Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 195 posts
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: Petition to ban, Please...

Cawk is untouchable, if he doesn't exist here  then this place will not either

 

this thread is retarded considering our community values

 

This place wouldn't be the same if there weren't things to disgust others.

Finally some true OGs speaking up.

This negates the mod abuse bandwagon they have going on me. Thanks.

Posts: 33255
0 votes RE: Petition to ban, Please...

Oh my yes, I suppose this makes the spam and CP acceptable, huh? 

Nothing's changed. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: Petition to ban, Please...

Oh my yes, I suppose this makes the spam and CP acceptable, huh? 

Nothing's changed. 

 Why are you trying to dismiss pro pedo talk and gore as spam? I haven't stepped out of line in regards of spam, haven't been repetitive whatsoever in what I posted, yet you still delete my posts.

You don't have to make it appear to be something it's not to shield these losers, Turncoat. Just say they can't handle it and you delete it for that reason, I'd shut up for good.

Posts: 33255
0 votes RE: Petition to ban, Please...
Cawk said: 

Oh my yes, I suppose this makes the spam and CP acceptable, huh? 

Nothing's changed. 

 Why are you trying to dismiss pro pedo talk and gore as spam?

Sheer volume and repetition, and the pedo speech hasn't itself been directly targeted. 

It's the same as when I was modding for Luna, and what let you skate by this long was pure leniency. Your still being around is technically against the agreed upon rules as they've always been. 

I haven't stepped out of line in regards of spam

For topic posts at least, it's mostly because no one's willing to discuss how much spam is spam when it comes to sheer volume, so this is correct. 

haven't been repetitive whatsoever in what I posted

Search history begs to differ. 

You don't have to make it appear to be something it's not to shield these losers, Turncoat. Just say they can't handle it and you delete it for that reason, I'd shut up for good.

I do have to handle spam and CP however. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 7/29/2019 10:45:24 AM
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: Petition to ban, Please...
Cawk said: 

Oh my yes, I suppose this makes the spam and CP acceptable, huh? 

Nothing's changed. 

 Why are you trying to dismiss pro pedo talk and gore as spam?

Sheer volume and repetition, and the pedo speech hasn't itself been directly targeted. 

It's the same as when I was modding for Luna, and what let you skate by this long was pure leniency. Your still being around is technically against the agreed upon rules as they've always been. 

I haven't stepped out of line in regards of spam

Mostly because no one's willing to discuss how much spam is spam when it comes to sheer volume, so this is correct. 

Mods had agreed half page or less doesn't constitute as spam.

haven't been repetitive whatsoever in what I posted

Search history begs to differ. 

The pro pedo talk at some points, yes, but not a few different images of dead cats. That was blatant shielding of users.

Posts: 33255
0 votes RE: Petition to ban, Please...
Cawk said: 
Cawk said: 

Oh my yes, I suppose this makes the spam and CP acceptable, huh? 

Nothing's changed. 

 Why are you trying to dismiss pro pedo talk and gore as spam?

Sheer volume and repetition, and the pedo speech hasn't itself been directly targeted. 

It's the same as when I was modding for Luna, and what let you skate by this long was pure leniency. Your still being around is technically against the agreed upon rules as they've always been. 

I haven't stepped out of line in regards of spam

Mostly because no one's willing to discuss how much spam is spam when it comes to sheer volume, so this is correct. 

Mods had agreed half page or less doesn't constitute as spam.

It was negotiated to that point yes, and I haven't denied that at all. The others still seem to hate it but as long as they aren't willing to negotiate those terms then you're still within the acceptable guidelines when it comes to sheer number of topics as a sole factor. 

This however doesn't negate the repetition clause. 

haven't been repetitive whatsoever in what I posted

Search history begs to differ. 

The pro pedo talk at some points, yes, but not a few different images of dead cats. That was blatant shielding of users.

The "dead cats" are you repeating yourself across a fairly large span, and it's been quite repetitious across a wide span of topics. 

Instrument for instance kept most of his shitposting in but a few threads with a good duration of time between them, while you outright flood the place some days. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: Petition to ban, Please...
Cawk said: 
Cawk said: 

Oh my yes, I suppose this makes the spam and CP acceptable, huh? 

Nothing's changed. 

 Why are you trying to dismiss pro pedo talk and gore as spam?

Sheer volume and repetition, and the pedo speech hasn't itself been directly targeted. 

It's the same as when I was modding for Luna, and what let you skate by this long was pure leniency. Your still being around is technically against the agreed upon rules as they've always been. 

I haven't stepped out of line in regards of spam

Mostly because no one's willing to discuss how much spam is spam when it comes to sheer volume, so this is correct. 

Mods had agreed half page or less doesn't constitute as spam.

It was negotiated to that point yes, and I haven't denied that at all. The others still seem to hate it but as long as they aren't willing to negotiate those terms then you're still within the acceptable guidelines when it comes to sheer number of topics as a sole factor. 

That is because in reality, for them, it's about content they can't handle and want gone by any means, not spam. Here you are, not only betraying principles but also unwilling to admit and continuing to play off shielding them from pedo talk and gore as removing "repetitive" content.

Do you think I am an idiot or something not to see through this shit?



This however doesn't negate the repetition clause. 

haven't been repetitive whatsoever in what I posted

Search history begs to differ. 

The pro pedo talk at some points, yes, but not a few different images of dead cats. That was blatant shielding of users.

The "dead cats" are you repeating yourself across a fairly large span

How could I have been repetitive? That was the first time ever I posted dead cats here.

and it's been quite repetitious across a wide span of topics. 

3 posts and 1 topic of different images isn't repetitive.

I'm on your blacklist of users to take mod action on, even when I haven't crossed the line. This is how it is.



Instrument for instance kept most of his shitposting in but a few threads with a good duration of time between them, while you outright flood the place some days. 

 I don't know who Instrument was, I can't make a comparison there.

Posts: 5402
0 votes RE: Petition to ban, Please...

Can't we just decide already? 

MissC was going to make that thread about sanctions for users that we could vote on. But she disappeared. 

Also, we should decide on what kind of SC we want. As it is now, we're still arguing technicalities while most of us are more or less on the same page. What's this gridlock good for? 

Posts: 33255
0 votes RE: Petition to ban, Please...
Xadem said: 

Can't we just decide already? 

MissC was going to make that thread about sanctions for users that we could vote on. But she disappeared. 

Also, we should decide on what kind of SC we want. As it is now, we're still arguing technicalities while most of us are more or less on the same page. What's this gridlock good for? 

It always goes this way, save for when CP was at it's prime. The way the site now is actually closer to the average desired, but like most compromises people hate that it's not entirely as they'd individually desire. That's how despite the uniform dislike towards one person how people have shown a variety of expressions in relation to it, and many others are choosing to just watch in silence instead of stepping forward even now. 

People seem to want to bitch about what they hate and then just yell "you handle it" or "ban the blasphemer". They typically don't want to single themselves out, and if they do they don't tend to be the "ideas" type. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 7/29/2019 7:36:38 PM
Posts: 675
0 votes RE: Petition to ban, Please...

If I am given mod, I promise to handle it.

10 / 195 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.