Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 30 posts
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: Sugar / Hansen / Milk /...

Posted Image

Posts: 70
0 votes RE: Sugar / Hansen / Milk /...

Posted Image

Posts: 24
0 votes RE: Sugar / Hansen / Milk /...

Posted Image

Posts: 24
0 votes RE: Sugar / Hansen / Milk /...

Posted Image

Posts: 10
0 votes RE: Sugar / Hansen / Milk /...

loooooooool

gay fag below (except for if it's me)
Posts: 32850
0 votes RE: Sugar / Hansen / Milk /...

Cawk, do you actually believe this madness? She literally reposted a picture of myself I'd posted before saying this

Psychotwistologist said:
TC is part and parcel of the Harpy club.

It's the old smoke screen going on SC...lol . Shitgar has TC's dox, so TC is lying to cover her ass.


At this point I'm starting to wonder how far you'll twist a story to have it make sense in the present. I'm hoping it's not as bad as I'm expecting, but I guess we'll see and it'll be data for another time. 

Sug' said:
@Dr. Mengele do u feel like a failure for not being able to manipulate at will u poor baby

maybe it's all the more painful for you with the realisation you got manipulated by tc

you pretty much had to realise you're at the bottom of the food chain lmao

narcs don't react well to failure because they have trained themselves to rationalise how nothing is their fault

it must be a nasty shock

Look at her trying to steer you, she's so transparent. The bitching about me you're doing is liable to lead to people trying to push you against me further. 

I won't change what I'm doing, but how you're liable to process will mutate based on your more immediate company. Even an enemy can expose their foes to ideas and watch them behave differently. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 7/22/2019 8:05:23 PM
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: Sugar / Hansen / Milk /...

Cawk, do you actually believe this madness? She literally reposted a picture of myself I'd posted before saying this

Psychotwistologist said:
TC is part and parcel of the Harpy club.

It's the old smoke screen going on SC...lol . Shitgar has TC's dox, so TC is lying to cover her ass.


At this point I'm starting to wonder how far you'll twist a story to have it make sense in the present. I'm hoping it's not as bad as I'm expecting, but I guess we'll see and it'll be data for another time. 

I don't care if the photo is actually of Sucker or not. Sucker and her whore friends' reactions have made it clear the photo being posted hurts them. This alone is reason enough to hold onto the photo and keep it at close range.

Also, RCT bumped all of my topics on the front page except this one, which was also on the first page, mind you [because they didn't want to bring this specific topic up all the way again, but rather would've preferred it going back in pages to be forgotten, they're transparent and dumb like that] RCT only replied to this topic with a photo believed to be me after I had already bumped this topic from the front page to the front page top.

Can't you really catch up with my thinking to the degree I have to spill out everything literally so every idiot around here would understand?

Sug' said:
@Dr. Mengele do u feel like a failure for not being able to manipulate at will u poor baby

maybe it's all the more painful for you with the realisation you got manipulated by tc

you pretty much had to realise you're at the bottom of the food chain lmao

narcs don't react well to failure because they have trained themselves to rationalise how nothing is their fault

it must be a nasty shock

Look at her trying to steer you, she's so transparent. The bitching about me you're doing is liable to lead to people trying to push you against me further. 

Do you really think they can manipulate me into doing that? They're just a bunch of dumb goose, contradicting each other half of the time. lmao

We're only debate partners Turncoat, there's not going to be anything deeper between us. I don't have it out for you, but you're not somebody I value either, and you know why. I really shouldn't have to explain this bit for you to get it.

You played your money on a temporary horse that performed better than the other horse, however the temporary horse lacked durability that the other horse had and as such, the temporary horse dropped out (at least with the main account), and has no value to you anymore. Now you try to reach for the other horse, but it's too late for that. 

I've noticed your mentor figure efforts you've been trying to apply to me, and I've ignored them, and you should stop bothering with it, it's not going to work. I like having intellectual discussions with you, but that's as far as I will allow it to get.

Posts: 32850
0 votes RE: Sugar / Hansen / Milk /...
Cawk said:
I don't care if the photo is actually of Sucker or not. Sucker and her whore friends' reactions have made it clear the photo being posted hurts them. This alone is reason enough to hold onto the photo and keep it at close range.

From here it just looks like you embarrassing yourself. They don't seem harmed at all, and as this goes on it'll just be a joke in the form of "a gift that keeps on giving". 

How is that photo even hurtful? That person is far more attractive than Sugar is, and your posting it like it's her is free publicity towards an illusory legitimacy. You're building her case by believing in it and dragging in others alongside you that lack both the history and context otherwise. 

Can't you really catch up with my thinking to the degree I have to spill out everything literally so every idiot around here would understand?

The feeling would be mutual if I were trying as hard as you were. Annoyingly, that which I'd prefer to keep to myself is the only quick-ending solution here, so in order to preserve that which I enjoy I'm forced to watch you embolden her in the short term. 

Do you really think they can manipulate me into doing that? They're just a bunch of dumb goose, contradicting each other half of the time. lmao

Sheer exposure can make anyone's message sink in, especially with repetition. 

I've noticed your mentor figure efforts you've been trying to apply to me, and I've ignored them and you should stop bothering with it, it's not going to work.

I'd have called it concerned condescension. 

My mentorship habit tends to not really kick into full gear unless they feed it by "accepting" some degree of apprenticeship. It's an open vector that can change my behaviors and as such I've deemed it bad for me. 

I like having intellectual discussions with you, but that's as far as I will allow it to get.

I don't really expect anything with our relations on here, but I still plan on calling it like I see it. 

How I see it right now is that you're worsening your own position by putting too many eggs into this basket baselessly. Following an old Primal conspiracy that itself rooted from an even older joke as if it's proof is extremely sloppy. As is, nothing you've presented me has given me reason to think that they are pressured by this, quite the opposite in fact, and I can say that from a basis of having personally witnessed multiple times how they actually look when they're under pressure. 

They are way too comfortable, their damage control faces have never looked so chill, so please, stop emboldening her and making yourself look the fool. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 668
0 votes RE: Sugar / Hansen / Milk /...
Cawk said:
I don't care if the photo is actually of Sucker or not. Sucker and her whore friends' reactions have made it clear the photo being posted hurts them. This alone is reason enough to hold onto the photo and keep it at close range.

From here it just looks like you embarrassing yourself. They don't seem harmed at all, and as this goes on it'll just be a joke in the form of "a gift that keeps on giving". 

How is that photo even hurtful? That person is far more attractive than Sugar is, and your posting it like it's her is free publicity towards an illusory legitimacy. You're building her case by believing in it and dragging in others alongside you that lack both the history and context otherwise. 

Can't you really catch up with my thinking to the degree I have to spill out everything literally so every idiot around here would understand?

The feeling would be mutual if I were trying as hard as you were. Annoyingly, that which I'd prefer to keep to myself is the only quick-ending solution here, so in order to preserve that which I enjoy I'm forced to watch you embolden her in the short term. 

Do you really think they can manipulate me into doing that? They're just a bunch of dumb goose, contradicting each other half of the time. lmao

Sheer exposure can make anyone's message sink in, especially with repetition. 

I've noticed your mentor figure efforts you've been trying to apply to me, and I've ignored them and you should stop bothering with it, it's not going to work.

I'd have called it concerned condescension. 

My mentorship habit tends to not really kick into full gear unless they feed it by "accepting" some degree of apprenticeship. It's an open vector that can change my behaviors and as such I've deemed it bad for me. 

I like having intellectual discussions with you, but that's as far as I will allow it to get.

I don't really expect anything with our relations on here, but I still plan on calling it like I see it. 

How I see it right now is that you're worsening your own position by putting too many eggs into this basket baselessly. Following an old Primal conspiracy that itself rooted from an even older joke as if it's proof is extremely sloppy. As is, nothing you've presented me has given me reason to think that they are pressured by this, quite the opposite in fact, and I can say that from a basis of having personally witnessed multiple times how they actually look when they're under pressure. 

They are way too comfortable, their damage control faces have never looked so chill, so please, stop emboldening her and making yourself look the fool. 

 You should really listen to TC, lol

Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Sugar / Hansen / Milk /...

SC stopped being SC the moment Sugar left. Sugar and Raven were the original female pillars of this place.

 

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
10 / 30 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.