Sociopath Community

Buttered Toast said: 

 THEY MADE ELEVEN MOVIES!? 

Dear lord they were Saw before Saw. 

Edit: "Clive Barker based his imagination of the Cenobites on what he personally saw during visits to BDSM dungeons during his youth, an interest that tracks throughout his work as a visual artist."

Well then... he, uh, saw it, as someone who will never understand. He saw this world as someone who could never get it, and made it out to be Hell while Heaven For Some. I get it, and I'd never describe it as he does. 

This connects to how proactive social aggression is often ignored or even admired as confidence, dominance, or “natural” hierarchy while reactive aggression is condemned. The aggressor stays tactical and socially acceptable; the target reacts imperfectly and is treated as the real problem.

ASMR for sleep:

Backing up what I said in chat ...not sure the same would apply to Dr. Doom, though.  He's like below or beside some threshold, if that makes sense.  Not sure if he's strong enough to want challenge so bad to accept self-defeat...

Anti vax ftw.

Spatial Mind said: 

Anti vax ftw.

“Anti-vax ftw” only confirms that your unscientific verdict came first. That hearing was not an honest search for truth. It was a hostile political trap where anything Fauci said could be clipped, stripped of context, and twisted into another accusation, even if doing so misled the public about health policy or what his office actually did. They had already decided he was guilty, then swore at him, insulted him directly, and threatened contempt when he would not cooperate with their script.

And “nothing says honesty like taking the Fifth” is not an argument. The Fifth exists precisely because hostile authorities can manipulate testimony, manufacture contradictions, and turn any answer into ammunition. Even if they eventually establish that the pardon limits his Fifth Amendment protection, that does not make their questioning neutral, truthful, or legitimate. Refusing to help produce misleading propaganda can be more honest than answering loaded questions designed to support a predetermined conclusion.

The hypocrisy is obvious too. Much of the same political right that called public-health mask policies authoritarian now supports masks when authorities use them to conceal their identities and avoid accountability. Their position is not consistently against masks or authoritarianism. It changes depending on who is exercising power and who is being targeted.

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Anti vax ftw.

“Anti-vax ftw” only confirms that your unscientific verdict came first. That hearing was not an honest search for truth. It was a hostile political trap where anything Fauci said could be clipped, stripped of context, and twisted into another accusation, even if doing so misled the public about health policy or what his office actually did. They had already decided he was guilty, then swore at him, insulted him directly, and threatened contempt when he would not cooperate with their script.

And “nothing says honesty like taking the Fifth” is not an argument. The Fifth exists precisely because hostile authorities can manipulate testimony, manufacture contradictions, and turn any answer into ammunition. Even if they eventually establish that the pardon limits his Fifth Amendment protection, that does not make their questioning neutral, truthful, or legitimate. Refusing to help produce misleading propaganda can be more honest than answering loaded questions designed to support a predetermined conclusion.

The hypocrisy is obvious too. Much of the same political right that called public-health mask policies authoritarian now supports masks when authorities use them to conceal their identities and avoid accountability. Their position is not consistently against masks or authoritarianism. It changes depending on who is exercising power and who is being targeted.

 I rejected the vaccine, cause it takes at least 10 years to develop one. 

The COVID19 vaccines started rolling out 1 year after the lockdown = A rush job.

When the first vaccine was released, 3 others rolled out that same week = A race.

Side effects of these vaccines included heart complications and one of them was discontinued for being too dangerous. Receiving these vaccines, we never had a choice of which one we'd get.

The vaccines did anything to prevent any spreads and vaccinated people still died, some vaccinated people had complications caused by the vaccine as well. But yeah. My reason for not taking the vaccine, was because it was rushed and other shit. This is scientific regardless of how unpopular the left made anti vaxxers.

If you know you know. 

Spatial Mind said: 

I rejected the vaccine, cause it takes at least 10 years to develop one. The COVID19 vaccines started rolling out 1 year after the lockdown = A rush job.

When the first vaccine was released, 3 others rolled out that same week = A race. Side effects of these vaccines included heart complications and one of them was discontinued for being too dangerous. Receiving these vaccines, we never had a choice of which one we'd get. The vaccines did anything to prevent any spreads and vaccinated people still died, some vaccinated people had complications caused by the vaccine as well. But yeah. My reason for not taking the vaccine, was because it was rushed and other shit. This is scientific regardless of how unpopular the left made anti vaxxers.

“Vaccines take ten years” is not a scientific rule. COVID vaccines moved faster because funding, trials, manufacturing, and review happened in parallel, using technology already studied for years.

Side effects and breakthrough infections do not prove they were useless. They reduced severe illness and death without eliminating all risk. It was also reasonable for some jobs, venues, and travel systems to restrict unvaccinated people during a contagious pandemic. Refusing vaccination was a choice, not a right to avoid every consequence. The video also conflates the lab-leak debate, vaccine effectiveness, and Fauci taking the Fifth as though one proves the others. 

Tell that to the manufacturer of the Johnson&Johnson vaccine.

When such things take time to make, and they all come out in the same week. I will be the one who decides if I find that concerning. 

Also the virus is engineered, not from a bat.

Finally. As it turns out, I never needed the vaccine.