Sociopath Community

I'd give you a  "gentlemanly" C+.

Your posts quite often give the illusion of substance but are absent any real conclusion. There is nothing revolutionary or insightful here to reward us for staying the course. However there is no issue with the technical aspect of your writing.

Incidentally Bush Sr. is reputed to have gotten "gentlemanly" C's at Yale.

bleary said: 

I'd give you a  "gentlemanly" C+.

Your posts quite often give the illusion of substance but are absent any real conclusion. There is nothing revolutionary or insightful here to reward us for staying the course. However there is no issue with the technical aspect of your writing.

Incidentally Bush Sr. is reputed to have gotten "gentlemanly" C's at Yale.

 The conclusion would be more of a call to action to men to quit rewarding women with little to no worth besides their looks for merely existing, and start seeking women of higher quality this fixing the issue and improving society via natural selection. Also, for these low quality women to realize the truth about themselves and focus on merit, not superficial likes for superficial looks 

You always pick prompts for yourself that never challenge the things you already believe, like you're popping a pimple of ideas instead of exploring bigger ones. It's like you're releasing what's in your head instead of acquiring more for it. 

For example, this prompt being given to a MGTOW: "In what ways would you say the modern male is overly entitled?"

It's easy to externalize the blames of your own shortcomings onto those around you, but it's harder to see your own partaking and enabling of it. I for instance can go at length about what both genders are doing wrong, both interrelationally and separate from each other, but I feel like you'd only be exploring that for objects of your desire that present obstacles you don't wish to climb. 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Despite her mostly meritless and worthless existence, she will still be showered with followers and likes and compliments and it will give her all the narcissistic supply she needs to feel like her massive ego is justified when in fact it isn't.

In many ways, a woman's merit is based on her appearance, and the social value they have is often proportionate to their attractiveness.

Tryptamine said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Despite her mostly meritless and worthless existence, she will still be showered with followers and likes and compliments and it will give her all the narcissistic supply she needs to feel like her massive ego is justified when in fact it isn't.

In many ways, a woman's merit is based on her appearance, and the social value they have is often proportionate to their attractiveness.

 For me merit is based on effort. This is BR, I forgot Delora was logged on.

Tropical Delora said: 

Tryptamine said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Despite her mostly meritless and worthless existence, she will still be showered with followers and likes and compliments and it will give her all the narcissistic supply she needs to feel like her massive ego is justified when in fact it isn't.

In many ways, a woman's merit is based on her appearance, and the social value they have is often proportionate to their attractiveness.

 For me merit is based on effort. This is BR, I forgot Delora was logged on.

In what ways would you argue that males are entitled? 

Turncoat said: 

Tropical Delora said: 

Tryptamine said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Despite her mostly meritless and worthless existence, she will still be showered with followers and likes and compliments and it will give her all the narcissistic supply she needs to feel like her massive ego is justified when in fact it isn't.

In many ways, a woman's merit is based on her appearance, and the social value they have is often proportionate to their attractiveness.

 For me merit is based on effort. This is BR, I forgot Delora was logged on.

In what ways would you argue that males are entitled? 

 I wouldn't say that our society encourages male entitlement so much. The typical view is that men should work to support women, and that men should be self sufficient. However, regardless of external forces the testosterone fueled male ego is pretty powerful and can make a man feel entitled to success and being seem as great whether or not he actually takes actions that reflect that entitlement. Hence higher levels of narcissistic males.

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tropical Delora said: 

Tryptamine said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Despite her mostly meritless and worthless existence, she will still be showered with followers and likes and compliments and it will give her all the narcissistic supply she needs to feel like her massive ego is justified when in fact it isn't.

In many ways, a woman's merit is based on her appearance, and the social value they have is often proportionate to their attractiveness.

 For me merit is based on effort. This is BR, I forgot Delora was logged on.

In what ways would you argue that males are entitled? 

I wouldn't say that our society encourages male entitlement so much.

What are your views on things like "The Patriarchy", and how men handle each other versus how women do? 

The typical view is that men should work to support women, and that men should be self sufficient. 

How typical would you say that view is now compared to past decades of American history? 

I'd say, with time, that women have effectively jumped into the "sufficiency" pool the men had been swimming in already, but that they brought different strategy to the table based on their once understood "role" in society. 

At this point we're all just trying to make it in this world, and some outdated views have the room to be used to try to make it in a world that's mostly past them beyond their room to reference them. 

However, regardless of external forces the testosterone fueled male ego is pretty powerful and can make a man feel entitled to success and being seem as great whether or not he actually takes actions that reflect that entitlement. Hence higher levels of narcissistic males. 

How much have you looked into the impacts of estrogen versus testosterone? 

I'd argue that excess in either direction can lead to entitlement issues. 

Turncoat said:

What are your views on things like "The Patriarchy", and how men handle each other versus how women do?

 I don't believe there is a patriarchy anymore, but I do believe that men still tend to pursue more powerful positions than women do, this is due to the sense of entitlement instilled in women by the notion that men ought to support them which is a traditionally patriarchal value that I oppose. I'd say it exists less than before though.

Turncoat said:

How typical would you say that view is now compared to past decades of American history?

 I'd say it is still relavent. Just because female self sufficiency is on the rise doesn't mean that male dependance is being pushed too. Men are still largely encouraged to be self sufficient, and now some more women are too. It is worth noting that the crazed left simultaneously encourages female self sufficiently while at the same time pushing an agenda that is largely based on dependance to daddy government.

Turncoat said:

How much have you looked into the impacts of estrogen versus testosterone?

 Testosterone tends to be associated with high energy, aggression, and sex drive as well as drive/motivation in general. Estrogen seems to produce more lethargy and emotional instability of the more neurotic kind. Testosterone is definitely more conducive to success based on the effects therefore men who have more of it will be more likely to succeed and therefore feel more entitled to success especially with the drive and aggression and energy it gives