Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

In Luna's SC, it was determined that a user can have any and all imagery of themselves removed from the site completely. We were also able to have our real names removed from the site upon request.

When, and who contributed? 

"In Luna's SC" when I was 'gone' and she had three other mods (if we don't include herself or "Michael") was said mods just doing whatever they wanted from Luna not promoting any specific guidelines while Ed was like "Lets just wing it guys, discussing rules is bad, plus we're here to handle Jim so lets just do that! Why you have to try to make things so complicated?" 

All three of you broke from the established rules and did your own thing in different ways at different points to varying degrees, and you weren't exempt. 

 Our own thing, like what ?

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

You skipped like an hour, but I guess you got a lot of it. There was the "I'm going to make the topic" bit that I said like three times alongside some other shtick. 

Since we didn't discuss the doxing situation before Inq's question I figured it wasn't important.

Inq coming in is what led to me saying it should be a topic, so naturally it came after. 

I mean i also skipped several weeks of the chat as well. And after that, the topic had changed, so I also figured its not part of the theme.

I meant that you skipped some of the actual, relevant story. 

Also... so it's totally cool to show things from the "secret mod chat" now? I'd not been sharing things from within it but does this make it free game or something..? 

It is not a secret and I've not shared anything private or personal and it is not by accident that I didn't.

I thought we weren't supposed to share things from it, but okay good to know it's not. 

Turncoat said: 

I thought we weren't supposed to share things from it, but okay good to know it's not. 

Nothing personal/private or something that may lead to site exploitation or w/e obviously, the discussion about the mod rules is neither.

And it was you that shared the fact we had a discussion about it in the first place. Even named it "changing the rules", instead of a discussion. I guess it was technically a lie, so maybe it didn't count as sharing what happened in the mod chat?

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

In Luna's SC, it was determined that a user can have any and all imagery of themselves removed from the site completely. We were also able to have our real names removed from the site upon request.

When, and who contributed? 

"In Luna's SC" when I was 'gone' and she had three other mods (if we don't include herself or "Michael") was said mods just doing whatever they wanted from Luna not promoting any specific guidelines while Ed was like "Lets just wing it guys, discussing rules is bad, plus we're here to handle Jim so lets just do that! Why you have to try to make things so complicated?" 

All three of you broke from the established rules and did your own thing in different ways at different points to varying degrees, and you weren't exempt. 

 Our own thing, like what ?

Lets start with an easy one, Edvard. 

To save me time, in what ways do you figure he abused his mod position? 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

I thought we weren't supposed to share things from it, but okay good to know it's not. 

Nothing personal/private or something that may lead to site exploitation or w/e obviously, the discussion about the mod rules is neither.

And it was you that shared the fact we had a discussion about it in the first place.

That's allusion instead of outright posting records. Talking of something is not the same as posting quotes. 

Even so, mostly checking for clarity. I'd been going with showing no records from it but now I know better. 

The mods love me.

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

I thought we weren't supposed to share things from it, but okay good to know it's not. 

Nothing personal/private or something that may lead to site exploitation or w/e obviously, the discussion about the mod rules is neither.

And it was you that shared the fact we had a discussion about it in the first place.

That's allusion instead of outright posting records. Talking of something is not the same as posting quotes. 

Even so, mostly checking for clarity. I'd been going with showing no records from it but now I know better. 

Well, you lied about it, assumed that no one can post records to disprove you and are now surprised someone did. How convenient it must have been before your surprise.

BohemianRhapsody said: 

The mods love me.

You're significantly more likable irl, and you're at least 1/5 of the way there. 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

I thought we weren't supposed to share things from it, but okay good to know it's not. 

Nothing personal/private or something that may lead to site exploitation or w/e obviously, the discussion about the mod rules is neither.

And it was you that shared the fact we had a discussion about it in the first place.

That's allusion instead of outright posting records. Talking of something is not the same as posting quotes. 

Even so, mostly checking for clarity. I'd been going with showing no records from it but now I know better. 

Well, you lied about it, assumed that no one can post records to disprove you and are now surprised someone did. How convenient it must have been before your surprise.

Actually I was tempted to post it (with the parts you're missing) to help my own argument, but figured "Mod chat's secret". 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

I thought we weren't supposed to share things from it, but okay good to know it's not. 

Nothing personal/private or something that may lead to site exploitation or w/e obviously, the discussion about the mod rules is neither.

And it was you that shared the fact we had a discussion about it in the first place.

That's allusion instead of outright posting records. Talking of something is not the same as posting quotes. 

Even so, mostly checking for clarity. I'd been going with showing no records from it but now I know better. 

Well, you lied about it, assumed that no one can post records to disprove you and are now surprised someone did. How convenient it must have been before your surprise.

Actually I was tempted to post it (with the parts you're missing) to help my own argument, but figured "Mod chat's secret". 

If it is nothing personal/private discussions (such as talks of other members, that's just awkward) or the stuff I've been talking about DDoS/other security/mod features, you can post it.