See the difference between us, I'm not making any guesses here.Yes, you assert without presenting proof whereas I dont.
Ignorance again is it ?
I just gave you 3 pieces. How Jerome Powell crashed the market 1,2 trillion dollars, I gave you the bloomberg terminal, and I gave you a message from Grok.
As usual you want me to do your homework for you. You have search engines and Ai, yet you're head is so in the clouds you require a demonstration from someone you doubt. such is the way with you.How condescending and arrogant of you.
Now let me see... I said:
I reckon you can find select examples where news are relevant,Then you find a select example:
This one's a beauty. From the time he said good morning, the market started crashing to hell.I guess I was right. Shocking.
Look at you moving the goal post. Let's start with my quote at the top there with a screenshot....
You got your evidence, and it's been ignored.
Looks like you're hard of learning.
You said that there's a derivation starting from game theory and first principles to stock market behavior, and a model that cn do that. I asked for evidence, you got this:
Individual entities come with multiple variables. I'm not you, and you're not me. The difference between us is I'd look before I leap before investing in anything. You on the other hand, leave it to the bank, while your bank will do things more along my way on your behalf.There is no math here, no derivation, no first principles. You assert that what I'm asking for is doable, and has been done, dont do it, and dont point to anything or anyone who does it. Instead you post some long prose about difference between us. Of course in the "philosophical" there are individual differences and those play a role in the stock market. This is easy to say. However, this is entirely different from "I can make a model that reproduces basic behavior of the stock market from first principles and probability theory, starting with a simple model for individuals".
What youre suggesting is an attempt at a starting point, and you think it's the end point.
This is why I ask for evidence, because then you have to say things that are actually true and think about it. Such is the nature of communication, and the point of this thread. The point is similar to the train experiment -- you can claim things and wing it when there's not foothold, but when you actually run an experiment it's clear that ideas like dont pull the lever to save people dont work. Same here.
Of course I ask for evidence.
I wrote and I quote:
"I talked about individual entities such as banks and corporations, wall street. Basically whales.
For a whale to pump the price of an item on the market, they are really sticking their neck out. If you have 100 shares of TSLA, and for some reason Blackrock decided to pump the living shit out of it and it went to 10k per share, you'd be good selling those 100 shares, as thousands of investors will totally sell their shares, maybe more shares than what Blackrock bought will get sold off for life changing gains. In the process of selling off shares, the price will trickle down, sell orders will not be met, so it would be a constant sell of 9k 8k 7k. Honestly if this happens and it goes to 10k, sell the whole damn thing for 9k and watch it all vanish, and you'll walk away with more than selling at cost as it goes down. When the dust settles and if Blackrock never took any action they would be holding a bag worth less than what they paid for. They could do it again where the masses will get greedy and hop on board and ride the value train up, but then Blackrock has a chance to pull the rug and the price will crash lower than it was when they started, then buy half of what they initially bought.
I see this happen ALL THE TIME with parabolic spikes. Example after example when a chart goes parabolic, expect a 50% pullback right away."
.
.
.
Anyway. As usual I find you ignorant and mentally distracted with an inability to absorb direct information.
Yes everything I said I accurate, and I gave you your proof, You just decided to ignore it and learned nothing. You'd probably still argue the business news has little to do with what happens in the market.
I've had members succeed at trading at least for a time, but I don't see any potential in you at all. Just bets and guesses with no ability to gauge who you're dealing with.
You're foolish and I'll leave it at that.
