Sociopath Community

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Billy said: 

anyone have the original SC Alignment Chart to see how BR's perception has changed?

 There is a possibility that at least SOMEBODY saved it.

 Did you not save it?

Honey said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Billy said: 

anyone have the original SC Alignment Chart to see how BR's perception has changed?

 There is a possibility that at least SOMEBODY saved it.

 Did you not save it?

 I lost the phone it was on.

Girl Meat said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

As for Lena- TC told me she's doxxed several people close to her before and others have confirmed.

 Oooh, spill names

Yeah, I'm curious too.

I mean, the rationale for your choices is solid enough br, just not necessarily the rationale I would have gone with.  Mostly however I at least don't disagree, but I'm not sure some members are in their best suited alignment slots. For myself I wouldn't have chosen impure, tho tbh none of the others necessarily suit me better. 

Interesting where you chose to put waltz...

All in all another quality content addition from br.

scarlett95 said: 

I mean, the rationale for your choices is solid enough br, just not necessarily the rationale I would have gone with.  Mostly however I at least don't disagree, but I'm not sure some members are in their best suited alignment slots. For myself I wouldn't have chosen impure, tho tbh none of the others necessarily suit me better. 

Interesting where you chose to put waltz...

All in all another quality content addition from br.

 The Waltz/Delora thing may or may not have been a goof... It all depends on who is right about the other. If she is right about him the alignments switch.

As I run out of people and slots it does get trickier to put everyone in the right place. Notice I also put myself in Impure though... Mainly due to my tendency to make fun of people and rage.

I like my alignment c:

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lawful Neutral- Turncoat.
Turncoat is SC's Hannibal Lector minus the cannibalism. A former psychology major, he will pick you apart to the bones, troll you, constructively criticize you, and look nice and tidy while doing it.

So... Hannibal'd be a pretty neutral, alright guy if he wasn't aiming to eat people? 

I can't help but wonder how many people on this chart might be more relatively placed instead of specifically so. 

I am much more true neutral, but in SC standards I may as well be where BO placed me.

I dunno man, you dance pretty well within Lawful circles while questioning chaos as if it were "inefficient", even towards successful displays of said chaos. 

Chaos is inefficient to complete an objective.

But it's fun and riskier, it could be objectively faster if you win at the risk.
And when you factor in fun in the equation it becomes viable.

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lawful Neutral- Turncoat.
Turncoat is SC's Hannibal Lector minus the cannibalism. A former psychology major, he will pick you apart to the bones, troll you, constructively criticize you, and look nice and tidy while doing it.

So... Hannibal'd be a pretty neutral, alright guy if he wasn't aiming to eat people? 

I can't help but wonder how many people on this chart might be more relatively placed instead of specifically so. 

I am much more true neutral, but in SC standards I may as well be where BO placed me.

I dunno man, you dance pretty well within Lawful circles while questioning chaos as if it were "inefficient", even towards successful displays of said chaos. 

Chaos is inefficient to complete an objective.

But it's fun and riskier, it could be objectively faster if you win at the risk.
And when you factor in fun in the equation it becomes viable.

What makes your idea of chaos inefficient? 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lawful Neutral- Turncoat.
Turncoat is SC's Hannibal Lector minus the cannibalism. A former psychology major, he will pick you apart to the bones, troll you, constructively criticize you, and look nice and tidy while doing it.

So... Hannibal'd be a pretty neutral, alright guy if he wasn't aiming to eat people? 

I can't help but wonder how many people on this chart might be more relatively placed instead of specifically so. 

I am much more true neutral, but in SC standards I may as well be where BO placed me.

I dunno man, you dance pretty well within Lawful circles while questioning chaos as if it were "inefficient", even towards successful displays of said chaos. 

Chaos is inefficient to complete an objective.

But it's fun and riskier, it could be objectively faster if you win at the risk.
And when you factor in fun in the equation it becomes viable.

What makes your idea of chaos inefficient?

It has no method, it is random.

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lawful Neutral- Turncoat.
Turncoat is SC's Hannibal Lector minus the cannibalism. A former psychology major, he will pick you apart to the bones, troll you, constructively criticize you, and look nice and tidy while doing it.

So... Hannibal'd be a pretty neutral, alright guy if he wasn't aiming to eat people? 

I can't help but wonder how many people on this chart might be more relatively placed instead of specifically so. 

I am much more true neutral, but in SC standards I may as well be where BO placed me.

I dunno man, you dance pretty well within Lawful circles while questioning chaos as if it were "inefficient", even towards successful displays of said chaos. 

Chaos is inefficient to complete an objective.

But it's fun and riskier, it could be objectively faster if you win at the risk.
And when you factor in fun in the equation it becomes viable.

What makes your idea of chaos inefficient?

It has no method, it is random.

I tend to see chaos as how to refine towards something efficient later.