Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
5 posts
0 votes

Dr Phil Interviews Trump


Posts: 33401

Pre-Interview Shpeal (2:35)


The Interview (1:08:46)


Just started watching the interview, curious if this will ripple or not. 

Already we're seeing Fox News and it's affiliates (further) mirroring the questions about Trump going on right now about Biden to try to make both candidates look equally bad, and therefor render it a party battle solely (they're even mirroring the same scripts across multiple stations from them sharing the same owner), but apparently Dr. Phil is trying to sell the idea that The Left is going to seek retribution in spite of that being how Trump was discussing what The Right will do. 

This shit's super weird gaslighting, and it's starting before the Fall Season this time. 🤔

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 6/12/2024 10:07:04 PM
Posts: 4564
0 votes RE: Dr Phil Interviews Trump

After getting money from Miriam Adelson, Trump's been calling Chuck Schumer a Palestinian. Behind the scenes, Trump is already bought out, and it looks like he's getting ready to stack his administration with retards again. Some unpleasant figures are projected to be in the administration, like JD Vance—who is mobbed up with Peter Thiel/Palantir. Nikki Haley, who is emblematic of the remaining Neocon element, and has extensive relationships with military contractors. Tim Scott, who's momma knew how to strech a dolla. It's a bunch of establishment faggots who will sabotage any real right wing populism, and the most we will get is MAYBE a secure border. Though Trump has been saying we need more legal immigrants. So at this point, Trump is like a Skinwalker of the establishment, this is NOT what was happening in 2016.

Posts: 33401
0 votes RE: Dr Phil Interviews Trump

After getting money from Miriam Adelson, Trump's been calling Chuck Schumer a Palestinian. Behind the scenes, Trump is already bought out, and it looks like he's getting ready to stack his administration with retards again. Some unpleasant figures are projected to be in the administration, like JD Vance—who is mobbed up with Peter Thiel/Palantir. Nikki Haley, who is emblematic of the remaining Neocon element, and has extensive relationships with military contractors. Tim Scott, who's momma knew how to strech a dolla.

No real objections so far. 

It's a bunch of establishment faggots who will sabotage any real right wing populism, and the most we will get is MAYBE a secure border.

Both parties play into 'The Establishment' over how expensive the entire process has become. That problem won't be fixed until the process itself is turned non-profit or otherwise clamps down to a minimum expense limit. Still though, this still continues to read as Right Wing in the way I've known them, albeit with a new coat of paint as the times make the demographics they appeal to appear more cringy to side with. 

feel like the "real right wing" statements being made in-party about others though errs this fallacy similar to that of Christian splintering: 

Posted Image

What we're seeing right now is what's "real" now, and with The Right Wing splintering into so many different beliefs over finding their philosophy neighbors cringe, it makes sense that their angle would be to make the opponent look worse rather than making their own candidate look better over how a common enemy's easier to unify against. There's a lot of ways to "right wing", and I'm not really sure what makes it wrong or impure from one another when compared. The main complaints I see, from both parties, tend to be against Extremism based on how both parties cover the news. 

Back in the day when we didn't have the internet, it was a lot easier to presume people in your party thought more similarly to one another, similar to how two wildly different Christians can argue they're on the same side vs an Atheist over how they rep The Bible. Increased exposure to how these unified beliefs are not the case is what we're dealing with right now, which is largely symptomatic of changing from cable to internet culture. 

So at this point, Trump is like a Skinwalker of the establishment, this is NOT what was happening in 2016.

This looks like his New York delegation politics to me, this is always who he's been and it's who he would have been if he made it in under a Leftist platform instead. Even his idea of how to handle abortion laws is to not say his own opinion, but rather to say that others will handle it for him state-by-state so that blame does not point directly towards him (similarly to Trump University and Trump Steaks). 

All that's changed is his age, the medium, and the scale he's working on. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 6/14/2024 6:00:53 AM
Posts: 4564
0 votes RE: Dr Phil Interviews Trump

What we're seeing right now is what's "real" now, and with The Right Wing splintering into so many different beliefs over finding their philosophy neighbors cringe, it makes sense that their angle would be to make the opponent look worse rather than making their own candidate look better over how a common enemy's easier to unify against. There's a lot of ways to "right wing", and I'm not really sure what makes it wrong or impure from one another when compared.

The support for Trump comes from 2016 populism. Trump was going to build a wall to buffer immigration, and then start domesticating manufacturing. The administration was going to be neutral in foreign affairs, and money was going to be drained out of politics. And Trump was an iconoclastic figure who was going to spearhead the revolution and re-focus our politics. And that was not allowed to happen before, because there is money bogging down every gear in politics.

Because those objectives weren't met, and because the energy of Trump isn't what it used to be, support for Trump is not good right now. As far as what is "right wing", conservatives are not showing much enthusiasm for Trump. He's nominally favored over Biden. And that has to do with who is around Trump and what this campaign's energy has been like. Particularly in relation to what "America First" is supposed to mean.

So at this point, Trump is like a Skinwalker of the establishment, this is NOT what was happening in 2016.

This looks like his New York delegation politics to me, this is always who he's been and it's who he would have been if he made it in under a Leftist platform instead. Even his idea of how to handle abortion laws is to not say his own opinion, but rather to say that others will handle it for him state-by-state so that blame does not point directly towards him (similarly to Trump University and Trump Steaks). 

All that's changed is his age, the medium, and the scale he's working on. 

Having to be neutral on abortion is being pragmatic about how women vote. But he is a delegator, and if he's bringing the people that are being rumored right now, there's going to be some serious problems. Still, there's time to correct course.

Posts: 409
0 votes RE: Dr Phil Interviews Trump

Being neutral is such a cop out strategy. He won't give a fuck about the Ukraine war, which will have ripple effects. He'll fuck up relations with Europe and his term, if it comes to be, will ripple down to undermining USA as a global superpower even further. It'll also undermine every international agreement that has ever existed because people realize that breaking international rules gets you a slap on the wrists. He doesn't realize how much of US relies on countries collectively playing ball on the international playground. Once that's gone, it'll be wild west.

The only really good thing he did in his term is putting his foot down with China. That's it.

He will let every issue he's neutral about slide, like abortion rights, Ukraine war, and fuck knows what else.

last edit on 6/15/2024 1:50:39 PM
5 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.