You’re reading other people’s incorrect info and imputing it to me and then saying it’s crazy that I have a law degree. It’s crazy you have a brain because it doesn’t seem to exist when you write things or respond to them. Maybe use it, so we can see that you have one, via your responses.
She's right: having a law degree and the ability to spout ostensibly crazy rhetoric aren't mutually exclusive, and arguably advantageous.
This point she made however didn't counter mine, it's still crazy to think this kind of rationale claims to have a law degree.
It's like the stalker in Baby Reindeer that way.
You do realize that you’re a guy who is disabled and has almost no education and you are making logic and value statements based on your limited knowledge and then claiming that the person who has more knowledge is crazy because they know something you could never know because you don’t have the education to understand what underlies the information, including, but not limited to the history of the US and how it turned from a Constitutional Republic to a Democracy without anyone even informing us of the fact that it changed.
It’s very sad how people who verifiably know so little claim to know so much more than those who verifiably know more than them. Yet, you’re the one saying that I must be crazy because I know something that you can’t wrap your head around because your knowledge is so limited that every single premise goes over your head. You can’t even bother to do the research and then judge. You have to judge from your position as a disabled college dropout.
It just proves that you know nothing important because the most important thing to do before judging something as crazy, is do your own research, but I guess they taught that at your college only at the end of senior year, or you missed that class. It was called thinking for yourself 101.
Try it sometime, then come tell me I’m wrong. You won’t be able to because then you’ll know the truth and know I’m correct. Also, in order to become an attorney, you literally have to prove you’re not crazy by passing the bar exam. It forces you to take information and logically apply it to the law, which produces a result that is either logical by agreement of the bar exam scorers, or is crazy and illogical and gets you a failing grade.
I passed on the first try, proving my logic is on point and proving I am not crazy. I am aware of what goes on, how to synthesize the data, and how to provide a concise and precise explanation of what occurred and why. Thus, I am provably sane and you cannot be insane and be an attorney.
You can be eccentric, but you literally have to prove that you see reality in the same way as experienced attorneys and judges do, which are the people who grade the bar exams. Clearly if one of us is crazy, I’m the least likely one, according to people who are much smarter and more well educated than yourself.
So, try your hardest not to judge me because you can’t understand me because you don’t have the brain capacity to do so. I know it’s hard, but it will get you a lot further than just shutting down every idea, as crazy, just because it goes over your head. Just because I’m smarter than you and know more than you, doesn’t make me crazy. It just makes me smart, and especially smarter than you. You can just say smart instead of crazy and you’ll be more accurate. No need to stigmatize intelligence.
