Correction. I said they don't want to, and on that note, they barely do.
Then “don’t want to” is unsupported mind-reading, while “barely cover it” concedes they did cover it. Not giving it the attention or conclusion you prefer is not suppression. Fauci was an adviser, not an enforcer, and his promotion of vaccination and other measures that reduced severe illness and transmission more than likely saved lives. Calling him a criminal still requires identifying an actual crime.
Is what it is. I see it. you don't.
You “see” a conspiracy because the coverage does not match your preferred framing. The clip itself admits CNN covered the hearing, while AP, Reuters, PBS and others did too. Fauci’s pardon was preemptive, not proof of crimes, and invoking the Fifth is a constitutional protection, not a confession.
Is what it is. I see it. you don't.
You “see” a conspiracy because the coverage does not match your preferred framing.
A false accusation.
The clip itself admits CNN covered the hearing, while AP, Reuters, PBS and others did too. Fauci’s pardon was preemptive, not proof of crimes, and invoking the Fifth is a constitutional protection, not a confession.
No one said they didn't. Even I'd tell you they covered it. I'm also saying they don't want to cover it cause they're not "covering" it.
You'd never admit it, but you know this is even happening because of me.
