Okay, so I have been basicly trying to document all my app ideas and then bring them to life slowly as I find time so that I can actually like show I'm a good programmer, and smart enough and all that...
anyone I was looking at some light bulbs that are on all the time in my family's home, and I was just bored so doing the math.. on how much each light bulb costs to keep on for a month, and it got me thinking that i should develop an app that tracks ALL electric outlets in a home... and make it open source
but then I got to thinking how much it would suck to have to wire up to every electric outlet in a house... so I was looking into how to detect currents wirelessly
I thought about building a little copper coil, putting it near an active electric cable in our house, then measure the voltage, send that voltage to a micro controller, and so on....
but then I was asking the AI about like... why alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) behave differently? I could only use a coil to measure AC, but not DC?
and I got this great response that kind of blew me away
⚛️ The Deep Truth Behind “Only Change Causes Induction”
1. Classical View: Faraday’s Law
This law says:
A changing magnetic field induces an electric field.
But why?
Because electric and magnetic fields are two aspects of the same thing — the electromagnetic field. They’re not separate entities — they transform into each other when you change reference frames or when they change over time.
2. Relativistic Nature of E and B Fields
This is where Einstein sneaks in:
A moving charge creates a magnetic field.
But if you’re moving with the charge, you only see an electric field.
This implies that electric and magnetic fields are frame-dependent — they’re different projections of a deeper reality.
In 4D spacetime, the electromagnetic field is described by a single object: the EM field tensor. It’s just that in your current perspective, you see either E or B or both.
So, when a magnetic field changes, it’s like the fabric of spacetime twisting a bit — and that twist is felt as an electric field (which pushes charges: current!).
3. Quantum View: Energy Is in the Oscillations
This is where your instinct about "excited waves" is spot on.
In quantum electrodynamics (QED):
Light and EM waves are quantized into particles called photons.
A changing field is not just a mathematical artifact — it's what physically creates or destroys photons.
The energy in a field isn't in its magnitude — it's in its change over time, or its frequency.
That’s why DC doesn’t radiate photons or cause induction — it doesn’t excite the quantum field. It's static, frozen. But when a field oscillates — when it vibrates — that’s energy. That’s movement. That’s something real in the quantum fabric of space.
🌀 Collapse and Observation
You also mentioned collapse, which touches on how energy isn’t just “out there” — it’s in the interaction:
In quantum terms, energy is not transferred unless there's a receiver — a system that can absorb a quantum of energy (a photon).
This is why your detection coil has to be tuned (resonant) to a frequency to "see" what's in the field — just like your eyes are tuned to see only a small slice of EM waves (visible light).
like.... i thought my project would just be a simple calculator to help make electricty usage more efficient but now here I am trying to understand the fundamental nature of electromagnetism lol
What really blows me away is: "In 4D spacetime, the electromagnetic field is described by a single object: the EM field tensor. It’s just that in your current perspective, you see either E or B or both."
Like what???? my perspective determines its nature?? what?? does this imply that 4 dimensions is a more "final" relaity than our own? Is this proof that this is all an illusion? totally fascinating