Sociopath Community

From what I've heard, Taleb was an ex-Muslim with a large twitter presence. Most likely he comitted the attack for one of these two reasons; the first being that he was angry at germans for not accepting him, as he thought being ex Muslim and athiest would allow him to be seen as "one of the good" brown people. The other theory being that he blamed the germans for the the islamisation of Europe

Retard123 said: 

From what I've heard, Taleb was an ex-Muslim with a large twitter presence. Most likely he comitted the attack for one of these two reasons; the first being that he was angry at germans for not accepting him, as he thought being ex Muslim and athiest would allow him to be seen as "one of the good" brown people. The other theory being that he blamed the germans for the the islamisation of Europe

"Surprising profile: A prominent German terror expert has expressed surprise at the suspect’s profile. “After 25 years in this ‘business,’ you think nothing could surprise you anymore. But a 50-year-old Saudi ex-Muslim who lives in East Germany, loves the AfD (Alternative for Germany) and wants to punish Germany for its tolerance towards Islamists — that really wasn’t on my radar,” expert Peter Neumann said."

https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/world/story/ex-muslims-claim-germany-magdeburg-christmas-market-attack-saudi-atheist-warn-of-taqiyyah-conspiracy-2653579-2024-12-22

https://x.com/Salansar1/status/1870382338040848634

Zero evidence it's a false flag and really false flags serve very little purpose in a modern context. You just love conspiracy as it is useful to conceal your fascism adjacent (capital authoritarianism/land ownership) sentiment as being against oppression which it is not.

Funny because this guy is actually more adjacent to your type of mentality with the xenophobic conspiracy stuff, so conveniently it's a "false flag" whenever your types do these things, which they actually are more prone to this type of extreme and sentiment fueled actions.

yeah thanks for nothing 

Dragoonback said: 

Zero evidence it's a false flag and really false flags serve very little purpose in a modern context. You just love conspiracy as it is useful to conceal your fascism adjacent (capital authoritarianism/land ownership) sentiment as being against oppression which it is not.

Funny because this guy is actually more adjacent to your type of mentality with the xenophobic conspiracy stuff, so conveniently it's a "false flag" whenever your types do these things, which they actually are more prone to this type of extreme and sentiment fueled actions.

 Look at this rant. lol

My fascism? The Left are the fascist, Government in control of the media, Left fascist. More Government control in general, Left. Violence and use of lawfare. Done by the Left. Violent suppression of the opposition, Left. Censorship done by the Left.

All you know about this guy is what the corrupt media tells you. YOU have no idea what is true or false.

"false flags serve very little purpose in a modern context" You're kidding right?

9/11

Weapons of Mass Destruction

Fake or instigated Gun Violence

Covid-19

The most successful recent false flag was Jan. 6, the "insurrection" without guns.

9/11 was not a false flag, and yes jet fuel can weaken steel beams enough for a structural collapse along with the initial collision.

Weapons of mass destruction was less like a false flag and more just a lie.

Instigated gun violence is still just gun violence. I'm sure you don't consider counter protestors who shoot protestors to be instigators. The fact is that when you produce and distribute guns, what you get is gun violence being a form of communication, even if that form of communication is something you idealize such as property defense. Even you would agree that's the type of culture you would want, which also extends to protestors who you feel like are disrespecting property that you feel like is rightfully or would be more rightfully under the control of capitalists even if it's a public road. At the end of the day the state capitalist system is more in agreement than you would ever care to admit.

There were in fact firearms brought to the capital, and it's funny how you admit that it's possible to act without guns especially with the support of a community, it's just sad that people like you only realize it in such a messed up and half baked way instead of implying that logic in a smarter way.

Covid-19 is very real and there is no real proof it is man made, if anything viruses are very common especially with so much biological material in the modern age.

But yes, even 9/11 was forever ago in a time the government was experimenting with its power, now the government is even more aware of what type of control it has, which is a lot. And yes the control includes capitalism as part of the government, not apart from it.

I'm not going to fall for people like you acting like you are against the government, but somehow in support of state capitalism. Sorry but you are either preaching to the choir or talking to people like me already know better.

Dragoonback said: 

There were in fact firearms brought to the capital, and it's funny how you admit that it's possible to act without guns especially with the support of a community, it's just sad that people like you only realize it in such a messed up and half baked way instead of implying that logic in a smarter way.

 My point is a real insurrection would be armed. People were not armed. The only guns were had by the police killing protesters.

Jan 6 was instigated by the FBI, this is well known.