Sociopath Community

Then... then what is a pedo? 

Those who shout the loudest usually have the most to hide. 

Whorechata said: 

How incredibly odd is it that primal, the person that talks against pedophilia is someone that's constantly involved with Pedophiles or apologizing for them?

Cawk gives her a bit of attention and boom, he's no longer a pedophile

I unearth actual facts about David M. Aten aka David Stodghill aka Psychopath Dave and his involvement in raping his youngest daughters(1992) and indecent assault of a 12yo girl sometime in 2009/2010 but I'm the one desperately shrieking and covering up for child grooming??

Ah primal I hope your descent into madness brings us more memes

 

 IS SHE STILL RUMINATING OVER ME STEALING HER PLAYTHING CAWK FROM HER LOL

I've talked with Primal directly about many issues including this one.
She is insane, does not listen to reason.
She sees what is happening is the opposite of her belief, I talk to her for hours to show her that she is wrong on every angle and then she just flat out denies reality.

So you see, there is no reasoning.
She will morph reality to suit her ideas, no matter what.

Cawk posts child porn every day here now and in the past, he talked about fucking children, how being a pedo is good and how he is a pedo directly every day, but Primal was/still prob is besties with him. While Primal declared her self the big anti-pedo person and said Sturm is a pedo for associating with Jim, which to my knowledge has never happened. Cawk tho, he can associate with Jim apparently.

She is again convinced that Sturm had him banned and apparently Cawk thinks so too? It seems the insanity is infectious, so it is best to quarantine BZ.
According to her, this thread is fake: https://sociopathcommunity.com/Forum/Topic/3226/1/petition-to-ban-please-ban-cawk- 

There are 3 reasons to ban him and neither of them has anything to do with Sturm, so delusional:

1. He has posted CP
2. Everyone wanted him gone
3. I do not want pro-pedophilia content on my forum

The fact he was tolerated after the CP was a mistake. Me not seeing that everyone wanted him gone was a mistake. I went out of my way to not ban him.

I am not concerned anyone here believes her or him, but I want to show you the extends of Primals madness.

Wait, what? Now Jim and I are besties? Since when? I've never spoken to Jim. I've never spoken to Sugar to the best of my knowledge and only spoken with Alena a few times briefly on Discord. 

It wasn't but a couple of months ago she denied stating I was a pedo or pro pedo.. whatever it is, when she had mad that accusation. Now she's back to that accusation. She's beyond medication. 

Good said: 

She sees what is happening is the opposite of her belief, I talk to her for hours to show her that she is wrong on every angle and then she just flat out denies reality.

So you see, there is no reasoning.

From my experience, she has a sweet spot between stonewalling and just starting to listen where she'll actually retain what you're saying. 

In your case though your connections root "too deep" to "the enemy". 

She will morph reality to suit her ideas, no matter what.

It was pretty fun to see her and Cawk echo chamber off of each other on Discord. Might be the same going on at Luna's soon enough. 

She is again convinced that Sturm had him banned and apparently Cawk thinks so too? It seems the insanity is infectious, so it is best to quarantine BZ.

His... err, spin, is at least built from a consistent basis this time from rant-to-rant. It's not like how his sense of value vs devalue for a person reflects in how intelligent he sees them, this one's more locked in, and was without Primal's help. Those two having a "common enemy" however is bound to make the stories spin out of control once they start trading notes inevitably. 

He thinks that Sturm's why you're rehosting the forum, that you're basically her dog, and that whatever you do can be credited to her giving you orders (with mods as the third rung of authority). As far as he's concerned, he broke you down and you had to become a tool of another to try again based on your history as a sub. 

...little does he know how pushy subs can really be when it comes to persistence. 

According to her, this thread is fake: https://sociopathcommunity.com/Forum/Topic/3226/1/petition-to-ban-please-ban-cawk-

Hahaha what? 

There are 3 reasons to ban him and neither of them has anything to do with Sturm, so delusional:

1. He has posted CP

Continues to even. 

2. Everyone wanted him gone

If not for the CP shit I'd not mind him being back, but at this point he's proven too erratic and prone to reinterpretation of events to be held truly accountable. 

It's past Blacklist practices now, and what room he had to build sympathy he flushed down the toilet for some temporary rebuff on his fragile sense of reality. 

Seriously check the entirety of BZ's chat log, much of it's just him talking to himself and sizing people up or down based directly on his more recent interactions with him. If I continued to mock his avatars he'd continue to place me lower on the ranking most likely. 

Check it: 

[Insert missing Discord clips of him calling Tryp and myself genius based on nothing tangible and not worth taking seriously]









It's great, it basically shows us his idea of how much he respects and/or likes them instead of actual intelligence. 

3. I do not want pro-pedophilia content on my forum

I still prefer to handle it as a spam problem. 

The fact he was tolerated after the CP was a mistake. Me not seeing that everyone wanted him gone was a mistake. I went out of my way to not ban him. 

I figured he could be conditioned towards better behavior. 

I was wrong, his foundation's too morphic and his ego too prone to persecution inversions as a cope. 

I am not concerned anyone here believes her or him, but I want to show you the extends of Primals madness.

The ones who fall into it are about as interesting as the ones who fell into Angee's traps, except Primal's completely in her own hype. 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

According to her, this thread is fake: https://sociopathcommunity.com/Forum/Topic/3226/1/petition-to-ban-please-ban-cawk-

Hahaha what?

I should of elaborate, she never said it directly and I forgot that she is the type that might say that directly, so without elaborating people may think she did lol. But what she said means that she must think that thread is fake, otherwise she makes no sense, among many other things that have to change to make what she says make sense.

Primal always had a "complicated" (hypocritical) relationship with pedophiles. She is obsessed with them.  

She said her ex was a pedophile. She flirted incessantly with whoameye  - SC's only openly self-professed pedophile. And now she is with Cawk. Big surprise. ~

Calling others pedos while associating with people who actually demonstrate pedophilia is a fucked-up and worn out narrative of hers. All she does is raise more suspicion against herself.

And, accusing others of being pedophiles is a pretty classic schtick >
 https://www.wired.com/story/crying-pedophile-is-the-oldest-propaganda-trick-in-the-book/

You know, there are people who yell at everyone as if they're terrible for having the traits they're attracted to, but once they find that person who's 125% of those very traits they find themselves in a lustful fugue. 

Maybe she's not a pedo herself, but maybe pedos are her type?