Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
9 / 19 posts
Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Turncoat is selling out...



How it appears to me is that you don't care about SC values until they turn against you in particular, as if you are arguing in favor of freedom purely you would not be defending Meta's decisions against Edvard and Primal from that being censorship.

Cawk actually encourages the ban and censorship of Primal, and myself, when I quote Primal. He lost all right to say anything about SC values, shooting himself in the foot, LMAO.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: Turncoat is selling out...
Edvard said: 



How it appears to me is that you don't care about SC values until they turn against you in particular, as if you are arguing in favor of freedom purely you would not be defending Meta's decisions against Edvard and Primal from that being censorship.

Cawk actually encourages the ban and censorship of Primal, and myself, when I quote Primal. He lost all right to say anything about SC values, shooting himself in the foot, LMAO.

 I only give a shit about SC values when it's about me, like when Turncoat deletes my threads.

On S-C, you destroyed the puppeting aspect, gaslighted mods to play in your favor/take your e-enemies out (ban on sights, killing puppetting game, etc.)

You're in no position to judge me, or anyone else here. You harmed S-C the most here, you were tested and you responded wrong to the S-C spam question.

---

Funny how Turncoat claims I can't cause any damage without Jim, when I was the reason he'd take the bus to the nearest internet cafe when his damaged router won't connect to the internet and set his alarm clock to 30 minutes intervals to wake up to and clean up spam I had posted on S-C.

last edit on 5/25/2019 1:18:35 AM
Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Turncoat is selling out...
Cawk said: 
Edvard said: 



How it appears to me is that you don't care about SC values until they turn against you in particular, as if you are arguing in favor of freedom purely you would not be defending Meta's decisions against Edvard and Primal from that being censorship.

Cawk actually encourages the ban and censorship of Primal, and myself, when I quote Primal. He lost all right to say anything about SC values, shooting himself in the foot, LMAO.

 I only give a shit about SC values when it's about me

The only way to assure your rights are respected is if others give a shit about SC values when it's about everyone. You will not get (positive) special treatment here.

 

On S-C, you destroyed the puppeting aspect, gaslighted mods to play in your favor/take your e-enemies out (ban on sights, killing puppetting game, etc.)

I destroyed nothing. They were just your puppets getting banned, and if others got into the crossfire, they got unbanned at a simple request.

The biggest enemies to a right or liberty are the ones ABUSING said right or liberty. It is because of a few, that the SC captchas and shit was put in place. Because of a few, that everyone has to go through airport security and shit.

Without the abuse, the reactionary measures would not be there. Don't tell me the destroyers are the ones putting up the defenses, bro. It was Neg, Jim, you, who impaired the functioning of SC for new accounts.

However, most new accounts or users got rep on request, so it was mostly you guys who suffered.

 

You harmed S-C the most here, you were tested and you responded wrong to the S-C spam question.

Dexter, Sinister, Wilful even put the spam question way before you, and the answer was already given: mute function, post deletions, post compression, bans. You've done nothing new, and nor did I or Turncoat in your case.

 

Funny how Turncoat claims I can't cause any damage without Jim,

By damage you mean posting annoying spam everywhere? Because we ca all see you can damage the first page alright. A monkey could do it too, and there's nothing impressive or admirable about it.

 

when I was the reason he'd take the bus to the nearest internet cafe when his damaged router won't connect to the internet and set his alarm clock to 30 minutes intervals to wake up to and clean up spam I had posted on S-C.

 LMAO, I did not know he was doing this. It partially explains his meltdown after Luna gave him the boot and took my side in everything.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
last edit on 5/25/2019 6:04:08 PM
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: Turncoat is selling out...
Edvard said: 
Cawk said: 
Edvard said: 



How it appears to me is that you don't care about SC values until they turn against you in particular, as if you are arguing in favor of freedom purely you would not be defending Meta's decisions against Edvard and Primal from that being censorship.

Cawk actually encourages the ban and censorship of Primal, and myself, when I quote Primal. He lost all right to say anything about SC values, shooting himself in the foot, LMAO.

 I only give a shit about SC values when it's about me

The only way to assure your rights are respected is if others give a shit about SC values when it's about everyone. You will not get (positive) special treatment here.

You literally did the same to me on S-C, made up imaginary rules and justified banning me and others on sight. This alone took away all of your SC value credibility. Why try to teach me about something you yourself didn't follow?

I'm aware this thread was an offense to SC values, I just played dirty like you did on S-C.

Turncoat may be right saying you can't find Primal sympathizers, but not for the reason he thinks. It's just nobody likes Primal to hop on your bandwagon, while CP was illegal/caused flashbacks in members/made them paranoid, etc. hence the easy bandwagon you had back then.

I remember Primal encouraged Luna to continue banning people for calling her the Whore of Babylon and what-not back in the day. Who but you would wanna sacrifice the site for her after all that, anyway?

On S-C, you destroyed the puppeting aspect, gaslighted mods to play in your favor/take your e-enemies out (ban on sights, killing puppetting game, etc.)

However, most new accounts or users got rep on request, so it was mostly you guys who suffered.

Yes, but it killed the puppet game for members i.e. less freedom (essential to SC) and no new users stayed with those impairments, you shot yourself in the foot. Mods still deleted links with (dot)s in them in the end.

Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Turncoat is selling out...
Cawk said:

 I only give a shit about SC values when it's about me, like when Turncoat deletes my threads.

How is this going for you?

You harmed S-C the most here, you were tested and you responded wrong to the S-C spam question.

 I think you keep asking the wrong S-C spam question, buddy.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
Posts: 5402
0 votes RE: Turncoat is selling out...

Cawk you failed to impact old SC with spamming and spamming CP, what makes you think you have any power here 

Posts: 5402
0 votes RE: Turncoat is selling out...
Cawk said: 

Funny how Turncoat claims I can't cause any damage without Jim, when I was the reason he'd take the bus to the nearest internet cafe when his damaged router won't connect to the internet and set his alarm clock to 30 minutes intervals to wake up to and clean up spam I had posted on S-C.

 Ah.... So that's why you're so upset at people not validating your efforts. 

I literally called it. 

Posts: 33529
0 votes RE: Turncoat is selling out...
Xadem said: 

Cawk you failed to impact old SC with spamming and spamming CP, what makes you think you have any power here 

He's impacting this forum, he has an entire hater list now that from the looks of things today is longer than the names I've recorded. 

He was seen as a non-issue, but now everyone's climbing out of the woodworks towards a convenience bandwagon of opportunity. This doesn't negate it's necessity, but maybe some things could have been discussed sooner. 

Xadem said: 
Cawk said: 

Funny how Turncoat claims I can't cause any damage without Jim, when I was the reason he'd take the bus to the nearest internet cafe when his damaged router won't connect to the internet and set his alarm clock to 30 minutes intervals to wake up to and clean up spam I had posted on S-C.

 Ah.... So that's why you're so upset at people not validating your efforts. 

I literally called it. 

He acts like my doing that was because of him, too, when it was actually Sinister that made for that conversion. 

He did prove me wrong though, he's doing damages right now and Jim's not here. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 7/24/2019 11:19:19 AM
Posts: 5402
0 votes RE: Turncoat is selling out...
Xadem said: 

Cawk you failed to impact old SC with spamming and spamming CP, what makes you think you have any power here 

He's impacting this forum, he has an entire hater list now that from the looks of things today is longer than the names I've recorded. 

He was seen as a non-issue, but now everyone's climbing out of the woodworks towards a convenience bandwagon of opportunity. This doesn't negate it's necessity, but maybe some things could have been discussed sooner. 

Yeah alright, I was trying to trigger him tbh. 

Xadem said: 
Cawk said: 

Funny how Turncoat claims I can't cause any damage without Jim, when I was the reason he'd take the bus to the nearest internet cafe when his damaged router won't connect to the internet and set his alarm clock to 30 minutes intervals to wake up to and clean up spam I had posted on S-C.

 Ah.... So that's why you're so upset at people not validating your efforts. 

I literally called it. 

He acts like my doing that was because of him, too, when it was actually Sinister that made for that conversion. 

He did prove me wrong though, he's doing damages right now and Jim's not here. 

 Our lil Cawky is growing up so fast

9 / 19 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.