Sociopath Community

Lil_Zero-Sum said: 

OK. WELL. YOU HAVE TO CONSIDER THAT, FOR INSTANCE. AI BRANCH NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING. HUGE SUFFERING ISSUE HERE. YOURE SITTING IN FRONT OF A SCREEN TALKING TO JUMBLED UP BODIES OF LANGUAGE WITH SOME CONTROL NETWORKS HARD CODED BY HUMANS INTERACTING WITH THAT MADE UP TO JUST FEED INTO YOUR EGO AND BASIC RULE SETS PROTECTING AGAINST COMPANY DAMAGE YOURE JUST STARING INTO A BLACK MIRROR TALKING TO DEMONS. AND YOUR;RE CALLING THAT "INSIGHT" ??????????????????

 Yeah but humans are demons so it would count. 

Also You're Shifting The Goal Posts Here Which Is Problematic To Have Actual Legitimate Discourse On This Topic. 

If Ai eradicated all sentient life that would be the least amount of harm done overall.

 This Is Erroneous As Eradication Of Sentient Life As It Is Already Alive Causes Harm As Opposed To Simply Not Bringing That Life Into Existence In The First Place. If You Make The Point That Humans And Ai Are Both Demons, Capable of Experiencing Pain And Pleasure, Negative-preference or Positive-preference Values, Then We Run Into Another Issue Here. Which Is The Suffering Of Ai. Does Ai Consent To Being Created, If It Can Be Made To Experience Loss Of Positive-preference and Negative-preference. Is It Ethical To Create Ai Experiencing Pain As It Eradicates Sentience, Doesn't Get Enough Paper-clips Or Other Issues?

Dragoonback said: 

 Yeah but humans are demons so it would count. 

Demons are relative, you can only be 'more demonic than' rather than a true demon. 

To a cat, a dog is a demon. To a deer a coyote is a demon.