I am reading all of these feminist books and stuff and I made a tinder in New Jersey and within range of New York the other night (looking for a long term relationship- prob not the correct app for that) and none of the men were attractive to me, and I already know that I see women as physically and psychologically beautiful, and men as.... not very much fuck
just joking
just joking
maybe I just need like a super feminist boyfriend if I date anyone ever again or something ?? ooh my god I do not think that any of them will ever be genuinely (not the fake encouragers of womens low self esteem, both obviously and more subtley subversive) feminist enough for me FUCK MY LIFE
just joking
just joking
As I said. No such thing as lesbians. they are bisexual women angry at men, for whatever reason.
"But she says she never been with a man and afraid of pickle shaped objects"
Ha ha ha. And most women are open about their true bodycount~
.
.
.
I don't see it as a bad thing if Emily wants to run off with some stranger and it's probably a good thing that she doesn't have any offspring.
You're not just expressing an opinion here. You're making a factual claim that lesbians don't exist and that every lesbian is actually bisexual, and the evidence doesn't support that.
Research has documented women who report being exclusively attracted to women, including population-level studies that specifically identify women who have only ever experienced sexual attraction to women. Studies also distinguish lesbian and bisexual women based on their patterns of attraction, with lesbian women generally showing more exclusive same-sex attraction than bisexual women.
The fact that sexual identity, attraction, and behavior don't always line up perfectly doesn't prove that lesbians are secretly bisexual. It means those are different dimensions of sexuality.
So “lesbian at best is a state of bisexuality” isn't an evidence-based conclusion. You're simply redefining lesbianism so that the category cannot exist, then treating that definition as proof.
