Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
6 posts
0 votes

why are nudist child thrads being deleted?


Posts: 13

they are NOT illegal!! breaking your own rules now???

Posts: 32763
0 votes RE: why are nudist child th...
Sexual activity is not needed in the image to be considered pornography. The images may contain a nude picture of a child that is deemed sexually suggestive and be considered illegal.

I'd argue that the context of them being put on this website, alongside the nature of the posts around them's more than clear and apparent motivations, has more than established that they're being posted with sexuality in mind. Pair that with nudity on the children and it's a liability no-no. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 13
-1 votes RE: why are nudist child th...

the rules state no illegal content. my thread was legal. 

you are out of line faggot

Posts: 749
0 votes RE: why are nudist child th...

LMAO. They will be deleted out of the same reasons they were deleted on SC, and on EC. No one likes your idea of "free speech', and you have to suck it up buddy.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: why are nudist child th...
Sexual activity is not needed in the image to be considered pornography. The images may contain a nude picture of a child that is deemed sexually suggestive and be considered illegal.

I'd argue that the context of them being put on this website, alongside the nature of the posts around them's more than clear and apparent motivations, has more than established that they're being posted with sexuality in mind. Pair that with nudity on the children and it's a liability no-no. 

 The intent/context behind posts don't matter. What matters is if the media is sexual or not. Regular nudist photos are legal, regardless of what mental gymnastics you pull.

last edit on 5/1/2019 9:57:00 PM
Posts: 749
0 votes RE: why are nudist child th...
Cawk said: 
Sexual activity is not needed in the image to be considered pornography. The images may contain a nude picture of a child that is deemed sexually suggestive and be considered illegal.

I'd argue that the context of them being put on this website, alongside the nature of the posts around them's more than clear and apparent motivations, has more than established that they're being posted with sexuality in mind. Pair that with nudity on the children and it's a liability no-no. 

 The intent/context behind posts don't matter. What matters is if the media is sexual or not. Regular nudist photos are legal, regardless of what mental gymnastics you pull.

 You're still too dumb to see, this is about what the rest of the members want to have around, not about your shitty idea of free speech.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
6 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.