yes, there is a self-preservation instinct. your brain stem keeps you going, and there are all of these pathways to maintain homeostasis. but what i mean is that describing things in terms of functions becomes inadequate. and people handle this in all sorts of ways, even by avoiding it entirely. and that does not mean just become religious, though i wish it were that simple. but it does mean you have to find a reason to be here, and not just that you are alive
I do not think a person needs a larger reason to be here beyond the causes already producing their behavior. Describing those causes as functions does not make them inadequate; it only removes the extra story placed over them. People continue because their brains generate preferences, attachments, curiosity, habits, pleasure, and aversion to death. An overarching purpose is not necessary to produce motivation. Ironically, pressure to find a purpose can create the very risks you associate with nihilism, and possibly greater ones. It can delude people into treating danger, or unreasonable expectations as meaningful obligations. A lack of cosmic purpose does not require recklessness, whereas an invented purpose can actively justify it.
Tryptamine said:participating in society?
There is no singular act of “participating in society,” because society is not one coherent entity. It is a label for many institutions, industries, and hierarchies.
Behavior comes from reactive brain systems: the amygdala and stress circuits register threat, dopamine pathways reinforce expected rewards, the basal ganglia automate repeated responses, and the prefrontal cortex compares likely outcomes using information shaped by memory and conditioning. These systems can steer separate organisms, but they do not create a shared subject or collective purpose.