Sociopath Community

I believe we started defining spam and disruptive content on old SC due to there being disagreements what those are. Mainly due to Luna and Edvards corrupt modding decisions. Now that we have a decent staff, I am much more comfortable with allowing some freedom for the mods and admins to judge content on how shitty it is.

I think not many will disagree that Cawk is cancer, and the bad kind of cancer at that. So what we're arguing is technicalities while everyone's more or less on the same page. We all know what we're referencing here so let's just allow the mods to delete Cawk spam as they see fit and if one of them messes up the community will react. 

Xadem said: 

I believe we started defining spam and disruptive content on old SC due to there being disagreements what those are. Mainly due to Luna and Edvards corrupt modding decisions. Now that we have a decent staff, I am much more comfortable with allowing some freedom for the mods and admins to judge content on how shitty it is.

I think not many will disagree that Cawk is cancer, and the bad kind of cancer at that. So what we're arguing is technicalities while everyone's more or less on the same page. We all know what we're referencing here so let's just allow the mods to delete Cawk spam as they see fit and if one of them messes up the community will react. 

I don't want other people spamming the shit that cawk spams either

Good said: 

Xadem said: 

I believe we started defining spam and disruptive content on old SC due to there being disagreements what those are. Mainly due to Luna and Edvards corrupt modding decisions. Now that we have a decent staff, I am much more comfortable with allowing some freedom for the mods and admins to judge content on how shitty it is.

I think not many will disagree that Cawk is cancer, and the bad kind of cancer at that. So what we're arguing is technicalities while everyone's more or less on the same page. We all know what we're referencing here so let's just allow the mods to delete Cawk spam as they see fit and if one of them messes up the community will react. 

I don't want other people spamming the shit that cawk spams either

 Well duh

Xadem said: 

Good said: 

Xadem said: 

I believe we started defining spam and disruptive content on old SC due to there being disagreements what those are. Mainly due to Luna and Edvards corrupt modding decisions. Now that we have a decent staff, I am much more comfortable with allowing some freedom for the mods and admins to judge content on how shitty it is.

I think not many will disagree that Cawk is cancer, and the bad kind of cancer at that. So what we're arguing is technicalities while everyone's more or less on the same page. We all know what we're referencing here so let's just allow the mods to delete Cawk spam as they see fit and if one of them messes up the community will react. 

I don't want other people spamming the shit that cawk spams either

 Well duh

 thats why general rules are better

Good said: 

Xadem said: 

Good said: 

Xadem said: 

I believe we started defining spam and disruptive content on old SC due to there being disagreements what those are. Mainly due to Luna and Edvards corrupt modding decisions. Now that we have a decent staff, I am much more comfortable with allowing some freedom for the mods and admins to judge content on how shitty it is.

I think not many will disagree that Cawk is cancer, and the bad kind of cancer at that. So what we're arguing is technicalities while everyone's more or less on the same page. We all know what we're referencing here so let's just allow the mods to delete Cawk spam as they see fit and if one of them messes up the community will react. 

I don't want other people spamming the shit that cawk spams either

 Well duh

 thats why general rules are better

 I'm not saying not to define anything, I'm saying the definitions are pretty much clear already 

HAHAHHAA I got an ERROR 1008 code just now

"ACCESS DENIED - THE OWNER OF THIS WEBSITE HAS BANNED YOUR IP ADDRESS "

I'm enjoying this so much: the community reaching the conclusion, AGAIN, in almost identical circumstances, that the actions implemented on SC when I became mod are the most adequate course of action. This, when the situation right now is not even half as bad as it was back then. The very same people who fought it tooth and nail the first time get to see it happening again, and I'm laughing at them so hard right now.

Edvard said: 

HAHAHHAA I got an ERROR 1008 code just now

"ACCESS DENIED - THE OWNER OF THIS WEBSITE HAS BANNED YOUR IP ADDRESS "

I'm enjoying this so much: the community reaching the conclusion, AGAIN, in almost identical circumstances, that the actions implemented on SC when I became mod are the most adequate course of action. This, when the situation right now is not even half as bad as it was back then. The very same people who fought it tooth and nail the first time get to see it happening again, and I'm laughing at them so hard right now.

Your words don't feel like you're laughing, they sense more like frustration and you want people to imagine you to be gloating as your form of revenge 

You sound sour

Xadem said: 

Edvard said: 

HAHAHHAA I got an ERROR 1008 code just now

"ACCESS DENIED - THE OWNER OF THIS WEBSITE HAS BANNED YOUR IP ADDRESS "

I'm enjoying this so much: the community reaching the conclusion, AGAIN, in almost identical circumstances, that the actions implemented on SC when I became mod are the most adequate course of action. This, when the situation right now is not even half as bad as it was back then. The very same people who fought it tooth and nail the first time get to see it happening again, and I'm laughing at them so hard right now.

Your words don't feel like you're laughing, they sense more like frustration and you want people to imagine you to be gloating as your form of revenge 

You sound sour

 I swear on my balls I am enjoying this immensely. I'm no mod here, I have no duty to fix this mess right now, and it feels great to just watch the people who fought with me back in the day squirm. At least a couple of their egos will take blows, and I only have to watch this time :D

Edvard said: 

HAHAHHAA I got an ERROR 1008 code just now

"ACCESS DENIED - THE OWNER OF THIS WEBSITE HAS BANNED YOUR IP ADDRESS "

I'm enjoying this so much: the community reaching the conclusion, AGAIN, in almost identical circumstances, that the actions implemented on SC when I became mod are the most adequate course of action. This, when the situation right now is not even half as bad as it was back then. The very same people who fought it tooth and nail the first time get to see it happening again, and I'm laughing at them so hard right now.

Report if that happens again, I will unban that IP.

Get rid of the shit, valueless threads he makes. If anything or even nothing takes it's place it's a better move for the forum. 

The line should be drawn on the deletion of topics if it's multiple clickbait threads with an emphasis on making people reactionary. I'd put a thread limit at 3 per day on him, or on anyone in general tbh.

As far as banning him goes, im impartial. We all know he's behind the CP shit at this point, we're only putting up with it out of principle. I believe that is important. One day, just maybe he'll get some self esteem and stop power tripping on thinking he's a clever machiavellian mastermind by posting dead baby pics