans are going to push migration and the weaknesses of the Biden administration. They’ve been running these playbooks for a while now, because those issues are what are going to activate their voter bases.

Who else thinks the debate format sucks?

We should have a gladiator arena with a big biased audience that cheers every time one side says anything, no matter how brainless it is. And we should have interruptions. We'd have this surreal situation where Kamala is tearing Trump down on every front but is booed by the audience every time she speaks. And then Fox declares Trump winner and the CNN declares Kamala winner and the masses vote anyway based on whichever football team they're rooting for.

Just a small reminder that Kamala still hasn't done anything as VP.

Jada said: 

Who else thinks the debate format sucks?

We should have a gladiator arena with a big biased audience that cheers every time one side says anything, no matter how brainless it is. And we should have interruptions. We'd have this surreal situation where Kamala is tearing Trump down on every front but is booed by the audience every time she speaks. And then Fox declares Trump winner and the CNN declares Kamala winner and the masses vote anyway based on whichever football team they're rooting for.

 Those who favor Kamala will say she won the debate. Some right wingers will also Say Kamala won. Then there's people like me who'll suggest the debate was rigged in favor of Kamala. Trump was also debating and being fact checked by the hosts while debating Kamala so it was a 3 on 1 debate. Now there's this whole ABC whistleblower thing going on, and we'll find out how credible it is in time. Probably is. ABC is Trump's enemy and has been working overtime trying to destroy him for 8 years now. 

Spatial Mind said: 

 Those who favor Kamala will say she won the debate. Some right wingers will also Say Kamala won. Then there's people like me who'll suggest the debate was rigged in favor of Kamala. Trump was also debating and being fact checked by the hosts while debating Kamala so it was a 3 on 1 debate. Now there's this whole ABC whistleblower thing going on, and we'll find out how credible it is in time. Probably is. ABC is Trump's enemy and has been working overtime trying to destroy him for 8 years now.

I thought you might say that.

Who are the whistleblowers? The debate was rigged. It's not even a question. I think the question is more how rigged it was.

There's no doubt whatsoever that the ABC news was favoring Kamala when fact checking. They would say that Trump was simply lying more than Kamala, but whether or not that's true is beside the point. The point is that Kamala the kawaii lawyer should've done the fact checking in a fair debate, not a third party.

As for how rigged was the debate on a scale from 1 to 10, I would say, 4. It could've been worse. However, should evidence demonstrate that ABC leaked their questions to Kamala ahead of time, then I'd place it at 8.

My suspicion, however, is that the Trump campaign is guessing that ABC leaked the quesrions to Kamala and spread false rumors to see if they can expose true conspiracies. I reckon it will not stick.

At the end of the day, I think even without ABC, it was no doubt Kamala's lawyering experience that gave her the razor sharp edge and won her the debate. But it won't matter, because even despite the performance, voters don't know anything about Kamala, so in the end the debate serves to wake up voters to the fact that Kamala doesn't have any policies. So it'll be Donald's win. According to the polls, the debate had little effect on the popularity of either candidate.

Spatial Mind said: 

Jada said: 

Who else thinks the debate format sucks?

We should have a gladiator arena with a big biased audience that cheers every time one side says anything, no matter how brainless it is. And we should have interruptions. We'd have this surreal situation where Kamala is tearing Trump down on every front but is booed by the audience every time she speaks. And then Fox declares Trump winner and the CNN declares Kamala winner and the masses vote anyway based on whichever football team they're rooting for.

 Those who favor Kamala will say she won the debate. Some right wingers will also Say Kamala won. Then there's people like me who'll suggest the debate was rigged in favor of Kamala. Trump was also debating and being fact checked by the hosts while debating Kamala so it was a 3 on 1 debate. Now there's this whole ABC whistleblower thing going on, and we'll find out how credible it is in time. Probably is. ABC is Trump's enemy and has been working overtime trying to destroy him for 8 years now. 

 

They were “fact-checking” him only. But honestly I was surprised how much they put the mic on when he was speaking out of turn. 

A lot of animals in nature will eat their offspring to deny resources to their competitors. Humans are no different. People that are against abortion are simply promoting exploitation, it's why they appeal to emotion so much instead of the obvious fact that the child will be born just to be exploited by capitalistic ownership.

Tryptamine said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Jada said: 

Who else thinks the debate format sucks?

We should have a gladiator arena with a big biased audience that cheers every time one side says anything, no matter how brainless it is. And we should have interruptions. We'd have this surreal situation where Kamala is tearing Trump down on every front but is booed by the audience every time she speaks. And then Fox declares Trump winner and the CNN declares Kamala winner and the masses vote anyway based on whichever football team they're rooting for.

 Those who favor Kamala will say she won the debate. Some right wingers will also Say Kamala won. Then there's people like me who'll suggest the debate was rigged in favor of Kamala. Trump was also debating and being fact checked by the hosts while debating Kamala so it was a 3 on 1 debate. Now there's this whole ABC whistleblower thing going on, and we'll find out how credible it is in time. Probably is. ABC is Trump's enemy and has been working overtime trying to destroy him for 8 years now. 

 

They were “fact-checking” him only. But honestly I was surprised how much they put the mic on when he was speaking out of turn. 

 The whole mic thing is a rule invented just for Trump. If they enforced it and muted Trump it would only hurt them cause Trump is the one bringing in the ratings. They also probably want to say how Trump was speaking out of turn and use his drive against him. 

Harris wants another debate the same way a fighter who lost a fight wants a rematch. She never really answers questions either. She'll dance around and talking about how we need to come together and all that great sounding kumbia stuff then gets an applause.  

2015 RNC debates are solid gold. 

.

.

.

Onto other things. There was a possible chemical attack at a Trump rally earlier this week. I can post a lengthy report but here's some short. 

ALL HAIL THE KING