So let me get this straight.
Chris Chan (who is a sexually active homobisexual cross dresser) did not rape his demented 79 year old Mother, but that claim was in fact a fabrication from Kiwifarms, according to the local dog. Then things got real and the police got involved were various sources online report that Chris Chan was found guilty on incestuous rape charges and served 2 years in prison and still has a criminal record, all by hearsey ?
chris didnt do anything to his mom its just kiwifarms is full of idiots who push lies and rumors as truth because then they get to feel like they had an impact on something big
There's records, you're just mad at what they had to say about you.
So let me get this straight.
Chris Chan (who is a sexually active homobisexual cross dresser) did not rape his demented 79 year old Mother, but that claim was in fact a fabrication from Kiwifarms, according to the local dog. Then things got real and the police got involved were various sources online report that Chris Chan was found guilty on incestuous rape charges and served 2 years in prison and still has a criminal record, all by hearsey ?
A lot of that is wrong. Do your research
She was not found guilty. She is not in prison. She is not a registered sex offender. And she is not bisexual. And what dog? And Chris has no criminal records. Chris is allowed to be around barb. And Chris goes over there.
This is why random people on the Internet do not decide what is just. They can't be trusted to.
So let me get this straight.
Chris Chan (who is a sexually active homobisexual cross dresser) did not rape his demented 79 year old Mother, but that claim was in fact a fabrication from Kiwifarms, according to the local dog. Then things got real and the police got involved were various sources online report that Chris Chan was found guilty on incestuous rape charges and served 2 years in prison and still has a criminal record, all by hearsey ?
A lot of that is wrong. Do your research
She was not found guilty. She is not in prison. She is not a registered sex offender. And she is not bisexual. And what dog? And Chris has no criminal records. Chris is allowed to be around barb. And Chris goes over there.
This is why random people on the Internet do not decide what is just. They can't be trusted to.
So between screencapped records of conversations and other unearthed gems, and your personal opinion...
I'm supposed to trust the opinion?
So let me get this straight.
Chris Chan (who is a sexually active homobisexual cross dresser) did not rape his demented 79 year old Mother, but that claim was in fact a fabrication from Kiwifarms, according to the local dog. Then things got real and the police got involved were various sources online report that Chris Chan was found guilty on incestuous rape charges and served 2 years in prison and still has a criminal record, all by hearsey ?
A lot of that is wrong. Do your research
She was not found guilty. She is not in prison. She is not a registered sex offender. And she is not bisexual. And what dog? And Chris has no criminal records. Chris is allowed to be around barb. And Chris goes over there.
This is why random people on the Internet do not decide what is just. They can't be trusted to.
So between screencapped records of conversations and other unearthed gems, and your personal opinion...
I'm supposed to trust the opinion?
No these are fact. Also unlike all of you I actually knew Chris chan personally for years.
A lot of that is wrong. Do your research
She was not found guilty. She is not in prison. She is not a registered sex offender. And she is not bisexual. And what dog? And Chris has no criminal records. Chris is allowed to be around barb. And Chris goes over there.
This is why random people on the Internet do not decide what is just. They can't be trusted to.
So between screencapped records of conversations and other unearthed gems, and your personal opinion...
I'm supposed to trust the opinion?No these are fact. Also unlike all of you I actually knew Chris chan personally for years.
And you believe Chris?
lolol
So let me get this straight.
Chris Chan (who is a sexually active homobisexual cross dresser) did not rape his demented 79 year old Mother, but that claim was in fact a fabrication from Kiwifarms, according to the local dog. Then things got real and the police got involved were various sources online report that Chris Chan was found guilty on incestuous rape charges and served 2 years in prison and still has a criminal record, all by hearsey ?
A lot of that is wrong. Do your research
Ye
She was not found guilty. She is not in prison.
I said he was in prison. And he was.
Being incarcerated for a year and 7 months will slim down a fat guy.
Also his first letter from Jail, calling a lawsuit against Joshua Moon. AKA Null of Kiwifarms.
This too.
So if I understand the part I highlighted, Chris acknowledges the evidence is true, but he doesn't think the evidence makes him guilty for some reason. He did not plead innocent which might mean he did rape his disabled Mom. Again, it "might" mean so. Probably.
She is not a registered sex offender.
"In August 2022, the Grand Jury hearing was postponed with a continuance. A motion by Chris's lawyer for an autism disorder deferred disposition was filed, to be considered by the court. Shortly after, Chris's case was sealed, though bits of information still emerged. By 11 August, the case file was updated to note that "waive right to indictment" and "transportation order" were added and that a review of Chris's case is scheduled for August 2023."
The above paragraph eventually resulted in Chris Chan not being a registered sex offender, as his Lawyer David Heilberg's argument states his client is autistic...
"On 9 August 2021, Newsweek posted an article on the case, quoting Heilberg, who said that his client was "legally disabled with mental health issues," and called Chris's online antics "a product of mental health issues causing misguided attention seeking and often provocative engagement with others."
That lawyer. His value just skyrocketed 7 fold. Is being autistic really enough to excuse misdemeanors ? Apparently so, and it for that reason he's not going to be listed as a sex offender, regardless of what evidence is stacked against him.
And she is not bisexual.
I don't believe Chris is a she.
In 2001 Chris lost touch with his crush. Kellie Andes. There's a picture of her here. ( This guys whole life is on display with imagery ) It seems to me like this person Chris is bisexual. A lot of his pornography is too graphic to be put on display but it's always made out to females.
And what dog? And Chris has no criminal records. Chris is allowed to be around barb. And Chris goes over there.
This is why random people on the Internet do not decide what is just. They can't be trusted to.
There certainly is an infrastructure for mob mentality to... What's the word..... ...... ..... Influence the law to a certain degree. I believe the Police went after Chris because of a large number of calls the police were getting in regard to Chris and Barb. I'm sure Chris not being registered as a sex offender will upset his public aggressors.
What's happening here is without a doubt, a demonic masterpiece. The accusers, the defenders and the subject need to be saved as you're all currently damned.
I sometimes question if she's talking to someone pretending to be Chris.
Cuckoo said:So if I understand the part I highlighted, Chris acknowledges the evidence is true, but he doesn't think the evidence makes him guilty for some reason.
No it means the evidence is so overwhelming and/or s/he'd be such a bad character witness that attempting to defend her/himself would be liable to make it worse. S/he never pled guilty as much as s/he saw it impossible to defend her/himself in court versus said evidence.
If this were about someone else, I'd have an easier time swallowing that it does not immediately suppose one's guilt beyond implication.
I don't believe Chris is a she.
In 2001 Chris lost touch with his crush. Kellie Andes. There's a picture of her here. ( This guys whole life is on display with imagery ) It seems to me like this person Chris is bisexual. A lot of his pornography is too graphic to be put on display but it's always made out to females.
If there's no sign of attraction to men, that'd not really be bisexuality.
I sometimes question if she's talking to someone pretending to be Chris.
Cuckoo said:So if I understand the part I highlighted, Chris acknowledges the evidence is true, but he doesn't think the evidence makes him guilty for some reason.No it means the evidence is so overwhelming and/or s/he'd be such a bad character witness that attempting to defend her/himself would be liable to make it worse. S/he never pled guilty as much as s/he saw it impossible to defend her/himself in court versus said evidence.
If this were about someone else, I'd have an easier time swallowing that it does not immediately suppose one's guilt beyond implication.I don't believe Chris is a she.
In 2001 Chris lost touch with his crush. Kellie Andes. There's a picture of her here. ( This guys whole life is on display with imagery ) It seems to me like this person Chris is bisexual. A lot of his pornography is too graphic to be put on display but it's always made out to females.If there's no sign of attraction to men, that'd not really be bisexuality.
No it's Chris we did a lot of face time and BR was there at one point.
Chris was the only friend I had that ever matched my chaos. It is lonely without them.
