That's why you're hard of learning. You want to talk about what you dislike about others instead of the input. There you are suggesting what I say is "potentially harmful" lol. Guy I'm too rough for you. You should probably mingle with a softer crowd who place political correctness above all else. As for my output. It holds true, no matter how ugly one finds the truth.
You're still not distinguishing between discussing you personally and discussing what you've actually said. Your “input” consists of the claims and arguments you've made, so explaining why those claims are false, unsupported, or potentially harmful is directly responding to the input.
You also haven't actually answered any of the points I made. “You're hard of learning” is just another personal attack, and “I'm too rough for you” is more self-congratulatory posturing. Neither one establishes that your reasoning is correct.
And I didn't say your arguments are harmful merely because I dislike them. I said some of your arguments can be potentially harmful, which is a substantive claim about their implications. Laughing at the word “potentially” doesn't refute that.
“People who place political correctness above all else” is also a strawman. Criticizing bad reasoning and personal attacks has nothing to do with demanding that you be politically correct or “soft.”
Finally, “my output holds true” is not an argument. Truth isn't established by insisting that your statements remain true regardless of how ugly you think they are. You still have to demonstrate that they're true. Otherwise you're just declaring your own conclusions immune to criticism.