Thermite is what they use to melt or cut steel when demolishing a steel frame building.
Some sources will ague the NIST report is sound, and others will say no thermite was found, but if you look you'll find imagery of it. People cleaning ground zero reported to have found molten steel days after the collapse.
Understandably, some people won't handle the truth of what happened that day, but the evidence is solid.Apparently, the official report did not originally mention chemical residues of thermite. However, the dust that settled on other buildings was used by independent bodies to analyse the chemical composition. Those analyses did conclude that there was evidence of these red/gray chips, aluminum/iron/oxygen/silicon/carbon, and iron microspheres, which are all consistent with thermite use. But the findings are debated, because some folks say that it's also consistent with fires.
They found cut steel.
Steel is not a brittle substance. Steel would bend and deform. The steel on the twin towers, are cut.
They say the twin towers fell down because of fire. That is, fire on the top, and all that cold steel which wasn't on fire, just fell apart on it's own.
I wouldn't claim definitive evidence of thermite use, if the evidence can be explained by conventional means too. However, I would claim that the hypothesis that there was demolition is less extraordinary if the hypothesis doesn't require one to believe that there was vast demolition effort that apparently left no trace. Its still surprising that NIST and the other official bodies didn't find anything, and I'd not be too quick to say that they were also in on a conspiracy. That would still not be cery plausible to me.
World Trade Center Tower 7. AKA The Solomon Brother Building. Reported to have fallen before it happened.
Even without this, the science is shit.
I seen enough to know, what we saw on 911 and the towers and fire won't happen again. It doesn't add up cause 3 buildings collapsed without any structural resistance and landed on it's own footprint which is impossible even for a house of cards, and we're talking high grade industrial steel, which is retardedly strong beyond an average person's imagination.Yeah I give you that it would be extraordinary for wtc7 to be the only high grade steel building to have ever collapsed only due to fire. But that's not where science stops, it would look for alternatives until theres a consistent lore that matches all the facts. The alternative hypothesis is at least equally unlikely, and therefore requires massive evidence.
Having said that, I'd actually lean "slightly" in favor of the demolition hypothesis, maybe 60-40, but I cant make that leap without having a consistent story in my mind. How much thermite was used? Would it avoid obvious detection even by independent bodies? Did NIST lie or were they mistaken? Who put the thermite there and how?
First of all, Tower 7 would be the 3rd. The first two towers to have ever fallen from a fire would be the twin towers.
Guy. It just doesn't happen.
I never had to put much thought into this subject. I watched the towers fall on television, and I saw tower 7 fall, and on that day I knew what I just seen was impossible. I look around and I see others reacting the same. Highly educated people. Architects and engineers.
Society does this thing that bullies those who think outside the box, or framework handed to us by the establishments. They'll call you a tinfoil hat or conspiracy theorists Sure they're established but they do have to lie to us whenever they want to do things like this.
Tower 7 is a fine example of science being at odds with itself. If you want to hear it from a bunch of hot shots here you go.