Don't whip people; we live in enlightened and humanist times.
Ed's avatar is allegedly a picture of Cawk.
last edit on
5/15/2019 3:42:53 PM
Don't whip people; we live in enlightened and humanist times.
Ed's avatar is allegedly a picture of Cawk.
Uh oh Legga's not going to like this. You're adding fuel to the fire.
So I was just thinking of coming back here to make that post, see if there were any replies, sigh, and then go back to whipping my collaborators. I almost forgot all of that when I saw your new avatar.
Who's that?
One of the lonely virgin child porn posters, Cawk, posted himself with some messages for some forum users.
I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
So I was just thinking of coming back here to make that post, see if there were any replies, sigh, and then go back to whipping my collaborators. I almost forgot all of that when I saw your new avatar.
Who's that?
One of the lonely virgin child porn posters, Cawk, posted himself with some messages for some forum users.
Lmfao
We can't just let him get away with everything. After all, the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Fuck you, I'm tired of your BS Sensy/Inq. I only lurked for a second and guess who shows up, Sensy, risen from the ashes to spill out your suppressed emotions.
And don't lecture me about what is humane. You're like Hitler reborn. Seriously, you're so emotionless. Like a robot. But with a sexy pleasant voice. That's right. You're an emotionless sex robot. That's what you are, that's your character.
last edit on
5/16/2019 1:09:39 PM
his philosophical perfectionistic world-view that causes him problems can never be realized in practice.
Which ones?
I mean just look at Inquirer. He's a perfect example of a non-protagonist, exaggerated (and fake, admit it Inquirer you fucking bitch) evil character. He's also self-aware of the fact. Basically every. single. thing. Inquirer ever fucking says is in line with some intellectual, robot without emotion, evil-schemes-under-the-surface type character. I mean just look at his response to "What keeps you moving forward":
I figured that he was just naive.
Sorry I found myself lurking after all, and I couldn't resist now that Limey made this fantastic analogy.
This has been compared to the forum numerous times before now.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Edvard said:That said, what is even creepier, is Turncoat and I discussing GOT 2 years ago or so. He had this theory that Dany would become a crazy power hungry unstable character, when there was almost nothing to suggest it.
This was being foreshadowed since season 1.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
I figured that he was just naive.
Take cover.
Actually I have a question for you, too. Why the hell are you from Ohio? I find that something is off when 99% of the forum members are all from either Ohio or Sweden.
Sometimes I find myself playing with the thought that there are only three members on this forum -- myself, one Ohioan, and one Swedish guy.
last edit on
5/17/2019 4:12:41 PM
I mean just look at Inquirer. He's a perfect example of a non-protagonist, exaggerated (and fake, admit it Inquirer you fucking bitch) evil character. He's also self-aware of the fact. Basically every. single. thing. Inquirer ever fucking says is in line with some intellectual, robot without emotion, evil-schemes-under-the-surface type character. I mean just look at his response to "What keeps you moving forward":
I figured that he was just naive.
Naive about what?