Sociopath Community

I like 2 black btiches with huge strapons thx 

Being bi's weirdly a rough road even in the LGBTQ+ community, we've seen Blanc have to try to handle it too on this forum. 

The idea that we have both choices often has us ostracized as if we're 'fakers' within either side, and promotes us as if we're more promiscuous, enabling our suffrage through appealing to the 'well they can cheat on you with literally anybody' angle. This lets both straight and gay people hate on them via the same argument, and wow can exes bitch about their lost love going for 'the other team' hardcore within both straight and gay circles, both presuming some level of traitorousness over it which is both silly and sad. 

This is why so many bisexuals are either in denial or call themselves shit like 'sapiosexual' to cope with the perception of the label, even though we're in this setup the most open minded to the point of our own downfall. Even the idea of switching teams to me sounds silly. That's a bisexual person in denial of enjoying both on some level and many would never have this choice themselves no matter how much they learn to dislike the otherwise currently appealing gender. 

If insecure people'd rather date virgins, then bisexuals are almost the opposite via trope presumptions in media and in many ways life as well. I've always been of the thought that Christians who try to say 'who you are attracted to is a choice' are closet bisexuals themselves who play up the easy road while demonizing those who express their freedoms more broadly and those who never had the choice, reflecting bisexual privilege within religion by only choosing 'the expected' path. It's like being gay but having both choices, so go figure religious ones would choose 'God's Path'. 

The idea that we have a choice in the matter, that we could pick either, also in some ways invalidates how truly homosexual people lack this agency. Bisexuality is a privilege that is shat on by those who cannot be that themselves, and many who can make such a choice do so either out of philosophy or damage when we could have simply chosen both as an answer. 

TLDR; I'm thankful to be Bisexual. 

It's a privilege that others are just jealous or in denial over. 

Tc I agree with everything you are saying here

man i wish i was bi

Turncoat said: 

TLDR; I'm thankful to be Bisexual. 

It's a privilege that others are just jealous or in denial over. 

Nonsense.  

I'm pretty sure both straight and homosexual people don't envy bisexuals, nor does anyone give a damn about other people's sexuality unless it's someone they want to fuck. 

Bisexuals are more available than lesbians and homosexual men. For a man it beats having the hots for a lesbian. ( I kid you not. I'd be damned if I had the hots for a lesbian )

There are no lesbians either. Only women who call themselves that. Every one of them I've ever seen had dick before. Lesbian isn't a real sexuality, it's just a bunch of man haters. The L in LGB is the only gender specific title, but really they are the B, and there is hope for them yet. This upsets no one.  

.

.

.

Homosexuality is nothing to take pride in. Its dysfunctional.

Marching around flaunting any type of sexuality is perverted. Doing this is only useful for a promiscuous whore, which is someone to be used, discarded, and devalued with a chance of catching an STD. Some will take pride in surface level, or open relationships, or at least, they'll say so, while being attached to such a person is a curse as it's not someone to rely on.

.

.

.

Here's some fat bitches in burqas who hate homosexuals and will teach their children to hate homosexuals. These people have more purpose and reason than those they hate. It's interesting how the Christians built a nation where faggots can exist in peace, while the American faggot likes to talk smack about the Christians but never the Muslims who actually kill homos in certain parts of the world. 

Honestly, when you're dumb it's your fault. 

Spatial Mind said:

 

Turncoat said: 

TLDR; I'm thankful to be Bisexual. 

It's a privilege that others are just jealous or in denial over. 

Nonsense.  

I'm pretty sure both straight and homosexual people don't envy bisexuals, nor does anyone give a damn about other people's sexuality unless it's someone they want to fuck. 

So by your understanding, homosexual people would have no beef with bisexual privilege, even though one of them has classically had to face problems with it while the other has been granted the means to hide more easily in plain sight? 

Bisexuals are more available than lesbians and homosexual men. For a man it beats having the hots for a lesbian. ( I kid you not. I'd be damned if I had the hots for a lesbian )

...until you see them giving eyes to both sexes, or until you're left a bitter husk if they 'switch teams on you'. 

Your odds of a threesome with two women by being with a bisexual woman isn't as high as you'd think. 

There are no lesbians either. Only women who call themselves that. Every one of them I've ever seen had dick before.

That's like saying there's no gay dudes because they slapped cheeks before with hard cock, or ate a woman out before. I also don't imagine too many homo/bi-sexuals coming out to someone like you, at least when compared to a 'deviant' like me who'd actually be understanding. 

I've met plenty of 'vag'etarians when it comes to sex, and many cases of homosexuality (rather than bi denial) expressing a hetero-history have been more a byproduct of cultural expectation than sexuality. Speaking to many about it (such as repressed christians) tend to sound somewhere between numb to disturbed over the heterosexual encounter, similarly to if you suddenly woke up with a dick in your mouth. 

Lesbian isn't a real sexuality, it's just a bunch of man haters. The L in LGB is the only gender specific title, but really they are the B, and there is hope for them yet. This upsets no one.  

Dude there are even lesbians who refuse to use phallus-shaped sex toys, you have no idea how deep this all goes. 

Homosexuality is nothing to take pride in. Its dysfunctional.

And by contrast bisexuality can actually make the choice.

If I want to be with a sexy man, that's a choice I can make more readily than heterosexual people, and by contrast I can then be with a woman further down the line more readily than a homosexual person could. 

It's a privilege, I can make choices others lack. 

Marching around flaunting any type of sexuality is perverted. 

You try having your sexuality oppressed for centuries, let alone matters of race and gender. 

But relating to that'd require sympathy.

Doing this is only useful for a promiscuous whore, which is someone to be used, discarded, and devalued with a chance of catching an STD. Some will take pride in surface level, or open relationships, or at least, they'll say so, while being attached to such a person is a curse as it's not someone to rely on.

I'd rather have someone with experience than a total virgin, virgins are for people too insecure to let themselves feel compared to others over a perceived inadequacy of their own. 

If the sorts of men that often fits this archetype were confident, they wouldn't need a woman to tell them 'they're the best' and other sad shit like that. 

Here's some fat bitches in burqas who hate homosexuals and will teach their children to hate homosexuals. These people have more purpose and reason than those they hate. It's interesting how the Christians built a nation where faggots can exist in peace, while the American faggot likes to talk smack about the Christians but never the Muslims who actually kill homos in certain parts of the world. 

This right here is the definition of false equivalence. 

Turncoat said: 

Being bi's weirdly a rough road even in the LGBTQ+ community, we've seen Blanc have to try to handle it too on this forum. 

The idea that we have both choices often has us ostracized as if we're 'fakers' within either side, and promotes us as if we're more promiscuous, enabling our suffrage through appealing to the 'well they can cheat on you with literally anybody' angle. This lets both straight and gay people hate on them via the same argument, and wow can exes bitch about their lost love going for 'the other team' hardcore within both straight and gay circles, both presuming some level of traitorousness over it which is both silly and sad. 

This is why so many bisexuals are either in denial or call themselves shit like 'sapiosexual' to cope with the perception of the label, even though we're in this setup the most open minded to the point of our own downfall. Even the idea of switching teams to me sounds silly. That's a bisexual person in denial of enjoying both on some level and many would never have this choice themselves no matter how much they learn to dislike the otherwise currently appealing gender. 

If insecure people'd rather date virgins, then bisexuals are almost the opposite via trope presumptions in media and in many ways life as well. I've always been of the thought that Christians who try to say 'who you are attracted to is a choice' are closet bisexuals themselves who play up the easy road while demonizing those who express their freedoms more broadly and those who never had the choice, reflecting bisexual privilege within religion by only choosing 'the expected' path. It's like being gay but having both choices, so go figure religious ones would choose 'God's Path'. 

The idea that we have a choice in the matter, that we could pick either, also in some ways invalidates how truly homosexual people lack this agency. Bisexuality is a privilege that is shat on by those who cannot be that themselves, and many who can make such a choice do so either out of philosophy or damage when we could have simply chosen both as an answer. 

 wat abt being a cuck