Birth rates decrease in response to exploitation either from people dying from your policies or people figuring out what's going on so they stop reproducing while you gloat about "replacing them" while telling
Birth rates are dropping all over the world due to women chasing carriers instead of family.
Japan is one to look at. Last time I looked, Africa is the only growing population,
And why this fascination with birth rates? Seems odd. Is birth rate a marker of a utopian society?
What advantages are we providing for humanity by increasing our population size?
I really don't see said advantages, if anything it seems like it'd make existing conditions worse. Even when compared to other animals in nature it doesn't end well.
Birth rates decrease in response to exploitation either from people dying from your policies or people figuring out what's going on so they stop reproducing while you gloat about "replacing them" while tellingBirth rates are dropping all over the world due to women chasing carriers instead of family.
Japan is one to look at. Last time I looked, Africa is the only growing population,
And why this fascination with birth rates? Seems odd. Is birth rate a marker of a utopian society?
I mean you make it clear you will infinitely blame socialism and infinitely credit capitalism even when it's obviously not true.
There will be no point of honesty where you say "yeah treating people like shit and hoarding wealth kills populations as it is a dysfunction of society."
Birth rates decrease in response to exploitation either from people dying from your policies or people figuring out what's going on so they stop reproducing while you gloat about "replacing them" while tellingBirth rates are dropping all over the world due to women chasing carriers instead of family.
Japan is one to look at. Last time I looked, Africa is the only growing population,
And why this fascination with birth rates? Seems odd. Is birth rate a marker of a utopian society?
I mean you make it clear you will infinitely blame socialism and infinitely credit capitalism even when it's obviously not true.
There will be no point of honesty where you say "yeah treating people like shit and hoarding wealth kills populations as it is a dysfunction of society."
You're delusional. Population change has nothing to do with capitalism or socialism. China had the one baby rule and women are choosing carriers instead of family.
noun
One who is seen to unwittingly support a malignant cause through their 'naive' attempts to be a force for good.
A useful idiot or useful fool is a description of a person, the person thinks they are fighting for a cause without fully comprehending the consequences of their actions, and who does not realize they are being manipulated by the cause's leaders or by other political players
YOU are a useful idiot to the exploitation of capital. You don't even try to deny the exploitative aspect, you just try to do basic propaganda rationalizations which are ultimately just bullshit as you can't actually reconcile capital and "society's stability." Capital is ultimately meant to neglect the idea of society's stability and instead value wealth hoarding capital (and active exploitation that is does require), but you aren't even consistently honest about that part.
You are just stuck in a loop of trying to prove capital's qualities while also denying its reality. On one hand you want to sound badass but on the other hand you don't want to admit to the guilty aspects of it.
