Sociopath Community

Edvard said: 

Cawk said: 

you think if i got pissed off, i'd start posting cp again

I really don't think you'd do that. It would make no sense.

Except it's already happened before with some users here...

and that's how you'd get back at me for killing loona sc

You did not kill Luna's SC. I don't hold you or any single person responsible for it at all.

You kinda did for a while, saying we all triggered her by being annoying assholes and that all we needed to do was placate her. 

What changed? 

you constantly taunt me for not posting cp even :^)

The fuck? Where did you get this from? I am just pointing out the obvious: you will not post it

It's the same logic people used for blaming you for Sinister's suicide. 

you might be twice my age but in the end you lack the brain to manipulate me, bro

 I'm just laughing at you, not manipulating :D I mean I've posted pics of Tony too, haven't I.

I will say this: You do appear to believe Cawk is ineffective instead of a threat... now. 

Edvard said:

You don't think being purged on sight affected their activity on SC?

Getting a few spam posts in and being deleted a few minutes afterwards is hardly being an active poster or member of the community in anyone's book.

That stuff would stay up for hours, or be pushed pages back. 

Remember how mad you used to get when people'd quote Jim's posts? 

Jim's activity especially got extremely affected.

Also, look at Cawk, he got serious PTSD from his ban days haha

I think it's pride, which more says something about the things he finds pride in than any sort of PTSD trauma. 

Edvard said: 

Cawk said: 

you think if i got pissed off, i'd start posting cp again

I really don't think you'd do that. It would make no sense.

and that's how you'd get back at me for killing loona sc

You did not kill Luna's SC. I don't hold you or any single person responsible for it at all.

you constantly taunt me for not posting cp even :^)

The fuck? Where did you get this from? I am just pointing out the obvious: you will not post it, because you hated being the pariah on the old SC for it.

you might be twice my age but in the end you lack the brain to manipulate me, bro

 I'm just laughing at you, not manipulating :D I mean I've posted pics of Tony too, haven't I.

 AAHAHAHAHA if it helps you sleep at night

 I WIN NIGGER

>Also, look at Cawk, he got serious PTSD from his ban days haha

Turncoat is just very bitter, because anyone who Luna dared to make mod beside him, or even worse - in his place, left the equivalent of a painful gaping hole in his ass.

Inquirer may seem as a wallflower, and reserved, and he often jokes himself about it. However, every time shit was serious and some action was truly needed, he was there for the community. He has more spine than most here, by far more than Turncoat for example. Inquirer took the mod position like me, a bit reluctant, because without safety measures put in place by Luna, SC was threatened by CP posters who were shitting on the community as they pleased, while Turncoat was too weak to handle them. I talked to Inquirer a lot during those days, and we both agreed on an active way to combat the CP cesspit that SC became. And we had great success with it.

Also, when Luna shut SC down, Inquirer was the one who bought this domain, who worked and still works on code together with Meta, to keep this place functioning.

People tend to misread reserved individuals, as weak individuals who are wallflowers. But Inquirer proved to be a man of action exactly when it was needed, and with extreme efficiency. Don't underestimate him because he is quiet.

Turncoat said: 

Edvard said: 

Cawk said: 

you think if i got pissed off, i'd start posting cp again

I really don't think you'd do that. It would make no sense.

Except it's already happened before with some users here...

Again, I said CAWK doing it and letting people know it was him, would make no sense.

and that's how you'd get back at me for killing loona sc

You did not kill Luna's SC. I don't hold you or any single person responsible for it at all.

You kinda did for a while, saying we all triggered her by being annoying assholes and that all we needed to do was placate her. 

What changed? 

Nothing changed. Sadly not even your reading comprehension problems.

you constantly taunt me for not posting cp even :^)

The fuck? Where did you get this from? I am just pointing out the obvious: you will not post it

It's the same logic people used for blaming you for Sinister's suicide. 

I don't follow. I still refuse to believe anyone was serious about blaming me for that crap.

you might be twice my age but in the end you lack the brain to manipulate me, bro

 I'm just laughing at you, not manipulating :D I mean I've posted pics of Tony too, haven't I.

I will say this: You do appear to believe Cawk is ineffective instead of a threat... now. 

Yeah. I am amazed how you keep forgetting how the CP posters chased away almost all the SC userbase before measures were taken, measures which started with me being asked to be mod.

Edvard said:

You don't think being purged on sight affected their activity on SC?

The friction made their cocks harder. It's basic troll 101, and "purge on sight" as a measure just showed that they were a "big enough deal" to get that sort of reaction out of people. It's one of many paths of digging for worth. 

Also yeah, they were still on as "furryboy" and Jim made more than enough throwaway handles to have people see what he wanted them to see without it being for posterity, so your words mean nothing here. 

Getting a few spam posts in and being deleted a few minutes afterwards is hardly being an active poster or member of the community in anyone's book.

That stuff would stay up for hours, or be pushed pages back. 

Remember how mad you used to get when people'd quote Jim's posts?

Jim's activity especially got extremely affected.

Also, look at Cawk, he got serious PTSD from his ban days haha

I think it's pride, which more says something about the things he finds pride in than any sort of PTSD trauma. 

Pride about what? Cawk hated being banned, he even tried to negotiate with us just to be allowed back in.

NOBODY KILLED SC BUDDY

5 IQ

Cawk said: 

NOBODY KILLED SC BUDDY

There was no way to purge someone from a mobile device, dumbass. That was me being frustrated with Luna and Mike for not solving this issue. Which, by the way, got solved relatively soon after that.

Edvard said: 

Turncoat said: 

Edvard said: 

Cawk said: 

you think if i got pissed off, i'd start posting cp again

I really don't think you'd do that. It would make no sense.

Except it's already happened before with some users here...

Again, I said CAWK doing it and letting people know it was him, would make no sense.

He brags about that shit all the time with inflated percentages, and it makes sense as a matter of self-inflated troll pride. 

and that's how you'd get back at me for killing loona sc

You did not kill Luna's SC. I don't hold you or any single person responsible for it at all.

You kinda did for a while, saying we all triggered her by being annoying assholes and that all we needed to do was placate her. 

What changed? 

Nothing changed. Sadly not even your reading comprehension problems.

So you're really still meaning that we, as a collective effort, drove Luna to wreck SC then? 

you constantly taunt me for not posting cp even :^)

The fuck? Where did you get this from? I am just pointing out the obvious: you will not post it

It's the same logic people used for blaming you for Sinister's suicide. 

I don't follow. I still refuse to believe anyone was serious about blaming me for that crap.

The "taunting" thing, saying stuff like "Ehhh you'd never do it~". 

It begs for an "I'll show him!" natured reply. 

you might be twice my age but in the end you lack the brain to manipulate me, bro

 I'm just laughing at you, not manipulating :D I mean I've posted pics of Tony too, haven't I.

I will say this: You do appear to believe Cawk is ineffective instead of a threat... now. 

Yeah. I am amazed how you keep forgetting how the CP posters chased away almost all the SC userbase before measures were taken, measures which started with me being asked to be mod.

We each have our own spins on it, and ultimately what saved SC was people becoming jaded to CP. 

As I said from the start: If people'd stop being so damn triggered by the shit, they'd get bored. DON'T FEED THE TROLLS: 

Edvard said:

You don't think being purged on sight affected their activity on SC?

The friction made their cocks harder. It's basic troll 101, and "purge on sight" as a measure just showed that they were a "big enough deal" to get that sort of reaction out of people. It's one of many paths of digging for worth. 

Also yeah, they were still on as "furryboy" and Jim made more than enough throwaway handles to have people see what he wanted them to see without it being for posterity, so your words mean nothing here. 

I was always fine with Cawk or Jim using SC as long as they were not acting like themselves. I specifically told Cawk this at some point.

Getting a few spam posts in and being deleted a few minutes afterwards is hardly being an active poster or member of the community in anyone's book.

That stuff would stay up for hours, or be pushed pages back. 

Remember how mad you used to get when people'd quote Jim's posts?

That episode was before the rep system, before the anti-embed or anti-chat links measures.

Also, the "people" who kept stirring shit by quoting Jim were about 3 idiots or so, who ended up having their egos crushed by Luna. I loved it.

Jim's activity especially got extremely affected.

Also, look at Cawk, he got serious PTSD from his ban days haha

I think it's pride, which more says something about the things he finds pride in than any sort of PTSD trauma. 

Pride about what? Cawk hated being banned, he even tried to negotiate with us just to be allowed back in.

Infamy compensation through a reappraisal of the goal posts? 

it took you nearly 30 minutes to figure out you had to tap & hold, at which point my puppet got purged. i was watching and all

Cawk said: 

it took you nearly 30 minutes to figure out you had to tap & hold, at which point my puppet got purged. i was watching and all

 I did not have tap and hold... It was during a time when Inquirer was even demodded for not banning Jim while he was showing up online. There was no way to purge when I typed that.

It was after that that Mike put up another button in the upper left corner of the screen. You had to tap THAT, then it opened some sort of mod menu, and with normal taps, you could select users and purge/ban/whatever. THere never was a tap and hold option for mods to purge users from touchscreen devices.

Edvard said: 

Cawk said: 

it took you nearly 30 minutes to figure out you had to tap & hold, at which point my puppet got purged. i was watching and all

 I did not have tap and hold... It was during a time when Inquirer was even demodded for not banning Jim while he was showing up online. There was no way to purge when I typed that.

It was after that that Mike put up another button in the upper left corner of the screen. You had to tap THAT, then it opened some sort of mod menu, and with normal taps, you could select users and purge/ban/whatever. THere never was a tap and hold option for mods to purge users from touchscreen devices.

Yes there was, or at least there was when I had access to the controls. 

I think I even gave Inq that advice once (or at least something like it?).